yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Example using estimation for decimal products


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told that 52 times 762 is equal to 39,624, and then we're told to match each expression to its product. These products, this is the exercise on Khan Academy. You can move them around so the product can be matched to the appropriate expression. So pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, now what you might have realized is all of these expressions deal with the same digits as 52 times 762. They just have the decimal in different places. So what we can do is we can say, "Hey, look, the answer is going to have the digits 39624 in that order." You could see all of these have the digits 3, 9, 6, 2, 4 in that order.

Then we can estimate what these expressions should be equal to, what the product should be equal to, to think about the decimal. So this first expression, 0.52 times 76.2, the way I think about it is 0.52, that's close to 50 hundredths. That's close to a half, and so 76.2, that's close to 76.

And so this first expression, this first product should be roughly half of 76. Half of 76 would be around 38, and so which of these is close to 38? Well, this first one is 39.624, so that's actually the closest to 38. The second one is 396, and then we have 3962.

So I like this first one, the 39.624. That feels right. Now the second expression, 0.52 times 760, well once again, 0.52 is roughly equal to 50 hundredths, roughly equal to 5 tenths, roughly equal to one half. And so, and 762, we could say, "Hey, you know that's if we want to be really rough, really, really approximate it, we could say hey it's roughly 800."

And so this should be about half of 800, so it should be around 400. And so we actually had that choice already there, so this would be 396.24. It definitely wouldn't be the 3962.4, and so I'm already feeling good that this last choice sits down here.

But I can verify it; 5.2, well let's just say that's roughly 5. 762, let's say that's roughly 800. So 5 times 800, that would be around, that would be 4,000. And so we would expect this expression to be close to 4,000, and indeed that's what this choice is.

So it turns out that it was already in the order that we needed it to be, but it's good that we checked on that.

More Articles

View All
How I Achieved High Income In My 20s | How to Make More Money
[Music] So in this video, I wanted to share some things that I’ve learned about money over the past eight years or so. I’m not saying that I’m some genius who’s got money all figured out or anything, but over the past eight years I’ve made some decisions …
How to sell a corporate jet!
Budget is about $5 million. Looking for a plane to fit seven to eight people. Are you familiar with any of the aircraft models that they might be interested in? One of the partners currently has a plane right now. I’ll get you the specifics on it. I think…
How I Bought My NEW Las Vegas Home For $0
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here! So, as some of you know, I recently bought a home in Las Vegas, and I’m gonna be moving from California full-time by the end of the year. However, even though there have been a multitude of various reasons behind thi…
Designing the Costumes | Saints & Strangers
[Music] It’s always fun sitting on sets, watching everybody in costumes. CU of course, it’s the nearest thing to time travel you can kind of get, you know? Everyone disappears if the crews are in a certain way. You just look around, you see these people, …
Forming comparative and superlative modifiers | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hey Garian, so last time we talked about Raul the Penguin and how he was happier than another penguin, Cesar. Um, but I want to talk today about how to form the comparative and the superlative. You know how to compare, how to say something is more than or…
Worked example: Calculating concentration using the Beer–Lambert law | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
So I have a question here from the Cots, Trickle, and Townsend Chemistry and Chemical Reactivity book, and I got their permission to do this. It says a solution of potassium permanganate has an absorbance of 0.53 when measured at 540 nanometers in a 1 cen…