yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How Much Equity to Give Your Cofounder - Michael Seibel


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

How much equity to give your co-founders? This is a problem and a question that a lot of people have written about, and you can see a lot of varied advice online. My perspective is that most founders are missing a couple key points when divvying up their equity.

The first one is your equity splits with your co-founders are what's going to motivate your co-founders to stick with your company through the years and years and years it takes in order for you to build a large company that has massive impact. Oftentimes, the co-founders that you're speaking to don't quite understand how much of a time commitment they have to give to the startup if it works.

As a CEO, who's responsible for figuring out what the equity split is, oftentimes you have to think about what your co-founders would want, even if they're not thinking about their own long-term interests at the moment. One of the biggest fallacies I hear from a founder is, "We came up with this equity split because that's what we negotiated."

Well, as a great CEO, your first thought has to be not, "How do I come up with an equity split based on negotiation?" Your first thought has to be, "How do I come up with an equity split that's going to maximize the motivation of my teammates?"

If you're concerned about giving equity to teammates, that's not without reason. There are lots of startup teams that break up; there are lots of founders that leave. But your primary mechanism of safety when it comes to giving equity is vesting and a cliff.

So typically, when you give equity to anyone in your company, but including the founders, you have what's called four-year vesting. That means that you have to work at the company for four years to actually get that equity stake. Typically, also, you have what's called a one-year cliff. That means if you leave or are fired from the company within the first year, you get nothing.

So as a CEO who's trying to make sure you have a maximally motivated team, this is your hedge: vesting with the cliff. Four-year vesting with a one-year cliff is your hedge. This is your get-out-of-jail-free card if you made a decision that was incorrect about choosing your co-founders. As long as you correct it within one year, there's no long-term harm to the company.

On the flip side, because you have that hedge, it probably benefits you more often than not to be more generous with the equity that you give your co-founders, not less. Understanding that that equity is going to create long-term motivation to stick with your startup, especially during the times when you're sometimes not working well.

Almost every startup has times where things are not going well. So really what you have to think for as a CEO is, "I don't want to create a situation where I have to motivate my co-founders every day." I want their equity stake in this company to be the thing that gets them to wake up in the middle of the night, it gets them to work on the weekends, that gets them to work late, that gets them to recruit their friends.

It gets them to feel like they are true owners of the company and not just employees. I think that I don't want to prescribe exactly what equity split creates that phenomenon, but if you hit it, it's far more valuable. Your company becomes far more viable because your co-founders are all motivated.

You know, in the past I've said that most companies should have equal equity splits. I think all things being considered equal is a nice and easy rule of thumb, but it can't be applied always. So I would just always tell the CEO, be considerate about your future and motivation of your co-founders.

And if you're not really interested in the future motivation of your co-founders, if you don't think you're gonna need them in the long term, why are you making them co-founders at all? You should really reconsider who's on your team if you don't think they're worth a generous equity grant.

Thank you very much for your time.

More Articles

View All
The Reason I’m $1.8 Million In Debt
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, I really feel like this is something worth addressing given just how much misinformation there’s been surrounding a few of the recent videos that I made. Two of which really stand out the most. The first one is wh…
Paul Graham: What does it mean to do things that don't scale?
What doing things that don’t scale means specifically is doing things in a sort of handmade, artisanal, painstaking way that you feel like, yeah, it would be great if you could do things that way forever. But you, in the back of your mind, think to yourse…
Warren Buffett: How to Stop Losing Money When Investing
The first role in investment is don’t lose, and the second rule of investment is don’t forget the first rule. And that’s all the rules there are. I mean that if you buy things for far below what they’re worth, and you buy a group of them, you basically do…
Applying volume of solids | Solid geometry | High school geometry | Khan Academy
We’re told that a cone-shaped grain hopper, and they put the highlight hopper in blue here in case you want to know its definition on the exercise. It’s something that would store grain, and then it can kind of fall out of the bottom. It has a radius of …
What are affixes? | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! Today we’re going to talk about things called affixes. One of the things that I love about the English language is how flexible its words can be. You can take little word parts and stick them together to make new words. If I read something…
What Does Colonizing Mars Look Like? | MARS
What will life be like in a early Mars colony? ROGER LAUNIUS: Let’s take some stages in terms of how we might do things on Mars. There is exploration, somebody going out and coming back. The next stage would be some sort of research station. We will most…