yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Approximating limits using tables | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

This video we're going to try to get a sense of what the limit as x approaches 3 of ( x^3 - 3x^2 ) over ( 5x - 15 ) is. And when I say get a sense, we're going to do that by seeing what values for this expression we get as x gets closer and closer to 3. Now, one thing that you might want to try out is: well, what happens to this expression when x is equal to 3?

Well then, it's going to be ( 3^3 - 3 \times 3^2 ) over ( 5 \times 3 - 15 ). So at ( x = 3 ), this expression is going to be, and see, the numerator we have ( 27 - 27 = 0 ) over ( 15 - 15 = 0 ). So this expression is actually not defined at ( x = 3 ). We get this indeterminate form; we get ( 0/0 ).

But let's see, even though the function, even though the expression is not defined, let's see if we can get a sense of what the limit might be. And to do that, I'm going to set up a table. So let me set up a table here, and actually, I'm going to set up two tables. So this is ( x ), and this is ( \frac{x^3 - 3x^2}{5x - 15} ). And actually, I'm going to do that again, and I'll tell you why in a second. So this is going to be ( x ), and this is ( \frac{x^3 - 3x^2}{5x - 15} ).

The reason why I set up two tables, I didn't have to do two tables; I could have done it all in one table. But hopefully, this will make it a little bit more intuitive. What I'm trying to do is on this left table, I'm going to let's try out x values that get closer and closer to 3 from the left, from values that are less than 3. So for example, we go to ( 2.9 ) and figure out what the expression equals when ( x ) is ( 2.9 ). But then we could try to get even a little bit closer than that; we could go to ( 2.99 ), and then we could go even closer than that; we could go to ( 2.999 ).

One way to think about it here is, as we try to figure out what this expression equals as we get closer and closer to 3, we're trying to approximate the limit from the left. So, limit from the left. And why do I say the left? Well, if you think about this on a coordinate plane, these are the x values that are to the left of 3, but we're getting closer and closer and closer, we're moving to the right. But these are the x values that are on the left side of 3; they're less than 3.

But we also, in order for the limit to exist, we have to be approaching the same thing from both sides, from both the left and the right. So we could also try to approximate the limit from the right. And so what values would those be? Well, those would be x values larger than 3. So we could say ( 3.1 ), but then we might want to get a little bit closer; we could go ( 3.01 ), but then we might want to get even closer to 3, ( 3.001 ). Every time we get closer and closer to 3, we're going to get a better approximation for—or we're going to get a better sense of what we are actually approaching.

So, let's get a calculator out and do this. And you could keep going ( 2.99999999 ), ( 3.0001 ). Now, one key idea here to point out before I even calculate what these are going to be: sometimes when people say the limit from both sides, or the limit from the left, or the limit from the right, they imagine that the limit from the left is negative values and the limit from the right are positive values. But as you can see here, the limit from the left are to the left of the x value that you're trying to find the limit at. So these aren't negative values; these are just approaching the 3 right over here from values less than 3. This is approaching the 3 from values larger than 3.

So now let's fill out this table, and I'm speeding up my work so that you don't have to sit through me typing everything into a calculator. So based on what we're seeing here, I would make the estimate that this looks like it's approaching ( 1.8 ). So is this equal to ( 1.8 )? As I said, in the future, we're going to be able to find this out exactly. But if you're not sure about this, you could try even closer and closer and closer values.

More Articles

View All
How Innovative Tech Helps Fight California’s Drought | National Geographic
We know that we’re in some say once in a 1200e drought right now. We don’t know when we’re going to come out of this. If we don’t do this kind of mapping, you know your average non-scientist or citizen isn’t going to know what’s going on unless we can bri…
Khan Academy Live: SAT Writing
Hello and welcome back to Khan Academy live SAT. I’m Eric, I’m an SAT tutor and one of the SAT experts here at Khan Academy. Today is our third and final class as a part of this series. We’ve covered SAT Math two weeks ago, last week we covered SAT Readin…
Accelerate Your Career With These 15 Unbeatable Skills
What if we told you that how far you climb up the corporate ladder has nothing to do with your competency? Your boss proves it. And although you can’t fake your way all the way to the top, the majority of competent people get stuck much lower in the hiera…
Halle Bailey Sits Down with Nat Geo Explorer Aliyah Griffith | National Geographic
[Music] Hey there! I’m Deborah Adams Simmons from National Geographic. Today I’m here at the Seas with Nemo and Friends in Epcot, and I’m thrilled to be hanging out with National Geographic Explorer and marine scientist Aaliyah Griffith and Miss Hallie Ba…
5 realistic side hustles for an extra $500-$1000/month
If you’re looking for a realistic video about some side hustle ideas without the purpose of selling you courses on how to get rich, you’re in the right place. You see, because most of the videos you see online talk about various side hustle options and th…
Integration by parts: definite integrals | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Going to do in this video is try to evaluate the definite integral from 0 to pi of x cosine of x dx. Like always, pause this video and see if you can evaluate it yourself. Well, when you immediately look at this, it’s not obvious how you just straight up…