yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Jeremy Rifkin on the Fall of Capitalism and the Internet of Things | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

We are just beginning to glimpse the bare outlines of an emerging new economic system, the collaborative commons. This is the first new economic paradigm to emerge on the world scene since the advent of capitalism and socialism in the early 19th century. So it's a remarkable historical event. It has long-term implications for society.

But what's really interesting is the trigger that's giving birth to this new economic system. The trigger is something called zero marginal cost. Now, marginal costs are the costs of producing an additional unit of a good and service after your fixed costs are covered. Business people are all aware of marginal costs; most of the public isn't. But this idea of zero marginal cost is going to dramatically and intimately affect every single person in the world in the coming years in every aspect of their life.

There's a paradox deeply embedded in the very heart of the capitalist market system, previously really undisclosed. This paradox has been responsible for the tremendous success of capitalism over the last two centuries. But here's the irony: the very success of this paradox is now leading to an end game and a new paradigm emerging out of capitalism, which is the collaborative commons.

Let me explain. In a traditional market, sellers are always constantly probing for new technologies that can increase their productivity and reduce their marginal costs so they can put out cheaper products, win over consumers, gain market share, beat out their competitors, and bring some profit back to investors. So, business people are always looking for ways to increase productivity and reduce their marginal cost. They simply never expected, in their wildest dreams, that there would be a technology revolution so powerful in its productivity that it might reduce those margins of cost to near zero, making goods and services essentially free, priceless, and beyond the market exchange economy.

That's now beginning to happen in the real world. The first inklings of this zero marginal cost phenomenon was with the inception of the World Wide Web from 1990 until 2014. We saw this zero marginal cost phenomenon invade the newspaper industry, the magazine industry, and book publishing. With the coming of the World Wide Web and the Internet, all of a sudden millions of people, then hundreds of millions of people, and now 40 percent of the human race with very cheap cell phones and computers are sending audio, video, and texting each other at near zero marginal cost.

So what's happened is millions of consumers became prosumers with the advent of the Internet. They are producing and sharing their own videos, their own news blogs, their own entertainment, and their own knowledge with each other in these lateral networks at near zero marginal costs and essentially for free, bypassing the capitalist market in many instances altogether.

This zero marginal cost phenomenon, as it invaded the information industries, wreaked havoc on big, big industries. Newspapers went out of business; they couldn't compete with near zero marginal costs. Magazines went out of business. And my own industry, publishing, has been just wracked by free e-books and free knowledge and information.

But, you know, the strange thing about it is that at first, a lot of industry watchers said this is a good thing because if we give out more and more information goods free and people are producing and sharing it free, these freemiums will stimulate people's appetite to want premiums and then upgrade this free goods and information by getting more customized information.

I'll give you an example. Musicians give away their music for free when they started to see this happen, hoping that they would get a big loyal fan repertoire and then their fans would be enticed to go to their concerts and pay premium in order to be there in person. And then, of course, we saw this with newspapers. The New York Times will give you ten free articles a month, freemiums, hoping that you'll then upgrade to premiums and buy their subscription service.

It didn't happen on any large scale. This was very na...

More Articles

View All
2015 AP Physics 1 free response 1a
Two blocks are connected by a string of negligible mass that passes over a massless pulley that turns with negligible friction. It is shown in the figure above. We see that the mass M2 of block 2 is greater than the mass M1 of block 1. The blocks are rele…
Multiplying and dividing decimals by 10
We’ve already learned that when we multiply by ten, let’s say we took the number 53 and we were to multiply it by ten, it has the effect of shifting all the digits one place to the left. So this should be a review for you, but this was going to be 530. We…
Place value blocks | Math | 4th grade | Khan Academy
What number is shown by the place value blocks? So here we have several sets of place value blocks, some with many, many, many blocks, and some with just single blocks stacked on top of each other. We want to know what number is represented by all of the…
Jamie Dimon: A "Storm is Brewing" in the US Economy
Will have other consequences possibly down the road, you know, called inflation, which may not go away like people expect. So when I look at the range of possible outcomes, you know, you can have that soft landing. I’m a little more worried that it may no…
What is Breakthrough Starshot?
The closest star system to our own Sun is Alpha Centauri, and nearly 4.5 light-years away from the Sun, they consist of three stars: Alpha Centauri A and B, who happen to form a binary star system as they orbit around each other in a cosmic dance. In Alph…
Be Wary of Solving a Small, Rare Problem - Des Traynor of Intercom
How did you meet your co-founder and decide to get going? Sure. So I was originally a computer science student, and I started a PhD. You know, my PhD was an attempt to see if we could automatically measure how good a programmer is, basically. So I put so…