yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Example using estimation for decimal products


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told that 52 times 762 is equal to 39,624, and then we're told to match each expression to its product. These products, this is the exercise on Khan Academy. You can move them around so the product can be matched to the appropriate expression. So pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, now what you might have realized is all of these expressions deal with the same digits as 52 times 762. They just have the decimal in different places. So what we can do is we can say, "Hey, look, the answer is going to have the digits 39624 in that order." You could see all of these have the digits 3, 9, 6, 2, 4 in that order.

Then we can estimate what these expressions should be equal to, what the product should be equal to, to think about the decimal. So this first expression, 0.52 times 76.2, the way I think about it is 0.52, that's close to 50 hundredths. That's close to a half, and so 76.2, that's close to 76.

And so this first expression, this first product should be roughly half of 76. Half of 76 would be around 38, and so which of these is close to 38? Well, this first one is 39.624, so that's actually the closest to 38. The second one is 396, and then we have 3962.

So I like this first one, the 39.624. That feels right. Now the second expression, 0.52 times 760, well once again, 0.52 is roughly equal to 50 hundredths, roughly equal to 5 tenths, roughly equal to one half. And so, and 762, we could say, "Hey, you know that's if we want to be really rough, really, really approximate it, we could say hey it's roughly 800."

And so this should be about half of 800, so it should be around 400. And so we actually had that choice already there, so this would be 396.24. It definitely wouldn't be the 3962.4, and so I'm already feeling good that this last choice sits down here.

But I can verify it; 5.2, well let's just say that's roughly 5. 762, let's say that's roughly 800. So 5 times 800, that would be around, that would be 4,000. And so we would expect this expression to be close to 4,000, and indeed that's what this choice is.

So it turns out that it was already in the order that we needed it to be, but it's good that we checked on that.

More Articles

View All
How Does A Slinky Fall?
[Applause] [Music] Now, at some point growing up, most of us have been captivated by one of these: a slinky. But recently, I found out one of the most mesmerizing things about how it moves is something I’d never seen before: how it falls. So what’s so s…
r greater than g but less inequality
One of the core ideas of Thomas Piketty’s book is if the return on capital is greater than the growth in economy, then that could drive inequality. Inequality is a natural byproduct of a market capitalist economy, and one could argue that, hey, look, some…
Alliteration, Assonance, and Onomatopoeia | Style | Grammar
Hello Garian, hello Rosie, hi David. So, uh, you’ve caught me mid-scribble in the greatest challenge of my career: will I be able to write the word “onomatopoeia”? You can do it. Did I get it? You did it! Yes! This is one of my least favorite words to…
Poop Splash Elimination - Smarter Every Day 22
Hey it’s me Destin. So here’s the deal. If you watch this video, it has the potential to change every day of your life for the rest of your life. However, you also have the potential to think about me, and whoever sent you this video, every day when you’r…
r-selected and K-selected population growth strategies | High school biology | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about different population growth strategies for different species and think about if we can come up with a broad categorization or if there’s a broad categorization already out there for us. We see that there…
Quantitative information in texts | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! Today we’re going to talk about quantitative information in texts. But I want to start with a question: What’s the best way to describe the way a horse looks as it runs? What’s the most efficient way? I guess I could just use words, right?…