yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Game theory can explain humanity’s biggest problem | Steven Pinker


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.
  • The ideals of the Enlightenment—that we can use knowledge to improve human well-being—aren't particularly natural. For most of our history and pre-history, there was no knowledge that you could act on to do things like reduce infection, reduce tribal warfare, or to extend life. Until recently, that would've been a crazy thing even to hope for. So it's not intuitive, and there's always a tendency toward backsliding.

For example, there's the blowing off of scientific findings, of the efficacy of vaccines, the reality of climate change. The war in Ukraine, another bloating of enlightenment values: the idea that the ultimate good is the lives of people. For Putin, maybe several hundreds of thousands of people dying, their schools, their hospitals, their apartments reduced to rubble, a small price to pay for the glory and the avenging of the humiliation of the Soviet Union.

We're not wired for enlightenment humanism, but nonetheless, we ought to endorse it. We ought to advance it. We ought to remind ourselves of what's so great about it. One idea that is essential to make sense of our current predicament comes from ‘game theory.’

Game theory is: What's the rational thing to do if you are in a situation where the outcome depends on what other rational people do. And the ‘Tragedy of the Commons’ is a game-theoretical predicament where what everyone does that's rational for them leaves everyone worse off when everyone does it. There are lots of situations in which tragedies of the commons confront us: If I wait for the bus in the rain instead of driving my SUV, I'm not gonna save the climate, so it makes sense for me to take the SUV. Well, if everyone thinks that, then we're all in danger of being cooked.

An additional arena in which that we have a tragedy of the commons is rationality itself. You got a person who thinks, "Should I believe this, or should I believe that? Well, if I believe this, I will be a hero in all the people that matter to me." Another member of the group thinks that and another member, and they all think, "Well, if you doubt that, then you're making us look kind of stupid and evil."

And if everyone believes that, then you can have two sides, each of which is kind of individually rational in the sense that each one gets the respect of his buddies, his pals, his colleagues, but the whole society is worse off because you just have warring tribes instead of a joint search for the truth. In the case of the rationality comments, you want the commitment to truth as more important than a slogan that makes your side look good in order for everyone to enjoy what is objectively good for everyone.

With all of the threats from the identitarian left and the populist right and the nationalist leaders and the religious fundamentalists, is there any hope? Civilization, in general, tends to drift slowly in directions of greater rationality. Our science really does know more than it did 50 years ago or 100 years ago. A lot of superstitious beliefs have been marginalized. Not just factual beliefs, but moral beliefs.

Slavery, thank goodness we don't have that debate anymore, but 150 years ago our country did. Disenfranchising women, criminalizing homosexuality, segregation of schools. The list goes on of things where we really have made progress.

Humanistic values have a kind of built-in advantage when you think about them in that they're the only things that you can defend when you have a negotiation with someone who is like you.

We'd all rather be alive than dead. We'd rather be healthy than sick. We'd rather be educated than ignorant and illiterate. There's a long list of things that we share because we are human, despite all of our differences in race and religion and ethnicity and nationality—enlightenment humanism is just appealing to that common humanity. It's not particularly intuitive, but it always has that built-in advantage.

  • Get smarter, faster with videos from the world's biggest thinkers. To learn even more from the world's biggest thinkers, get Big Think+ for your business...

More Articles

View All
Should Airships Make A Comeback?
Airships seem like a bad idea. Exhibit A. (bright upbeat music) It’s the greatest of miracles that anyone came out of the disaster alive. The Hindenberg was filled with over 200 million liters of hydrogen, but it also had an iron oxide and aluminum powd…
Addition and subtraction with number lines | 2nd grade | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] Which number line shows 47 plus 22? Let’s see, in this first number line we’re starting at 47, then we add 20 to get to 67. And then we add two to get to 69. So if you add 20, and then you’re adding two, you’re adding 22. So this one seems r…
the moon is leaving
If you applied a coat of paint to the bottom of your shoes every single day, one coat on top of the other, every morning, you would leave Earth just as quickly as our moon is leaving us. Every day, the moon moves about a tenth of a millimeter away from Ea…
Warren Buffett: When to Sell a Stock
The question I want to answer in this video is probably the single most difficult question in all of investing: When is the perfect time to sell a stock? Countless books have been written and videos have been made on when the right time to buy a stock is.…
War is Madness | A Stoic Warning to the World
Man, naturally the gentlest class of being, is not ashamed to revel in the blood of others, to wage war, and to entrust the waging of war to his sons, when even dumb beasts and wild beasts keep the peace with one another. The ancient Greeks and Romans wer…
Taoism & The Underestimated Power of Softness
The rigid and stiff will be broken. The soft and yielding will overcome. Lao Tzu. Generally, people admire strength and look down on weakness. We associate strength with being firm and energetic. Strength allows us to accomplish things, fight back agains…