yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Game theory can explain humanity’s biggest problem | Steven Pinker


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.
  • The ideals of the Enlightenment—that we can use knowledge to improve human well-being—aren't particularly natural. For most of our history and pre-history, there was no knowledge that you could act on to do things like reduce infection, reduce tribal warfare, or to extend life. Until recently, that would've been a crazy thing even to hope for. So it's not intuitive, and there's always a tendency toward backsliding.

For example, there's the blowing off of scientific findings, of the efficacy of vaccines, the reality of climate change. The war in Ukraine, another bloating of enlightenment values: the idea that the ultimate good is the lives of people. For Putin, maybe several hundreds of thousands of people dying, their schools, their hospitals, their apartments reduced to rubble, a small price to pay for the glory and the avenging of the humiliation of the Soviet Union.

We're not wired for enlightenment humanism, but nonetheless, we ought to endorse it. We ought to advance it. We ought to remind ourselves of what's so great about it. One idea that is essential to make sense of our current predicament comes from ‘game theory.’

Game theory is: What's the rational thing to do if you are in a situation where the outcome depends on what other rational people do. And the ‘Tragedy of the Commons’ is a game-theoretical predicament where what everyone does that's rational for them leaves everyone worse off when everyone does it. There are lots of situations in which tragedies of the commons confront us: If I wait for the bus in the rain instead of driving my SUV, I'm not gonna save the climate, so it makes sense for me to take the SUV. Well, if everyone thinks that, then we're all in danger of being cooked.

An additional arena in which that we have a tragedy of the commons is rationality itself. You got a person who thinks, "Should I believe this, or should I believe that? Well, if I believe this, I will be a hero in all the people that matter to me." Another member of the group thinks that and another member, and they all think, "Well, if you doubt that, then you're making us look kind of stupid and evil."

And if everyone believes that, then you can have two sides, each of which is kind of individually rational in the sense that each one gets the respect of his buddies, his pals, his colleagues, but the whole society is worse off because you just have warring tribes instead of a joint search for the truth. In the case of the rationality comments, you want the commitment to truth as more important than a slogan that makes your side look good in order for everyone to enjoy what is objectively good for everyone.

With all of the threats from the identitarian left and the populist right and the nationalist leaders and the religious fundamentalists, is there any hope? Civilization, in general, tends to drift slowly in directions of greater rationality. Our science really does know more than it did 50 years ago or 100 years ago. A lot of superstitious beliefs have been marginalized. Not just factual beliefs, but moral beliefs.

Slavery, thank goodness we don't have that debate anymore, but 150 years ago our country did. Disenfranchising women, criminalizing homosexuality, segregation of schools. The list goes on of things where we really have made progress.

Humanistic values have a kind of built-in advantage when you think about them in that they're the only things that you can defend when you have a negotiation with someone who is like you.

We'd all rather be alive than dead. We'd rather be healthy than sick. We'd rather be educated than ignorant and illiterate. There's a long list of things that we share because we are human, despite all of our differences in race and religion and ethnicity and nationality—enlightenment humanism is just appealing to that common humanity. It's not particularly intuitive, but it always has that built-in advantage.

  • Get smarter, faster with videos from the world's biggest thinkers. To learn even more from the world's biggest thinkers, get Big Think+ for your business...

More Articles

View All
Zuckerberg and Senator Hawley clash in fiery child safety hearing
Mr. Zuckerberg, let me start with you. Did I hear you say in your opening statement that there’s no link between mental health and social media use? Senator, what I said is I think it’s important to look at the science. I know it’s people widely talk abo…
INSANE BEATBOX and Other MOUTH NOISES -- BOAT
Here’s a guy whose mouth can sound like an engine. And this woman can be a human car alarm. But are those the best mouth noises of all-time? And better yet, what happened to my beard? Well, to figure out the answer to this one, you’ll have to wait for ‘Th…
Impact of changes to trophic pyramids | High school biology | Khan Academy
What we see here is known as a trophic pyramid, and the word “trophic” in a biology context is referring to food relationships. So, one way to think about this is that it tells us who is eating whom and who is producing energy, and then who is able to lev…
It grows from the barrel of a gun
Chairman now said every communist must grasp the truth: political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. The power of the state is, of course, political, so Chairman Mao could have said that the power of the state grows out of the barrel of a gun. Is thi…
The Sacrifice of Cassini | Cosmos: Possible Worlds
[Ethereal music] Why do some worlds have rings and others don’t? Why no rings for Earth or Mars? We wouldn’t recognize Saturn without them. He looks naked without his rings. But how did he get them in the first place? This is exactly what the French astr…
Writing a quadratic when given the vertex and another point | Algebra 1 (TX TEKS) | Khan Academy
We’re told a quadratic function f has a vertex at (-4, 7) and passes through the point (-2, -5). Write an equation for f in vertex form. So pause this video and try to work that out before we do that together. All right, so first let’s think about the ge…