yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How to win a negotiation | Chris Voss, Dan Shapiro & more | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

CHRIS VOSS: Everybody has cards they're not showing in a negotiation. Everybody.

DAYMOND JOHN: Understanding that when you're negotiating, it's what's in it for the other party as well, and it's not just self-serving.

DANIEL H PINK: The key here is that we tend to think that persuasion or motivation is something that one person does to another.

KEVIN ZOLLMAN: In such a situation oftentimes the best strategy is very counterintuitive because it involves flipping a coin, rolling a dice, or doing something random.

DAN SHAPIRO: So the classic approach to negotiation is positional bargaining. In positional bargaining, I have a position, you have a position, and we haggle over those positions. Now, the rules to positional bargaining are very clear. You start with an extreme demand, but not so extreme that the other side thinks that you're crazy or bluffing. You concede stubbornly, and you demonstrate a greater willingness than the other side to walk away from the negotiation table.

FREDRIK EKLUND: It's very important to set a floor and a ceiling so you know where to move. Because if you don't, you can be manipulated, and you can lose yourself in the emotions. If you're a good negotiator, you will obviously try at least to be completely disconnected emotionally from the deal and negotiation itself, although you will play emotional. So if you're not upset, you can play upset. But none of that matters unless you don't have a floor and a ceiling. So you need to know if you go under the floor, you need to walk out or end the negotiation.

KEVIN ZOLLMAN: One of the things that game theorists have found is that in negotiation, especially in negotiations where we're debating how to divide up some resource—classic example in game theory is dividing up a pie, but it could be anything like money or some time with a toy or anything where we have to decide how to divide it up. Game theorists have discovered a couple of central principles that make a big difference to who does better in those negotiations. One of the critical things is how patient you are. How willing you are to stay and continue to negotiate. So if I come in in a rush to a car dealership and I say I need a car right now, everyone knows that the car dealer is going to try and take advantage of the fact that you need a car right now and say sorry, we can't give you a discount. But if you come into a car dealership and you say I don't need a car anytime soon. If you give me a good deal today, I'll take it, but if you don't, I'll leave. Maybe I'll come back tomorrow, maybe the next day, maybe a month later. Then you'll get a better deal.

SHAPIRO: However, this probably isn't the best agreement that you could have come to. All this is doing is arguing over one single factor, a number. And that's the problem of positional bargaining is that I might have a lot of other interests at stake, but none of them are getting shared within this very strict form of positional bargaining. There's another form of negotiation that at the Harvard Negotiation Project some of my colleagues have developed; we call it interest based negotiation. The idea here is let's not argue over positions. Let's argue over underlying interests.

SALLIE KRAWCHECK: Never have one ask and take no for an answer. That if you're told no on the raise or even if you're told yes, come in with 12 other requests. I want to take a coding class that the company pays for. I want to have a stint in marketing. I want to work overseas for a period of time. I want to be mentored by XYZ. I want to work on this big project. I want to, I want to, I want to. And if by number 20, typically your boss is going to say yes to something that can turn into professional advancement or money down the road.

DAYMOND JOHN: Understanding that when you're negotiating is what's in it for the other party as well and it's not just self-serving. A lot of times people just don't ask the right questions. Instead, they're just stating what they want instead of saying how can this situation be better. What do you need for this situation or what are your obstacles.

More Articles

View All
Seth Klarman's Warning for "The Everything Bubble"
The first thing is, we’ve been in an everything bubble. I think that a lot of money has flowed into virtually everything. You’ve had speculation during that bubble in all kinds of things from crypto to meme stocks to SPACs. That day is Seth Klam, and he …
2 step estimation word problems
We are told that a race car driver has 28 cars. Each car has four tires. He has to replace all the tires on the cars. He has 22 tires right now. Estimate the total number of tires he needs to buy. So pause this video and see if you can do that. And the ke…
Using the logarithm change of base rule | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
So we have two different logarithmic expressions here, one in yellow and one in this pinkish color. What I want you to do, like always, is pause the video and see if you can rewrite each of these logarithmic expressions in a simpler way. I’ll give you a …
Eat the Top 15 Most Mind-Blowing Sushi with Lucas Sin in Tokyo's Best Omakase | Best of the World
Lucas: It’s like a sunset. Of tuna. The producers told me that I was going to be interacting and eating sushi in some way. The rarity, the specialness of the experience was not conveyed and could not have been conveyed. Here we are in Tokyo. Just got off…
Environmental change and adaptation in Galápagos finches | Middle school biology | Khan Academy
This here is a picture of the ground finch of the Galapagos Islands, and one of its primary sources of food is seeds that it finds on the ground. If we go back to 1976, we can look at the distribution of beak depths, and these beak depths I would assume a…
Input approach to determining comparative advantage | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
In other videos, we have already looked at production possibility curves and output tables in order to calculate opportunity costs of producing a certain product in a certain country. Then we use that to think about comparative advantage. We’re going to d…