yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

In the 19th Century, Going to the Doctor Could Kill You | Nat Geo Explores


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

[Music] They deliver babies. They help you when you're sick. They are the ones who examine all the things doctors keep her health in check. They spend years of training to do it. But that wasn't always the case.

[Music] Medicine for most of the 19th century was completely different to how it is now. In America, there was virtually no regulation at all. Anybody could declare himself or herself to be a physician. Most physicians graduated never having practiced at the bedside, never having performed surgery, and they probably never even seen a laboratory. This was not a lucrative profession. It didn't tend to attract people coming from money, and very few people were willing to invest a lot of money in an education. So basically, it was a job no one really wanted to do.

On top of that, medical science itself was still unsophisticated. Many surgeons weren't totally sure what even caused infections. So to treat some of them, it often just cut off a person's limbs. No big deal. They were also pretty mad about keeping their practice sterile. If you're a surgeon in the 1860s or the 1870s, you might well try and keep your wards clean and the surgical table clean-ish. Yep, yes, you're very likely to be operating in another apron which is stained and encrusted with blood and other bodily fluids which have accumulated over perhaps decades. In fact, many surgeons would wear their bloody leather apron as a badge of honor because it revealed to everybody just how many operations you'd performed.

It would take years before they learned how unsanitary this was and before they decided, "Hey, maybe we shouldn't do that." Up until then, doctors and scientists slowly began to prove that illnesses and infections were caused by microscopic organisms. This idea called the germ theory was a big deal at the time, but a lot of people didn't buy it. People would say there's absolutely no way that a tiny microscopic organism could possibly kill an organism as big as we are.

You ignore some of us. Semmelweis was a Hungarian who was working in a maternity ward in Austria, and in the 1840s, he noticed that women who gave birth in one particular ward, they were dying much more commonly than the mothers who were giving birth in a nearby ward. There was a big difference between these two wards. In the first one, doctors and medical students who spent part of the day in the morgue and the rest of the day in deliveries, they were passing these germs from the corpses to the first-time women and leaving extraordinarily tragically high numbers of babies without a mother.

The other ward was run by nurses who did not participate in autopsies, and that's why those mothers were far, far less off and dying. Semmelweis argued that some kind of living matter is killing these women and the doctors were transferring it from the dead to the living. So he installed a bowl of disinfectant and insisted that all of the carers wash their hands in it. The rates of death plummeted.

The sad thing is people still didn't get on board with Semmelweis's argument about this living matter. But why? There were a lot of reasons, but one of them is that it was absolutely intolerable for a large number of physicians and obstetricians to recognize that they unwittingly caused the deaths of hundreds or even thousands of women. Many of them just simply couldn't accept this.

But by the 1880s, after more and more scientific proof, a lot of surgeons started accepting the fact that germs caused illness. They even began to make some changes. They started to wash their hands and also started to use tools which don't have any spaces where bacteria could gather. You think about your classic scalpel: you have a wooden handle and then you have the metal blade—any number of places in which bacteria could secrete themselves and then cause infection.

By the early 1900s, they were starting also to wear latex gloves. Surgery became safer, and it was in less than a generation that surgery was becoming revolutionized in this way. Once physicians and scientists knew which germs were causing certain illnesses, they developed the first vaccines to target specific diseases and then antibiotics to treat infections and save a lot of lives.

It wasn't until germ theory was fully established that people looked back and rediscovered Semmelweis in the early 20th century. The late 19th-century statues to him were erected, all sorts of biographies were written; he's hailed as a great hero. Once surgeons could guarantee a clean environment in which to operate, the entire field of surgery just awesomely transforms.

I think it becomes the most prestigious field of medicine. You also see huge changes in the way doctors were trained. By the early 20th century, over 100 medical schools were founded in the US, and training became more intensive. Medical students began to truly learn the science behind medicine. It was the first time in human history that medical scientists really knew what caused people to die of infectious disease.

The immediate offspring of this? More public health, better public health, better cleaning. So it's already starting to save lives. It's quite a remarkable thing to see. [Music]

More Articles

View All
Would You Risk Venomous Insect Stings for Your Job? | National Geographic
Harvest rants are intriguing because not only are they among the most painful of all stinging insects, their venom is 30-40 times more toxic than, say, rattlesnake venom. If you pick them up by hand, well, you might just get stung. The biggest risk around…
Can You Hear the Reggae in My Photographs? | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
My mom always said that, um, it’s always best to give bitter news with honey. And so if you know anything about Bob and the science behind his music, every song has a one drop rhythm. The one drop rhythm is a simulation of our heartbeat. So, do that’s pho…
2015 AP Chemistry free response 2c | Thermodynamics | Chemistry | Khan Academy
Because the dehydration reaction is not observed to occur at 298 Kelvin, the student claims that the reaction has an equilibrium constant less than 1.00 at 298 Kelvin. Do the thermodynamic data for the reaction support the student’s claim? Justify your an…
Dave Bautista Makes a Log Ladder | Running Wild With Bear Grylls
[music playing] So the terrain here is definitely getting steeper and more committing. But you know, so much of survival is about just trying to be resourceful. I just wonder if maybe we maybe use that old trunk. Use that, get that down, and then we can d…
Beta decay | Physics | Khan Academy
Did you know that paper industries can use radioactivity to ensure consistent thickness throughout the paper? That’s right! But doesn’t it make you wonder how do you use radioactivity to do that? Well, let’s find out. If you have a very heavy nucleus, th…
Warren Buffett's 2021 Stock Portfolio
Hey guys, welcome back to the channel! In this video, we are going to be talking about what Warren Buffett has been buying and selling in Q4 of 2020 and what his stock portfolio looks like as we lead into 2021. Because yes, I know it’s February already in…