yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: recognizing function from Taylor series | Series | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So we're given this expression: Is the Taylor series about zero for which of the following functions? They give us some choices here, so let's just think a little bit about this series that they gave us.

If we were to expand it out, let's see. When n is equal to 0, it would be ((-1)^0) power, which is 1, times (X^0), which is 1, over 0 factorial, which is 1. So it'll be 1 plus...

When n is 1, well then this is going to be negative. So it's going to be minus, and then (x^1) over 1 factorial. Well, I could just write that as (X) right over here.

Then when n is 2, the negative ((-1)^2) is going to be positive, so plus (x^2) over 2. Then it's going to be minus (x^3) over 3 factorial, and then it’s going to be plus, and I can keep going.

You've seen this before: (X^4) over 4 factorial. It's going to keep going, minus plus; it's going to keep alternating on and on and on.

Now, our general form for a Taylor series about zero, which we could also call a Maclaurin series, would be, our general form would be (F(0)) plus (F'(0) \cdot X) plus (F''(0) \cdot \frac{X^2}{2}) plus the third derivative at 0 (\cdot \frac{X^3}{3!}) plus the fourth derivative, you get the idea, evaluated at 0 (\cdot \frac{X^4}{4!}), and we would just go on and on and on.

Now to figure out which function in order for this, in order what I wrote in blue, to be the Maclaurin series, that means that (F(0)) needs to be equal to 1. It means that (F'(0)), actually let me write this down, it means that (F(0)) needs to be equal to 1. (F(0) = 1).

It means that (F''(0)) needs to be the coefficient on the (X) here, which is negative 1. And we could keep going. It means that the second derivative at zero, well that's going to be the coefficient on this (\frac{X^2}{2}), so that's got to be equal to 1.

And you see the general idea that the third derivative at 0 is equal to 1. It's the coefficient on (\frac{X^3}{3!}), which is negative 1 right over here.

So just using this information, can we figure out which of these it is? You could do a little bit of deductive reasoning here.

Let's evaluate all of these functions at zero and see which of these are 1. So (s(0)), well that's 0 just by looking at this first constraint. (s(0)) isn't 1; we can rule that out.

Cosine of 0 is 1, so that's still in the running. (e^0 = 1), and then the natural log of 1 + 0, that's the natural log of 1, which is 0, so that's out of the running.

So just from that first constraint, knowing that (F(0) = 1), we're able to rule out two of the choices.

Then knowing that the first derivative evaluated at zero is going to be negative 1, well what's the first derivative of cosine of (x)? What's negative sine of (x)? If we evaluate that at zero, we're not going to get negative 1; we're going to get 0, so we can rule this out.

Now, the first derivative of (e^x) is (e^x). If we evaluate that at zero, we're going to get 1, not negative 1, so we can rule that out.

Not even looking at anything else, we have a pretty good sense that D is probably our answer. But we could check the first derivative here: (F'(x)) is going to be negative (e^x), so (F'(0)) is going to be (e^0) or negative 1, so it meets that one.

And if you were curious, you could keep going and see that it meets all the other constraints. But Choice D is the only one that meets even the first two constraints for the function at zero and the first derivative at zero.

More Articles

View All
Methods for preparing buffers | Acids and bases | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
Let’s look at two different methods for preparing buffer solutions. In the first method, we’re going to add an aqueous solution of a strong base, sodium hydroxide, to an aqueous solution of a weak acid, acetic acid. Our goal is to calculate the pH of the…
This Is Your Brain on Nature | Explorer
[Music] As a nature writer, I’ve always intuitively known that it was healthy for human beings to be out in the natural world. But it’s amazing what science has proven about what nature does to your brain. Some of the scientists I’ve been talking to would…
Stoicism Cured His Depression | A mini documentary
Some things are up to us, some things are not up to us. It’s amazing how simple the sentence sounds, right? But it’s so true. If you can live it, if you can accept it, you will have less stress in your life. In Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia, I spoke …
The Pirate's Perspective | Lawless Oceans
Why did you want to go into piracy? But what made you want to conduct piracy locally? Is it a little way you or the other one for the oven can grow up? Yeah, I’m getting my devil on. Call myself the other one until the work was enough. The National Guard…
The Most Profound Philosophical Ideas
All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher. Reading philosophy isn’t fun; it’s a slow process that requires your full attention. But it is one of the most rewarding things you can do. It fills you with the sense of growt…
Kayaking Over a Waterfall | Science of Stupid: Ridiculous Fails
I think it’s time we the scientifically challenged concentrate on one of science’s heroes, Tyler Bradt, kayaker extraordinaire. He wants to kayak over this, Palouse Falls in Washington. Thousands of cubic feet of water pass over this fall every second and…