yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Calculating residual example | Exploring bivariate numerical data | AP Statistics | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

VI rents bicycles to tourists. She recorded the height in centimeters of each customer and the frame size in centimeters of the bicycle that customer rented. After plotting her results, she noticed that the relationship between the two variables was fairly linear. So she used the data to calculate the following least squares regression equation for predicting bicycle frame size from the height of the customer.

And this is the equation. So before even looking at this question, let's just think about what she did. She had a bunch of customers and she recorded, given the height of the customer, what size frame that person rented.

So she might have had something like this, where in the horizontal axis, you have height measured in centimeters, and in the vertical axis, you have frame size that's also measured in centimeters. There might have been someone who measures 100 cm in height who gets a 25 cm frame. I don't know if that's reasonable or not for you bicycle experts, but let's just go with it.

And so she would have plotted it there. Maybe there was another person of 100 cm in height who got a frame that was slightly larger, and she plotted it there. Then she did a least squares regression. A least squares regression is trying to fit a line to this data. Oftentimes you would use a spreadsheet or use a computer, and that line is trying to minimize the square of the distance between these points.

The least squares regression, maybe it would look something like this. This is just a rough estimate of it. It might look something, let me get my ruler tool, it might look something like this. So let me plot it. So that would be the line. Our regression line, Y hat, is equal to 1/3 + 13x.

You could view this as a way of predicting or either modeling the relationship or predicting that, hey, if I get a new person, I could take their height, input it as an X, and figure out what frame size they're likely to rent. But they ask us, what is the residual of a customer with a height of 155 cm who rents a bike with a 51 cm frame?

So how do we think about this? Well, the residual is going to be the difference between what they actually produced and what the line, what our regression line would have predicted. So we could say residual, let me write it this way: the residual is going to be actual minus predicted.

If predicted is larger than actual, this is actually going to be a negative number. If predicted is smaller than actual, there's going to be a positive number. Well, we know the actual; they tell us that. They tell us that the 155 cm person rents a bike with a 51 cm frame. So this is 51 cm.

But what is the predicted? Well, that's where we can use our regression equation that VI came up with. The predicted, I'll do that in orange, the predicted is going to be equal to 1/3 + 1/3 * their height. Their height is 155. That's the predicted Y hat, that's what our linear regression predicts.

So what is this going to be? This is going to be equal to 1/3 + 155 over 3, which is equal to 156 over 3, which comes out nicely to 52. So the predicted on our line is 52.

So here, this person is 155. We can plot them right over here, 155. They're coming in slightly below the line. So they're coming in slightly below the line right there, and that distance, which we can see that they are below the line, means the residual is going to be negative.

So this is going to be negative 1. If we were to zoom in right over here, you can't see it that well, but let me draw. So if we zoom in, let's say we were to zoom in on the line, and it looks like this, and our data point is right over here. We know we're below the line, and it's just going to be a negative residual.

The magnitude of that residual is how far we are below the line, and in this case, it is -1. That is our residual—this is what actual data minus what was predicted by our regression line.

More Articles

View All
Kevin O'Leary | 40 Years Of Photography
I get asked so often about my interest in photography: where did it come from? Why do I do it? Well, let me explain. When I was graduating high school, I told my stepfather, “I really want to become a photographer because I just learned how to develop fil…
Take Accountability to Earn Equity
Accountability is important because that’s how you’re going to get leverage. That’s how you’re going to get credibility. It’s also how you’re going to get equity. You’re gonna get a piece of the business when you’re negotiating with other people. Ultimat…
Desert Monster Tries to Survive in the American Southwest | National Geographic
The Gila monster is the most charismatic reptile we have in Arizona, for sure. We have seen temperatures increasing in the Tucson area. Gila monsters, you know, depend on humidity, and if humidity goes down lower earlier in the season, that could affect t…
Sky Sharks: Shark Surveillance | SharkFest | National Geographic
[MUSIC PLAYING] NARRATOR: Great whites grow up to 20 feet long and can pack over 5,000 pounds of muscle. [MUSIC PLAYING] Yet, despite their size, they often go unnoticed. A type of camouflage known as counter shading gives these sharks the predatory edge…
Writing a quadratic function from solutions | Algebra 1 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
We’re told a quadratic function ( f ) has two real solutions ( x = -3 ) and ( x = 5 ) that make ( f(x) = 0 ). Select the equations that could define ( f ) in standard form. So, pause this video and have a go at that before we do this together. All right,…
Taxes vs Duty (Clip) | To Catch a Smuggler | National Geographic
You purchased this. We have to add this up. All right. So how much is this adding up to? Do you understand? Well, that’s one side. It’s got to go on the other side. There’s exact prices of how much she paid. She has ten. $15,000 worth of gold. Are you …