yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Game theory can explain humanity’s biggest problem | Steven Pinker


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.
  • The ideals of the Enlightenment—that we can use knowledge to improve human well-being—aren't particularly natural. For most of our history and pre-history, there was no knowledge that you could act on to do things like reduce infection, reduce tribal warfare, or to extend life. Until recently, that would've been a crazy thing even to hope for. So it's not intuitive, and there's always a tendency toward backsliding.

For example, there's the blowing off of scientific findings, of the efficacy of vaccines, the reality of climate change. The war in Ukraine, another bloating of enlightenment values: the idea that the ultimate good is the lives of people. For Putin, maybe several hundreds of thousands of people dying, their schools, their hospitals, their apartments reduced to rubble, a small price to pay for the glory and the avenging of the humiliation of the Soviet Union.

We're not wired for enlightenment humanism, but nonetheless, we ought to endorse it. We ought to advance it. We ought to remind ourselves of what's so great about it. One idea that is essential to make sense of our current predicament comes from ‘game theory.’

Game theory is: What's the rational thing to do if you are in a situation where the outcome depends on what other rational people do. And the ‘Tragedy of the Commons’ is a game-theoretical predicament where what everyone does that's rational for them leaves everyone worse off when everyone does it. There are lots of situations in which tragedies of the commons confront us: If I wait for the bus in the rain instead of driving my SUV, I'm not gonna save the climate, so it makes sense for me to take the SUV. Well, if everyone thinks that, then we're all in danger of being cooked.

An additional arena in which that we have a tragedy of the commons is rationality itself. You got a person who thinks, "Should I believe this, or should I believe that? Well, if I believe this, I will be a hero in all the people that matter to me." Another member of the group thinks that and another member, and they all think, "Well, if you doubt that, then you're making us look kind of stupid and evil."

And if everyone believes that, then you can have two sides, each of which is kind of individually rational in the sense that each one gets the respect of his buddies, his pals, his colleagues, but the whole society is worse off because you just have warring tribes instead of a joint search for the truth. In the case of the rationality comments, you want the commitment to truth as more important than a slogan that makes your side look good in order for everyone to enjoy what is objectively good for everyone.

With all of the threats from the identitarian left and the populist right and the nationalist leaders and the religious fundamentalists, is there any hope? Civilization, in general, tends to drift slowly in directions of greater rationality. Our science really does know more than it did 50 years ago or 100 years ago. A lot of superstitious beliefs have been marginalized. Not just factual beliefs, but moral beliefs.

Slavery, thank goodness we don't have that debate anymore, but 150 years ago our country did. Disenfranchising women, criminalizing homosexuality, segregation of schools. The list goes on of things where we really have made progress.

Humanistic values have a kind of built-in advantage when you think about them in that they're the only things that you can defend when you have a negotiation with someone who is like you.

We'd all rather be alive than dead. We'd rather be healthy than sick. We'd rather be educated than ignorant and illiterate. There's a long list of things that we share because we are human, despite all of our differences in race and religion and ethnicity and nationality—enlightenment humanism is just appealing to that common humanity. It's not particularly intuitive, but it always has that built-in advantage.

  • Get smarter, faster with videos from the world's biggest thinkers. To learn even more from the world's biggest thinkers, get Big Think+ for your business...

More Articles

View All
15 Reasons Why The Rich Are Getting Richer
In the past few years, the wealth gap debate has risen to be one of the hottest issues the world is facing, with many throwing out options relating to higher taxation or mass redistribution of wealth. In this piece, we’ll take a look at how the rich are g…
Presidential oversight of the bureaucracy
You can view this diagram as an org chart of the government of the United States. What we have highlighted in this blue-green color is the executive branch and the things that fall under the executive branch. You can’t even see everything; a lot of it fal…
How do QR codes work? (I built one myself to find out)
When QR codes first came out, I thought they were awful, never going to catch on. This is a flow chart from the time that really resonated with me. The problem as I saw it was that QR codes are ugly, and they mean nothing to people. I would rather just se…
Michael Burry Just Doubled Down on Stocks
As you all know, Michael Barry, depicted in The Big Short by Christian Bale, made his millions by betting against the U.S. housing market in the lead-up to the 2008 global financial crisis by buying credit default swaps on doomed mortgage-backed securitie…
Advanced (plural) possession | The Apostrophe | Punctuation | Khan Academy
Hello Garans, hello David, hello Paige. So today we’re going to talk about plural possession, meaning when more than one person, or thing, or animal owns something else. This, like most other types of possession, tends to involve apostrophes. Makes sens…
Relative maxima and minima worked example
This is the Khan Academy exercise on relative maxima and minima, and they ask us to mark all the relative maximum points in the graph. Like always, pause this video and see if you can figure out which are the relative maximum points. Okay, now let’s work…