yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Cosine equation solution set in an interval


4m read
·Nov 10, 2024

In a previous video, we established the entire solution set for the following equation. We saw that all the x's that can satisfy this equation are a combination of these x's and these x's. Here, the reason why I'm referring to each of them is numerous x's. For any integer value of n, you'll get another solution.

What I want to do in this video is to make things a little bit more concrete. The way that we're going to do it is by exploring all of the x values that satisfy this equation that sit in the closed interval from negative pi over 2 to 0. So I encourage you, like always, pause this video and have a go at it by yourself before we work through it together.

All right, now let's work through this together. The first helpful thing is we have these algebraic expressions. We have things written in terms of pi; let's approximate them all in terms of decimals. So even pi over 2, we can approximate that. Let's see if pi is approximately 3.14; half of that is approximately 1.57. So we could say this is approximately the closed interval from negative 1.57 to zero.

Negative 1.57 isn't exactly negative pi over 2, but it'll hopefully be suitable for what we're trying to do here. Now let's see if we can write the different parts of these expressions or at least approximate them as decimals. This could be rewritten as x is approximately, if you were to take 1/8 times the inverse cosine of negative 1/6. I encourage you to verify this on your own; on a calculator, you would get that that's approximately 0.22.

Then, pi over 4 is approximately 0.785, so this expression would be approximately 0.22 minus 0.7 times n, where n could be any integer. Then, this one over here on the right, let me do that in the yellow, x could be approximately equal to... well, if this evaluates to approximately 0.22, then this is just the negative of it, so it's going to be negative 0.22.

Then, it's plus what approximately pi over 4 is, so 0.785n. Now, what we could do is just try different n's and see if we're starting above or below this interval, and then see which of the x values actually fall in this interval. So let's just start here. If we just start at n equals zero... actually, when I set up a little table here, if we have n here and if we have the x value here.

When n is zero, well then you don't see this term, and you just get approximately 0.22. Now let's compare that to the interval; the upper bound of that interval is zero, so this does not sit in the interval. This is too high, and we would want to define the x's that sit in the interval. We want to find lower values, so it's good that here we're subtracting 0.785.

I would use positive integer values of n to decrease this 0.22 here. So when n equals 1, we would subtract 0.785 from that, and I'll round all of these to the hundredths place. That would get us to negative 0.57, and that does sit in the interval, so this looks good. This would be a solution in that interval right over here.

Let's try n equals 2, so we would subtract 0.785 again, and that would get us to negative 1.35, not 2.5, 3.5, and that also sits in the interval. It's larger than negative 1.57, so that looks good. Let's subtract 0.785 again when n equals 3; that would get us to negative 2.14. Well, that's all of a sudden out of the interval because that's below the lower bound here, so this is too low.

So we've been able to find two x values that sit in the interval that we cared about. Now, let's use these x values right over here, and I'll set up another table. So let's see, we have our n and then we have our x values. So let's start with n equals 0 because that's easy to compute. Then this term would go away, and we'd have negative 0.22.

That's actually in this interval here; it's below zero; it's larger than negative 1.57, so that one checks out. But now, to really explore, we have to go in both directions. We have to increase it or decrease it. So if we wanted to increase it, we could have a situation where n equals 1.

So if n equals 1, we're going to add 0.785 to this. Now, you immediately know that that's going to be a positive value. If you computed it, it'd be 0.57, which is larger than zero, so this is too high. So now we could try going lower than negative 0.22 by having negative values of n.

So if n is equal to negative 1, that means we're subtracting 0.785 from this right over here, which would get us to negative 1.01. Well, that one works out, so that's in our interval. Now let's subtract 0.785 again, so I'll have n equals negative 2. If I subtract 0.785 again, I could round that to negative 1.79, which is lower than negative 1.57, so it's out of our interval, so it's too low.

All of the x values that are in our interval that satisfy this equation are these two right over here and this one, and this one. And we are done.

More Articles

View All
Modeling with composite functions | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] “Carter has noticed a few quantitative relationships related to the success of his football team and has modeled them with the following functions.” All right, this is interesting. So he has this function, which he denotes with the capital N…
How I plan my day/week/month (realistic and flexible)
Have you experienced this before? You have so many things in your calendar, and also you want to do something, but you don’t know where to start. Because you don’t know where to start, you tend to procrastinate until the end of the day. At the end of the …
Storytellers Summit Day 1 | National Geographic
Hello everyone. I’m here to tell you a story today. It was the Ramadan of 2017 in Johannesburg, a few months after I started working as a photographer. I pitched the story to an editor, saying I would like to photograph the taraweeh as a contemporary look…
Extending geometric sequences | Mathematics I | High School Math | Khan Academy
So we’re told that the first four terms of a geometric sequence are given. They give us the first four terms. They say, what is the fifth term in the sequence? And like always, pause the video and see if you can come up with the fifth term. Well, all we …
There's no such thing as Universally Preferable Behaviour
Universally preferable behavior is the name of Stefan Malan’s book arguing for an objective non-religious foundation for morality. Uh, I’ll begin by saying I don’t believe that anything that could fairly be called objective morality exists. Uh, so catego…
I Bought a Rain Forest, Part 2 | Nat Geo Live
Conservation is a bourgeois concept. What we do is we create a huge amount of carbon, and we expect poor people to look after our carbon sink for us. And they can’t because they haven’t got anything. I went to live with more illegal loggers. I wanted to …