yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Jeremy Rifkin on the Fall of Capitalism and the Internet of Things | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

We are just beginning to glimpse the bare outlines of an emerging new economic system, the collaborative commons. This is the first new economic paradigm to emerge on the world scene since the advent of capitalism and socialism in the early 19th century. So it's a remarkable historical event. It has long-term implications for society.

But what's really interesting is the trigger that's giving birth to this new economic system. The trigger is something called zero marginal cost. Now, marginal costs are the costs of producing an additional unit of a good and service after your fixed costs are covered. Business people are all aware of marginal costs; most of the public isn't. But this idea of zero marginal cost is going to dramatically and intimately affect every single person in the world in the coming years in every aspect of their life.

There's a paradox deeply embedded in the very heart of the capitalist market system, previously really undisclosed. This paradox has been responsible for the tremendous success of capitalism over the last two centuries. But here's the irony: the very success of this paradox is now leading to an end game and a new paradigm emerging out of capitalism, which is the collaborative commons.

Let me explain. In a traditional market, sellers are always constantly probing for new technologies that can increase their productivity and reduce their marginal costs so they can put out cheaper products, win over consumers, gain market share, beat out their competitors, and bring some profit back to investors. So, business people are always looking for ways to increase productivity and reduce their marginal cost. They simply never expected, in their wildest dreams, that there would be a technology revolution so powerful in its productivity that it might reduce those margins of cost to near zero, making goods and services essentially free, priceless, and beyond the market exchange economy.

That's now beginning to happen in the real world. The first inklings of this zero marginal cost phenomenon was with the inception of the World Wide Web from 1990 until 2014. We saw this zero marginal cost phenomenon invade the newspaper industry, the magazine industry, and book publishing. With the coming of the World Wide Web and the Internet, all of a sudden millions of people, then hundreds of millions of people, and now 40 percent of the human race with very cheap cell phones and computers are sending audio, video, and texting each other at near zero marginal cost.

So what's happened is millions of consumers became prosumers with the advent of the Internet. They are producing and sharing their own videos, their own news blogs, their own entertainment, and their own knowledge with each other in these lateral networks at near zero marginal costs and essentially for free, bypassing the capitalist market in many instances altogether.

This zero marginal cost phenomenon, as it invaded the information industries, wreaked havoc on big, big industries. Newspapers went out of business; they couldn't compete with near zero marginal costs. Magazines went out of business. And my own industry, publishing, has been just wracked by free e-books and free knowledge and information.

But, you know, the strange thing about it is that at first, a lot of industry watchers said this is a good thing because if we give out more and more information goods free and people are producing and sharing it free, these freemiums will stimulate people's appetite to want premiums and then upgrade this free goods and information by getting more customized information.

I'll give you an example. Musicians give away their music for free when they started to see this happen, hoping that they would get a big loyal fan repertoire and then their fans would be enticed to go to their concerts and pay premium in order to be there in person. And then, of course, we saw this with newspapers. The New York Times will give you ten free articles a month, freemiums, hoping that you'll then upgrade to premiums and buy their subscription service.

It didn't happen on any large scale. This was very na...

More Articles

View All
Solving equations by graphing: word problems | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
We’re told to study the growth of bacteria. A scientist measures the area in square millimeters occupied by a sample population. The growth of the population can be modeled by ( f(t) = 24 \times e^{0.4t} ) where ( t ) is the number of hours since the expe…
Your Guide to San Francisco | National Geographic
[Narrator] San Francisco is a rush. A rush of art, flavors, history, and innovation. (funky rhythmic music) It’s all packed into a seven-by-seven-mile square, between the Pacific Ocean and the San Francisco Bay. The city has long attracted trailblazers an…
How a Woman's Donated Body Became a Digital Cadaver | National Geographic
I’m not afraid of death. This is a healer; this can be a friend. When you’re in constant agonizing pain, when you put me on your meat table, you would be shocked because I have read all the words running across my body from my head to my toes, wiggling tr…
Uncut Interview with Sam Altman on Masters of Scale [Audio]
Hey, how’s it going? This is Craig Cannon, and you’re listening to Y Combinator’s podcast. So today, we have an uncut interview from the Masters of Scale podcast, and in it, Reed Hoffman, the co-founder of LinkedIn, interviews Sam Altman. All right, here …
Le Chȃtelier’s principle: Changing volume | Equilibrium | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
The Chatelier’s principle says that if a stress is applied to a reaction mixture at equilibrium, the net reaction goes in the direction that relieves the stress. One possible stress that we could do is to change the volume on a reaction at equilibrium. L…
Money personalities | Financial goals | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
So let’s talk a little bit about money personalities and take it all with a grain of salt. Anytime I see any of these personality tests that try to classify you in one way or another, I’m like, I’m a complex human being. I have many different facets to my…