yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Example using estimation for decimal products


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

We are told that 52 times 762 is equal to 39,624, and then we're told to match each expression to its product. These products, this is the exercise on Khan Academy. You can move them around so the product can be matched to the appropriate expression. So pause this video and see if you can figure that out.

All right, now what you might have realized is all of these expressions deal with the same digits as 52 times 762. They just have the decimal in different places. So what we can do is we can say, "Hey, look, the answer is going to have the digits 39624 in that order." You could see all of these have the digits 3, 9, 6, 2, 4 in that order.

Then we can estimate what these expressions should be equal to, what the product should be equal to, to think about the decimal. So this first expression, 0.52 times 76.2, the way I think about it is 0.52, that's close to 50 hundredths. That's close to a half, and so 76.2, that's close to 76.

And so this first expression, this first product should be roughly half of 76. Half of 76 would be around 38, and so which of these is close to 38? Well, this first one is 39.624, so that's actually the closest to 38. The second one is 396, and then we have 3962.

So I like this first one, the 39.624. That feels right. Now the second expression, 0.52 times 760, well once again, 0.52 is roughly equal to 50 hundredths, roughly equal to 5 tenths, roughly equal to one half. And so, and 762, we could say, "Hey, you know that's if we want to be really rough, really, really approximate it, we could say hey it's roughly 800."

And so this should be about half of 800, so it should be around 400. And so we actually had that choice already there, so this would be 396.24. It definitely wouldn't be the 3962.4, and so I'm already feeling good that this last choice sits down here.

But I can verify it; 5.2, well let's just say that's roughly 5. 762, let's say that's roughly 800. So 5 times 800, that would be around, that would be 4,000. And so we would expect this expression to be close to 4,000, and indeed that's what this choice is.

So it turns out that it was already in the order that we needed it to be, but it's good that we checked on that.

More Articles

View All
Answering Google's Most Asked Questions of 2022
For most of Google’s relatively short existence, we’ve searched small, silly, insignificant questions - things like how to tell if a papaya is ripe. The color is almost fully yellow, and the feeling is slightly soft. Don’t forget to scoop out the seeds! S…
15 Valuable Lessons You Learn After Your First Big Win
You know, everyone always talks about lessons you learn from failures and how important they are. But if all you have are failures, then maybe those lessons are incomplete. Today we’re going over 15 valuable lessons you only learned after your first win. …
Using matrices to manipulate data: Game show | Matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
We’re told in the beginning of each episode of a certain game show. Each contestant picks a certain door out of three doors. Then the game show host randomly picks one of the two prize bundles. After each round, each contestant receives a prize based on t…
Watch Photographer Evacuate Mom and Dogs From Harvey's Devastating Flooding | National Geographic
I’m a photojournalist typically based in Istanbul and from Texas. Right now, I have to be visiting my family in Houston, and this is what we’re dealing with. I’m in about a foot of water; it’s getting worse by the minute, and I’m about to evacuate my moth…
The Gilded Age part 2 | The Gilded Age (1865-1898) | US History | Khan Academy
So, we were talking about the wealth inequality that characterized the Gilded Age, but you were telling me that that’s not the only thing, Kim, that characterizes this period. Right? What really makes the Gilded Age happen is what we call the Second Indus…
Billionaire Warren Buffett: HOW to calculate the INTRINSIC VALUE of a STOCK
Actually, it’s very simple. The first investment primer—when would you guess it was written? The first investment primer that I know of, and it was pretty good advice, was delivered in about 600 BC by Aesop. And Aesop, you’ll remember, said, “A bird in th…