yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The brain myth that won’t die | Lisa Feldman Barrett


4m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Brains are the most expensive organ we have in our whole body. Brains cost about 20 percent of our metabolic budget, and they're only three pounds in size. So they're really, really expensive. I sort of wondered, well, why? Why did brains evolve in the first place? Like, what is a brain good for?

The triune brain is this idea that your brain evolved in three layers. You have the inner lizard brain, which is supposed to contain circuits for instincts. Layered on top of that is the limbic system, limbic meaning border, and this was supposedly evolved in ancient mammals. Then layered on top of that is the big cerebral cortex, that's supposed to be the home of circuitry for rationality. For many years, this was the kind of dominant view of brain evolution, brain function, and brain development.

Really, really, both reptiles and mammals evolved from fish. They're actually on different branches, and so the idea that you would have an inner lizard actually doesn't make any sense from an evolutionary standpoint. The only animal on this planet that has a lizard brain is a lizard.

This idea of brain evolution and brain function, actually, you can trace its roots all the way back to ancient Greece, to the philosopher Plato. Plato's idea was that the human psyche could be described as two horses and a charioteer who controlled the horses. One of the horses represented your instincts, one of the horses represented emotions, and then the charioteer who controlled them both. This morality tale really survived through millennia.

When neuroscience began as a proper scientific field, neuroscientists used this metaphor to describe the structure and function of the brain. The triune brain idea was around for a long time in popular culture, but it became really, really entrenched in a particular book that was written by Carl Sagan in 1977, called "The Dragons of Eden." That book won a Pulitzer Prize, and it was explosive in popularity. It contained the narrative of the triune brain.

Then neuroscientists developed the ability to peer deep into genetics of the cells themselves. Using molecular genetic techniques, they were able to trace the genes that helped to form these cells, and by doing this, they realized that actually the brain didn't evolve in layers. This work, which was really, I would say, established and replicated in the 1970s, really blew apart the idea that the brain developed, was structured, and functioned in sedimentary layers.

In fact, there's a common brain plan for all mammals, and maybe to some extent all vertebrates. So what differs is the length of time that each developmental stage runs for, and that's what makes it look like a mouse doesn't have a very big cerebral cortex relative to the rest of its brain, whereas it looks like we have a very big cerebral cortex relative to the size of our brains.

I think the story of brain evolution is actually the coolest story. You know, it's sort of like a science fiction story. Actually, there are creatures around today, they're called amphioxes. They almost look like little worms, but they're not worms. They have gill slits. They've been around really for 500 million years, more or less.

But what's really cool about these animals is they have no brain, they have no eyes, they have no ears, they basically have no head. They're just little stomachs on a stick. So they're really, really simple animals that manage to keep themselves alive without being able to sense anything, really, or very, very little about their environment.

I found it really interesting to understand that these creatures and creatures like them really dominated the Earth for millions of years. At some point in evolutionary history, things changed. Why did a brain evolve? How did it evolve? It turns out that scientists' best guess at the moment is that brains emerged on the evolutionary scene because at some point, one animal ate another animal. Deliberately hunted another animal.

So hunting turns animals into predators and prey, and this, scientists think, launched an arms race, or you might think of it as an eye, ear, nose, and fin race, to become more powerful predators and more efficient to avoid becoming prey. So what you see happening over evolutionary time is that all of a sudden animals start developing actual sensory systems.

When you have more sensory systems to sense at a distance and you have more motor parts that you have to coordinate, and then you have a bigger body, so you need internal organs. Now there are a lot of parts to coordinate, and that requires a brain.

It turns out that you can never really say why anything evolved. The why question is a really tough question. It's what philosophers refer to as teleology. Anything that any scientist, philosopher, or historian tells you about why something evolved is just a story. We can never really verify the truth value of that story, but we can understand something about how organs evolved.

We can also understand something about the most important functions of that organ. If you think about brains as the control center of all of these parts that have to be coordinated in a metabolically efficient way in order to survive, it turns out that metabolic efficiency is a major, major selection pressure. If your parts aren't working efficiently in a coordinated way, you don't have enough energy to do really what is your ultimate job, which is to produce offspring, to pass your genes along.

More Articles

View All
The Apple Vision Pro is Terrifying for Humanity's Future
I hate being bored, don’t you? My mind starts to wander. I stress about work, friends, and what I’ll be doing with my life in 5, 10, 20 years. I feel fidgety and uncomfortable. A study by the National Institute of Health showed that boredom can disrupt mo…
Warren Buffett Explains How To Calculate Intrinsic Value Of A Stock
Yeah, the actually Graham didn’t get too specific about intrinsic value in terms of precise calculations, but intrinsic value has come to be equated with, and I think quite properly with, what you might call private business value. Now, I’m not sure who w…
Capital vs. consumer goods and economic growth | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
We’ve learned a little bit already about how a production possibilities curve can be used to illustrate the concept of economic growth. Let’s review the definition of economic growth. Then we’re going to go into some more depth about the trade-offs that s…
Where is Scandinavia?
Scan-duh-nay-vee-ah! Look at this Arctic wonderland – fjords, saunas, fjords, lutefisk, blondes, vikings, blond vikings?, fjords, Ikea, babies in government issued boxes, Santa, death metal, and fjords. But like, where exactly are the borders of Scandina…
How To Get Ahead Of 99% Of People (Do This Now)
What’s big, guys? It’s Graham here. So, there seems to be this recent trend on YouTube of how to get ahead of 99% of people. Some of them, I’ll admit, are wildly genius and insanely insightful, while others seem like a chat GBT inspired list to the most g…
Why you shouldn't sell Real Estate part time
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So a lot of people are asking me if they can sell real estate part-time, and my quick and short answer is probably not. It’s probably not a good idea, and here’s why. You compete with people who eat, breathe, sleep, …