yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The truly irregular verbs | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Hello Garans, welcome to the last and strangest part of the irregular verb: the truly irregular. Yes, friends, here I have compiled all the weirdest, all the wooliest, all the eeriest and spookiest forms of verbs that don't otherwise fall into other categories.

So we can't say that they end with a changed "ed," we can't say that they end with an "en," and we can't say that there's a vowel shift. We've already covered those; this is the time for the weird stuff. First up: "ught." Oh, what a strange collection of letters that is to be found in English!

So we take a word like "teach," and in the past tense, it's "taught." Likewise, "catch" becomes "caught," and "bring" becomes "brought." Yes, that's really strange! There are only a couple of words that behave that way.

It's also pretty weird and pretty rare for there to be a vowel shift from the present to the past, and also a "du" sound. So, for example, we take the word "flee," which means to run away, and in the past, it's "fled." Likewise, in the present, we say "say," and in the past, we say "said."

So that "a" becomes "e," and that "e" becomes "e," and it's this weird vowel shift that's also followed up by a "du" sound. There are some words for whom time does not exist. These are verbs for whom the present tense is the same as the past tense. Prepare to have your mind blown!

The past tense of "bet" is "bet," the past tense of "set" is "set," the past tense of "hurt" is "hurt." Yeah, it's weird! Finally, there are some helper verbs or auxiliary verbs called modals that are super weird and have these properties that aren't repeated anywhere else in English.

So present tense "can" becomes past tense "could." I can stand on my head, or I could stand on my head when I was five. "May" becomes "might" in the past, "shall" becomes "should," and "will" becomes "would."

And what's super weird about these "L's" in "could," "should," or "would" is—listen to me saying them—you don't pronounce the "L's." And this is the only place in English where that silent "L" shows up. It's so strange! Ah, I love it!

These are the irregular verbs, and these, in fact, are the most irregular of the irregular. If you can master these, you will be a grammar champion, and I believe in you because you can learn anything.

David out.

More Articles

View All
Safari Live - Day 166 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Good afternoon, good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, and a very warm welcome to you again here on Safari Live. We are on a …
Startup Investor School Day 2 Live Stream
Hey good morning! Thank you. We have a lot to do today, so I’d like to get my part out of the way as quickly as possible. Good morning again and welcome to our second day of Startup Investor School. My role is a little bit more, but not much more, than te…
Misnomers
Hey Vsauce, Michael here. I’m sorry. Look, I didn’t name myself, but apparently Michael is the ninth most disliked baby name for a boy - according to a survey by BabyNameWizard.com. At least it didn’t top the charts like the rhyming ‘a den’ names - Jayden…
Why Warren Buffett Refuses to Buy Stocks | 2022 Annual Letter
Every year I look forward to Warren Buffett’s annual letter. This letter is full of advice and offers a sneak peek into how Buffett is thinking about the stock market and the overall investment landscape. Surprisingly, Buffett continues to hold cash and n…
How old is a private jet owner?
The average age of a buyer of an airplane, like the CEO of a company or an entrepreneurial lead business, has drastically changed. Not just in the last couple of years, really over the course of the last 20 years. Twenty to thirty years ago, the average …
Stop Caring About What Isn't Yours: Epictetus’ Lessons from My Novel
Stoic philosopher Epictetus didn’t sugarcoat anything. He was direct and told the listener exactly how it was – at least, from the Stoic perspective. His no-nonsense approach, which becomes apparent when reading what’s left of his lectures, is why I love …