yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Approximating limits using tables | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

This video we're going to try to get a sense of what the limit as x approaches 3 of ( x^3 - 3x^2 ) over ( 5x - 15 ) is. And when I say get a sense, we're going to do that by seeing what values for this expression we get as x gets closer and closer to 3. Now, one thing that you might want to try out is: well, what happens to this expression when x is equal to 3?

Well then, it's going to be ( 3^3 - 3 \times 3^2 ) over ( 5 \times 3 - 15 ). So at ( x = 3 ), this expression is going to be, and see, the numerator we have ( 27 - 27 = 0 ) over ( 15 - 15 = 0 ). So this expression is actually not defined at ( x = 3 ). We get this indeterminate form; we get ( 0/0 ).

But let's see, even though the function, even though the expression is not defined, let's see if we can get a sense of what the limit might be. And to do that, I'm going to set up a table. So let me set up a table here, and actually, I'm going to set up two tables. So this is ( x ), and this is ( \frac{x^3 - 3x^2}{5x - 15} ). And actually, I'm going to do that again, and I'll tell you why in a second. So this is going to be ( x ), and this is ( \frac{x^3 - 3x^2}{5x - 15} ).

The reason why I set up two tables, I didn't have to do two tables; I could have done it all in one table. But hopefully, this will make it a little bit more intuitive. What I'm trying to do is on this left table, I'm going to let's try out x values that get closer and closer to 3 from the left, from values that are less than 3. So for example, we go to ( 2.9 ) and figure out what the expression equals when ( x ) is ( 2.9 ). But then we could try to get even a little bit closer than that; we could go to ( 2.99 ), and then we could go even closer than that; we could go to ( 2.999 ).

One way to think about it here is, as we try to figure out what this expression equals as we get closer and closer to 3, we're trying to approximate the limit from the left. So, limit from the left. And why do I say the left? Well, if you think about this on a coordinate plane, these are the x values that are to the left of 3, but we're getting closer and closer and closer, we're moving to the right. But these are the x values that are on the left side of 3; they're less than 3.

But we also, in order for the limit to exist, we have to be approaching the same thing from both sides, from both the left and the right. So we could also try to approximate the limit from the right. And so what values would those be? Well, those would be x values larger than 3. So we could say ( 3.1 ), but then we might want to get a little bit closer; we could go ( 3.01 ), but then we might want to get even closer to 3, ( 3.001 ). Every time we get closer and closer to 3, we're going to get a better approximation for—or we're going to get a better sense of what we are actually approaching.

So, let's get a calculator out and do this. And you could keep going ( 2.99999999 ), ( 3.0001 ). Now, one key idea here to point out before I even calculate what these are going to be: sometimes when people say the limit from both sides, or the limit from the left, or the limit from the right, they imagine that the limit from the left is negative values and the limit from the right are positive values. But as you can see here, the limit from the left are to the left of the x value that you're trying to find the limit at. So these aren't negative values; these are just approaching the 3 right over here from values less than 3. This is approaching the 3 from values larger than 3.

So now let's fill out this table, and I'm speeding up my work so that you don't have to sit through me typing everything into a calculator. So based on what we're seeing here, I would make the estimate that this looks like it's approaching ( 1.8 ). So is this equal to ( 1.8 )? As I said, in the future, we're going to be able to find this out exactly. But if you're not sure about this, you could try even closer and closer and closer values.

More Articles

View All
Revolutionizing the Way We Grow Food | Nat Geo Live
( intro music ) Caleb Harper: My talk is about how to solve the global food crisis. Technology and seed is for an adverse world. What if you had a perfect world? Researching this, for me, took me to a place of learning about Mir Space Station. You know, …
Ruby Jean's Juicery | Black Travel Across America
That same spirit is alive and healthy today all over this city. Black owned spaces have a knack for preserving our past while nurturing the future. So you brought her in? Case in point, Ruby Jean’s Juicery, which combines nutritious food with family root…
Why your life is so boring
When we think about our life, we usually think about it in the form of a story. You know, first we were born, and then we did some things and made some memories, and now we’re here and we work in our job or whatever. But in the future, we plan on doing mo…
Inside the Real Black Hawk Down | No Man Left Behind
So the overall mission in Somalia was really a relief operation. We were providing security for the relief organizations who were there trying to distribute food to the starving Somali. Aded was the warlord of the day, so he stepped in and started attacki…
The Science of the Friend Zone
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And today we’re going to talk about the science of the friend zone. You know, the experience of liking someone and then finding out that they would rather just be friends with you. Why does it happen? If there’s hope of escaping…
Probability for a geometric random variable | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Jeremiah makes 25% of the three-point shots he attempts, far better than my percentage for warmup. Jeremiah likes to shoot three-point shots until he successfully makes one. All right, this is a telltale sign of geometric random variables. How many trial…