yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Example using estimation for decimal products


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told that 52 times 762 is equal to 39,624, and then we're told to match each expression to its product. These products, this is the exercise on Khan Academy. You can move them around so the product can be matched to the appropriate expression. So pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, now what you might have realized is all of these expressions deal with the same digits as 52 times 762. They just have the decimal in different places. So what we can do is we can say, "Hey, look, the answer is going to have the digits 39624 in that order." You could see all of these have the digits 3, 9, 6, 2, 4 in that order.

Then we can estimate what these expressions should be equal to, what the product should be equal to, to think about the decimal. So this first expression, 0.52 times 76.2, the way I think about it is 0.52, that's close to 50 hundredths. That's close to a half, and so 76.2, that's close to 76.

And so this first expression, this first product should be roughly half of 76. Half of 76 would be around 38, and so which of these is close to 38? Well, this first one is 39.624, so that's actually the closest to 38. The second one is 396, and then we have 3962.

So I like this first one, the 39.624. That feels right. Now the second expression, 0.52 times 760, well once again, 0.52 is roughly equal to 50 hundredths, roughly equal to 5 tenths, roughly equal to one half. And so, and 762, we could say, "Hey, you know that's if we want to be really rough, really, really approximate it, we could say hey it's roughly 800."

And so this should be about half of 800, so it should be around 400. And so we actually had that choice already there, so this would be 396.24. It definitely wouldn't be the 3962.4, and so I'm already feeling good that this last choice sits down here.

But I can verify it; 5.2, well let's just say that's roughly 5. 762, let's say that's roughly 800. So 5 times 800, that would be around, that would be 4,000. And so we would expect this expression to be close to 4,000, and indeed that's what this choice is.

So it turns out that it was already in the order that we needed it to be, but it's good that we checked on that.

More Articles

View All
Why Ellen May Never Be on Shark Tank!
All right, who here watches Shark Tank? Do you like that show? Shark Tank? I love that show! I love that show! It’s on tonight, and if you haven’t seen it, it’s where inventors pitch their products to investors. A few weeks ago, they asked me to be a gue…
You need to talk to your users. #entrepreneur #startup #tech
Most people in the world have the idea on how new startups are formed completely wrong. They think ideas of new products are something the fantasies come up with on a lazy Sunday or a late night coding session. You probably know it doesn’t work this way. …
Time past between two clock faces
We are asked how much time has passed from the time on the left, so right over here, to the time on the right, which we see right over here. They say that the time passed is less than 12 hours. So like always, pause this video and see if you can answer th…
Saddle points
In the last video, I talked about how if you’re trying to maximize or minimize a multivariable function, you can imagine its graph. In this case, this is just a two-variable function, and we’re looking at its graph. You want to find the spots where the ta…
Passive Income 2019: How I now earn $7930 per month passively
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, I think this video topic has become somewhat of an annual tradition because, on March 3rd, 2017, I posted a video explaining how I was making three thousand nine hundred and fifty dollars per month in passive inco…
We Shouldn't Celebrate This
What toys did you play with as a kid? For many who watch this channel, I’m sure the answer could be action figures, maybe a superhero you loved from that cartoon you watched as kids. We don’t think much about the media we consume and the toys we play with…