yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How Much Equity to Give Your Cofounder - Michael Seibel


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

How much equity to give your co-founders? This is a problem and a question that a lot of people have written about, and you can see a lot of varied advice online. My perspective is that most founders are missing a couple key points when divvying up their equity.

The first one is your equity splits with your co-founders are what's going to motivate your co-founders to stick with your company through the years and years and years it takes in order for you to build a large company that has massive impact. Oftentimes, the co-founders that you're speaking to don't quite understand how much of a time commitment they have to give to the startup if it works.

As a CEO, who's responsible for figuring out what the equity split is, oftentimes you have to think about what your co-founders would want, even if they're not thinking about their own long-term interests at the moment. One of the biggest fallacies I hear from a founder is, "We came up with this equity split because that's what we negotiated."

Well, as a great CEO, your first thought has to be not, "How do I come up with an equity split based on negotiation?" Your first thought has to be, "How do I come up with an equity split that's going to maximize the motivation of my teammates?"

If you're concerned about giving equity to teammates, that's not without reason. There are lots of startup teams that break up; there are lots of founders that leave. But your primary mechanism of safety when it comes to giving equity is vesting and a cliff.

So typically, when you give equity to anyone in your company, but including the founders, you have what's called four-year vesting. That means that you have to work at the company for four years to actually get that equity stake. Typically, also, you have what's called a one-year cliff. That means if you leave or are fired from the company within the first year, you get nothing.

So as a CEO who's trying to make sure you have a maximally motivated team, this is your hedge: vesting with the cliff. Four-year vesting with a one-year cliff is your hedge. This is your get-out-of-jail-free card if you made a decision that was incorrect about choosing your co-founders. As long as you correct it within one year, there's no long-term harm to the company.

On the flip side, because you have that hedge, it probably benefits you more often than not to be more generous with the equity that you give your co-founders, not less. Understanding that that equity is going to create long-term motivation to stick with your startup, especially during the times when you're sometimes not working well.

Almost every startup has times where things are not going well. So really what you have to think for as a CEO is, "I don't want to create a situation where I have to motivate my co-founders every day." I want their equity stake in this company to be the thing that gets them to wake up in the middle of the night, it gets them to work on the weekends, that gets them to work late, that gets them to recruit their friends.

It gets them to feel like they are true owners of the company and not just employees. I think that I don't want to prescribe exactly what equity split creates that phenomenon, but if you hit it, it's far more valuable. Your company becomes far more viable because your co-founders are all motivated.

You know, in the past I've said that most companies should have equal equity splits. I think all things being considered equal is a nice and easy rule of thumb, but it can't be applied always. So I would just always tell the CEO, be considerate about your future and motivation of your co-founders.

And if you're not really interested in the future motivation of your co-founders, if you don't think you're gonna need them in the long term, why are you making them co-founders at all? You should really reconsider who's on your team if you don't think they're worth a generous equity grant.

Thank you very much for your time.

More Articles

View All
Polar functions derivatives | Advanced derivatives | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
What we have here is the graph of r is equal to sine of two theta in polar coordinates. If polar coordinates look unfamiliar to you, or if you need to brush up on them, I encourage you to do a search for polar coordinates in Khan Academy or look at our pr…
MMOs in the Instagram Era: Highrise (S18) - YC Gaming Tech Talks 2020
Um, hi everybody! I’m Jimmy, I’m the co-founder and CTO of Pocket Worlds. We’re High-Rise, and we built High-Rise, the app which is available on iOS and Android. I think to date, it has over 5 million downloads, and we’re grossing over a million a month i…
ChatGPTIntro
Hello! So, what I’m going to do in this video alongside you is explore using ChatGPT, which I’m sure many of you have heard of. So the first question is: Why is it called ChatGPT? Well, the GPT part stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer, and I gu…
Thoughts on the nation's report card
Hi folks, Sal here from Khan Academy. Many of you all have caught wind that the National Assessment of Educational Progress just came out, also known as the NAEP or the Nation’s Report Card, and the results were not good. They were already bad pre-pandemi…
Mr. Freeman, part 62
The miracle happened, my dears. And there’s no turning back now. You were waiting for the end of the world? TAKE IT AND SIGN IT! The mechanism gave us the signs of life and began to moving. In general bustle and chaos no one noticed that… by the global br…
Water potential example | Cell structure and function | AP Biology | Khan Academy
We’re told that six identical potato core cubes were isolated from a potato. The initial weight of each cube was recorded. Each cube was then placed in one of six open beakers, each containing a different sucrose solution. The cubes remained in the beaker…