yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

When to use z or t statistics in significance tests | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What I want to do in this video is give a primer on thinking about when to use a z statistic versus a t statistic when we are doing significance tests.

So, there's two major scenarios that we will see in an introductory statistics class. One is when we are dealing with proportions, so I'll write that on the left side right over here, and the other is when we are dealing with means.

In the proportion case, when we're doing our significance test, we will set up some null hypothesis that usually deals with the population proportion. We might say it is equal to some value; let's just call that p sub 1. Then maybe you have an alternative hypothesis that, well, no, the population proportion is greater than that, or less than that, or it's just not equal to that. So let me just go with that one: it's not equal to p sub 1.

Then what we do to actually test— to actually do the significance test— is we take a sample from the population. It's going to have a sample size of n. We need to make sure that we feel good about making the inference. We've talked about the conditions for inference in previous videos multiple times. But from this, we calculate the sample proportion, and then from this, we calculate the p-value.

The way that we do the p-value— remember, the p-value is the probability of getting a sample proportion at least this extreme, and if it's below some threshold, we reject the null hypothesis, and it suggests the alternative.

Over here, the way we do that is, well, we find an associated z value for that p, for that sample proportion. The way that we calculate it is we say, okay, look, our z is going to be how many of the sampling distribution's standard deviations we are away from the mean. Remember, the mean of the sampling distribution is going to be the population proportion.

So here we got this sample statistic, this sample proportion. The difference between that and the assumed proportion— remember, when we do these significance tests, we try to figure out the probability assuming the null hypothesis is true. So when we see this p sub 0, this is the assumed proportion from the null hypothesis.

That's the difference between these two: the sample proportion and the assumed proportion. Then you'd want to divide it by what's often known as the standard error of the statistic, which is just the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample proportion.

This works out well for proportions because, in proportions, I can figure out what this is. This is going to be equal to the square root of the assumed population proportion times 1 minus the assumed population proportion, all of that over n.

Then I would use this z statistic to figure out the p-value. In this case, I would look at both tails of the distribution because I care about how far I am either above or below the assumed population proportion.

Now, with means, there's definitely some similarities here. You will make a null hypothesis— maybe you assume the population mean is equal to mu 1— and then there's going to be an alternative hypothesis that maybe your population mean is not equal to mu 1.

You're going to do something very simple: you take your population, take a sample of size n. Instead of calculating a sample proportion, you calculate a sample mean. Actually, you can calculate other things, like a sample standard deviation, but now you have an issue.

You say, well, ideally, I would use a z statistic. You could if you were able to say, well, I could take the difference between my sample mean and the assumed mean from the null hypothesis, so that would be this right over here. That's what that 0 means: the assumed mean from the null hypothesis.

I would then divide by the standard error of the mean, which is another way of saying the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean. But this is not so easy to figure out.

In order to figure out this, this is going to be the standard deviation of the underlying population divided by the square root of n. We know what n is going to be if we conducted the sample, but we don't know what the standard deviation is.

So instead, what we do is we estimate this. We'll take the sample mean, we subtract from that the assumed population mean from the null hypothesis, and we divide by an estimate of this, which is going to be our sample standard deviation divided by the square root of n. But because this is an estimate, we actually get a better result.

Instead of saying, hey, this is an estimate of our z statistic, we will call this our t statistic. As we'll see, we’ll then look this up in a t table, and this will give us a better sense of the probability.

More Articles

View All
Tim Brady - How Much Equity Should I Give My First Employees?
[Music] How much equity should you give your first set of employees? This is more art than science. Unfortunately, there’s no chart I can point you to where you can look up the number of employees and experience and get an exact figure. That’s not how it…
Why We Aren't Who We Are | The Tragedy Of Being What You Can't Define
“Trying to define yourself is like trying to bite your own teeth.” Alan Watts. In today’s society, we are expected to define who we are and take that self-image as a basis for making life decisions. For example: I’m an introvert, and from that point of vi…
Warren Buffett is SELLING!
So the 13Fs are out for Q1 of 2021. Of course, the 13F SEC filing shows us exactly what the big-name investors have in their portfolio, so we can see what they’re buying and selling from quarter to quarter. The only annoying thing, though, is that this in…
3d curl intuition, part 2
So where we left off, we had this two-dimensional vector field V, and I have it pictured here as kind of a yellow vector field. I just stuck it in three dimensions in kind of an awkward way where I put it on the XY plane and said, “Pretend this is in thre…
How Your Toothbrush Became a Part of the Plastic Crisis | National Geographic
(Tapping) [Narrator] Hopefully you know this already but … that’s a toothbrush. So are these. And the one thing they have in common: they’re all plastic. But here’s something you might not know. This routine has been around for a millennia. And back then…
How I Got the Shot: Photographing Great White Sharks off Cape Cod | National Geographic
I was trying to do something that hadn’t been done before. That’s it. Oh, I was trying to get a picture of a great white shark in Cape Cod, and that hadn’t been done. Messed up. I was using these seal decoys, swarming, doing aerial photography, using spo…