yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How Much Equity to Give Your Cofounder - Michael Seibel


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

How much equity to give your co-founders? This is a problem and a question that a lot of people have written about, and you can see a lot of varied advice online. My perspective is that most founders are missing a couple key points when divvying up their equity.

The first one is your equity splits with your co-founders are what's going to motivate your co-founders to stick with your company through the years and years and years it takes in order for you to build a large company that has massive impact. Oftentimes, the co-founders that you're speaking to don't quite understand how much of a time commitment they have to give to the startup if it works.

As a CEO, who's responsible for figuring out what the equity split is, oftentimes you have to think about what your co-founders would want, even if they're not thinking about their own long-term interests at the moment. One of the biggest fallacies I hear from a founder is, "We came up with this equity split because that's what we negotiated."

Well, as a great CEO, your first thought has to be not, "How do I come up with an equity split based on negotiation?" Your first thought has to be, "How do I come up with an equity split that's going to maximize the motivation of my teammates?"

If you're concerned about giving equity to teammates, that's not without reason. There are lots of startup teams that break up; there are lots of founders that leave. But your primary mechanism of safety when it comes to giving equity is vesting and a cliff.

So typically, when you give equity to anyone in your company, but including the founders, you have what's called four-year vesting. That means that you have to work at the company for four years to actually get that equity stake. Typically, also, you have what's called a one-year cliff. That means if you leave or are fired from the company within the first year, you get nothing.

So as a CEO who's trying to make sure you have a maximally motivated team, this is your hedge: vesting with the cliff. Four-year vesting with a one-year cliff is your hedge. This is your get-out-of-jail-free card if you made a decision that was incorrect about choosing your co-founders. As long as you correct it within one year, there's no long-term harm to the company.

On the flip side, because you have that hedge, it probably benefits you more often than not to be more generous with the equity that you give your co-founders, not less. Understanding that that equity is going to create long-term motivation to stick with your startup, especially during the times when you're sometimes not working well.

Almost every startup has times where things are not going well. So really what you have to think for as a CEO is, "I don't want to create a situation where I have to motivate my co-founders every day." I want their equity stake in this company to be the thing that gets them to wake up in the middle of the night, it gets them to work on the weekends, that gets them to work late, that gets them to recruit their friends.

It gets them to feel like they are true owners of the company and not just employees. I think that I don't want to prescribe exactly what equity split creates that phenomenon, but if you hit it, it's far more valuable. Your company becomes far more viable because your co-founders are all motivated.

You know, in the past I've said that most companies should have equal equity splits. I think all things being considered equal is a nice and easy rule of thumb, but it can't be applied always. So I would just always tell the CEO, be considerate about your future and motivation of your co-founders.

And if you're not really interested in the future motivation of your co-founders, if you don't think you're gonna need them in the long term, why are you making them co-founders at all? You should really reconsider who's on your team if you don't think they're worth a generous equity grant.

Thank you very much for your time.

More Articles

View All
YouTube vs Grey: A Ballad of Accidental Suspension
‘Twas a Sunday morning when I woke up, happy and ready for the day, when suddenly… [alarm sounding] (as YouTube bot) Your access to YouTube has been suspended. (as Grey) Wha… why? (as YouTube bot) Because of a perceived violation of the terms of servic…
Ask Sal Anything! Homeroom Thursday, July 9
Hi everyone, welcome to today’s homeroom live stream. Uh, today we will do an ask me anything, which is always fun. I enjoy it a lot. Before we dive into the questions, although I encourage you to start thinking of questions and putting them in the messag…
The Best Way to Move Mountain Goats? Helicopters. | National Geographic
[Music] [Applause] [Music] So the way we catch goats is we don’t tranquilize them at all. They just, what they do is they take a helicopter and they fly until they find a goat. They can have it in an area that’s relatively flat; they can catch it, and the…
Pitch Practice with FlavorCloud, Holly Liu, and Adora Cheung
So the next thing we’re going to do is bring up Flavor Cloud, who is going to pitch Holly, who is the investor here, and then go from there. Yep, so I guess we’re gonna be sharing. Sorry, so I’m gonna be an angel investor, and I’ve done some angel investi…
How Close Are We to Flying Cars? | How Sci-Fi Inspired Science
You’re stuck on the highway, bumper-to-bumper traffic. A commute that should have taken a few minutes has now somehow become an hour-long endeavor. And this happens. We all have one of two thoughts: one, monster truck; or two, wish I could just fly over t…
How Khan Academy is Here to Help During COVID-19
Hi everyone, Sal here from Khan Academy. Uh, as I’m sure you’re aware, we are finding ourselves collectively, our planet, in a very interesting situation right now. A lot of unfortunate things are happening, and one of those unfortunate things is the pot…