yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How a fly flies - Michael Dickinson


11m read
·Nov 8, 2024

[Music] [Applause]

I grew up watching Star Trek. I love Star Trek. Star Trek wanted me. It made me want to see alien creatures, creatures from a far distant world. But basically, I figured out that I could find those alien creatures right on Earth, and what I do is I study insects. I'm obsessed with insects, particularly insect flight. I think the evolution of insect flight is perhaps one of the most important events in the history of life. Without insects, there'd be no flowering plants; without flowering plants, there would be no clever, fruit-eating primates giving TED Talks.

Now, um, David and Hio and Kataki gave a very compelling story about the similarities between fruit flies and humans, and there are many similarities. So, you might think that if humans are similar to fruit flies, the favorite behavior of a fruit fly might be this, for example. But in my talk, I don't want to emphasize the similarities between humans and fruit flies but rather the differences and focus on the behaviors that I think fruit flies excel at doing.

So, I want to show you a high-speed video sequence of a fly shot at 7,000 frames per second in infrared lighting. To the right off screen is an electronic looming predator that is going to go at the fly. The fly is going to sense this predator, it is going to extend its legs out, and it’s going to sashay away to live to fly another day. Now, I have carefully cropped this sequence to be exactly the duration of a human eye blink. So, in the time that it would take you to blink your eye, the fly has seen this looming predator, estimated its position, and initiated a motor pattern to fly it away, beating its wings at 220 times a second as it does so.

I think this is a fascinating behavior that shows how fast the fly's brain can process information. Now, what does it take to fly? Well, in order to fly, just as in a human aircraft, you need wings that can generate sufficient aerodynamic forces. You need an engine sufficient to generate the power required for flight, and you need a controller. In the first human aircraft, the controller was basically the brain of Orville and Wilbur, sitting in the cockpit.

Now, how does this compare to a fly? Well, I spent a lot of my early career trying to figure out how insect wings generate enough force to keep the flies in the air. You might have heard how engineers proved that bumblebees couldn't fly. Well, the problem was in thinking that the insect wings function the way that aircraft wings work, but they don't. We tackled this problem by building giant, dynamically scaled model robot insects that would flap in giant pools of mineral oil, where we could study the aerodynamic forces.

It turns out that the insects flap their wings in a very clever way, at a very high angle of attack that creates a structure at the leading edge of the wing—a little tornado-like structure called a leading edge vortex. It's that vortex that actually enables the wings to make enough force for the animal to stay in the air.

But the thing that's actually most fascinating is not so much that the wing has some interesting morphology; what's clever is the way the fly flaps it, which of course ultimately is controlled by the nervous system, and this is what enables flies to perform these remarkable aerial maneuvers.

Now, what about the engine? The engine of the fly is absolutely fascinating. They have two types of flight muscle: so-called power muscle, which is stretch-activated, meaning that it activates itself and does not need to be controlled on a contraction-by-contraction basis by the nervous system. It is specialized to generate the enormous power required for flight, and it fills the middle portion of the fly. So, when a fly hits your windshield, it's basically the power muscle that you're looking at.

But attached to the base of the wing is a set of little tiny control muscles that are not very powerful at all, but they are very fast. They are able to reconfigure the hinge of the wing on a stroke-by-stroke basis, and this is what enables the fly to change its wing and generate the changes in aerodynamic forces, which change its flight trajectory. Of course, the role of the nervous system is to control all this.

So, let's look at the controller. Now, flies excel in the sorts of sensors that they carry to this problem. They have antennae that sense odors and detect wind detection. They have a sophisticated eye, which is the fastest visual system on the planet. They have another set of eyes on the top of their head; we have no idea what they do. They have sensors on their wings— their wings are covered with sensors, including sensors that sense deformation of the wing. They can even taste with their wings.

One of the most sophisticated sensors a fly has is a structure called the Halteres. The Halteres are actually gyroscopes. These devices beat back and forth about 200 Hertz during flight, and the animal can use them to sense its body rotation and initiate very, very fast corrective maneuvers. All the sensory information has to be processed by a brain, and yes, indeed, flies have a brain—a brain of about 100,000 neurons.

Now, several people at this conference have already suggested that fruit flies could serve in neuroscience because they are a simple model of brain function. The basic punchline of my talk is, I'd like to turn that over on its head. I don't think they’re a simple model of anything, and I think that flies are a great model. They're a great model for flies. And let's explore, let's explore this notion of simplicity.

So, I think, unfortunately, a lot of neuroscientists are somewhat narcissistic when we think of the brain. We, of course, imagine our own brain. But remember that this kind of brain, which is much, much smaller— instead of 100 billion neurons, it has 100,000 neurons. But this is the most common form of brain on the planet and has been for 400 million years. Is it fair to say that it's simple? Well, it's simple in the sense that it has fewer neurons, but is that a fair metric? I would propose it’s not a fair metric.

So, let's sort of think about this. I think we have to compare the size of the brain with what the brain can do. So, I propose we have a "Trump number." The Trump number is the ratio of this man's behavioral repertoire to the number of neurons in his brain. We'll calculate the Trump number for the fruit fly.

Now, how many people here think the Trump number is higher for the fruit fly? It's a very smart audience. Yes, the inequality goes in this direction. Or I would posit it. Now, I realize that it is a little bit absurd to compare the behavioral repertoire of a human to a fly, but let's take another animal just as an example. Here's a mouse. A mouse has about a thousand times as many neurons as a fly.

I used to study mice. When I studied mice, I used to talk really slowly, and then something happened when I started to work on flies. I think if you compare the natural history of flies and mice, it's really comparable. They have to forage for food, they have to engage in courtship, they have sex, they hide from predators. They do a lot of similar things, but I would argue that flies do more.

So, for example, I'm going to show you a sequence, and I have to say some of my funding comes from the military, so I'm showing this classified sequence, and you cannot discuss it outside of this room. Okay? So, I want you to look at the payload at the tail of the fruit fly. Watch it very closely, and you'll see why my six-year-old son now wants to be a neuroscientist— wait for it.

So, at least you'll admit that if fruit flies are not as clever as mice, they're at least as clever as pigeons. Now, I want to get across that it's not just a matter of numbers but also the challenge for a fly to compute everything that brain has to compute with such tiny neurons.

So, this is a beautiful image of a visual interneuron from a mouse that came from Jeff Liman's lab, and you could see the wonderful images of brains that he showed in his talk. But up in the corner, in the right corner, you'll see at the same scale a visual neuron from a fly. I'll expand this up. It's a beautiful, complex neuron; it's just very, very tiny, and there's lots of biophysical challenges with trying to compute information with tiny, tiny neurons.

How small can neurons get? Well, look at this interesting insect. It looks sort of like a fly; it has wings, it has eyes, it has antenna, it has legs, complicated life history. It’s a parasite; it has to fly around and find caterpillars to parasitize. But not only is its brain the size of a salt grain, which is comparable for a fruit fly, it is the size of a salt grain— a salt!

So, here's some other organisms at a similar scale. This animal is the size of a paramecium and an amoeba, and it has a brain of 7,000 neurons. That's so small! You know these things called cell bodies you've been hearing about, where the nucleus of the neuron is? This animal gets rid of them because they take up too much space.

So, this is a session on frontiers in neuroscience. I would posit that one frontier in neuroscience is to figure out how the brain of that thing works. But let's think about this. How can you make a small number of neurons do a lot?

I think if, from an engineering perspective, you think of multiplexing, you can take hardware and have that hardware do different things at different times or have different parts of the hardware doing different things. These are the two concepts I'd like to explore, and they're not concepts that I've come up with but concepts that have been proposed by others in the past.

One idea comes from lessons from chewing crabs, and I don't mean chewing the crabs. I grew up in Baltimore, and I chew crabs very, very well, but I'm talking about the crabs actually doing the chewing. Crab chewing is actually really fascinating. Crabs have this complicated structure under their carapace called the gastric mill that grinds their food in a variety of different ways.

Here's an endoscopic movie of this structure. The amazing thing about this is that it's controlled by a really tiny set of neurons—about two dozen neurons—that can produce a vast variety of different motor patterns. The reason it can do this is that this little tiny ganglion in the crab is actually inundated by many neuromodulators. You heard about neuromodulators earlier; there are more neuromodulators that alter this structure than actually neurons in the structure, and they're able to generate a complicated set of patterns.

This is the work by Eve Marder and her many colleagues who've been studying this fascinating system that shows how a small cluster of neurons can do many, many things because of neuromodulation that can take place on a moment-by-moment basis. So, this is basically multiplexing in time.

Imagine a network of neurons with one neuromodulator. You select one set of cells to perform one sort of behavior, another neuromodulator for another set of cells, and a different pattern, and you can imagine you could extrapolate to a very, very complicated system. Is there any evidence that flies do this?

Well, for many years in my laboratory and other laboratories around the world, we've been studying fly behaviors in little flight simulators. You can tether a fly to a little stick; you can measure the aerodynamic forces it's creating. You can let the fly play a little video game by letting it fly around in a visual display.

So, let me show you a little tiny sequence of this. Here’s a fly and a large infrared view of the fly in the flight simulator. This is a game the flies love to play: you allow them to steer towards a little stripe, and they’ll just steer towards that stripe forever. It’s part of their visual guidance system.

But very recently, it's been possible to modify these sorts of behavioral arenas for physiology. This is the preparation that one of my former postdocs, Gabby Mayon, who is now at Rockefeller, developed. It’s basically a flight simulator, but under conditions where you can actually stick an electrode in the brain of the fly and record from a genetically identified neuron in the fly’s brain.

This is what one of these experiments looks like. It was a sequence taken from another postdoc in the lab, Patina. Now, the green trace at the bottom is the membrane potential of a neuron in the fly's brain. You'll see the fly start to fly, and the fly is actually controlling the rotation of that visual pattern itself by its own wing motion. You can see this visual interneuron respond to the pattern of wing motion as the fly flies.

So, for the first time, we've actually been able to record from neurons in the fly's brain while the fly is performing sophisticated behaviors such as flight and walking and so forth. And one of the lessons we've been learning is that the physiology of cells that we've been studying for many years in quiescent flies is not the same as the physiology of those cells when the fly is actually engaged in active behaviors.

And why is the physiology different? Well, it turns out it’s these neuromodulators, just like the neuromodulators in that little tiny ganglion in the crab. So, here’s a picture of the octopamine system. Octopamine is a neuromodulator that seems to play an important role in flight and other behaviors, but this is just one of many neuromodulators that's in the fly's brain.

So, I really think that as we learn more, it’s going to turn out that the whole fly brain is just like a large version of the stomatogastric ganglion, and that’s one of the reasons why it can do so much with so few neurons.

Now, another idea, another way of multiplexing, is multiplexing in space, having different parts of a neuron do different things at the same time. So, here’s two sort of canonical neurons from a vertebrate and an invertebrate: a human pyramidal neuron from Ramón y Cajal and another cell to the right, a non-spiking interneuron. This is the work of Alan Watson and Malcolm Burrows many years ago.

Malcolm Burrows came up with a pretty interesting idea based on the fact that this neuron from a locust does not fire action potentials. It’s a non-spiking cell. A typical neuron, like the neurons in our brain, has a region called the dendrites that receives input. That input sums together and will produce action potentials that run down the axon and then activate all the output regions of the neuron.

But non-spiking neurons are actually quite complicated because they can have input synapses and output synapses all interdigitated, and there's no single action potential that drives all the outputs at the same time. So, there’s a possibility that you have computational compartments that allow different parts of the neuron to do different things at the same time.

So, these basic concepts of multitasking in time and multitasking in space—I think these are things that are true in our brains as well, but I think the insects are the true masters of this. So, I hope you think of insects a little bit differently next time. And as I say up here, please think before you [Applause] [Music] swat.

More Articles

View All
The Journey of Self Discovery: Uncovering Your True Identity
Every day you cross paths with countless strangers. People sit next to you on the bus; you’re a cashier at the grocery store, sends you a smile, and someone works out beside you at the gym. Often, these faces pass us by; there’s nothing particularly disti…
Capitalism 2.0 Will Include a Healthy Dose of Socialism | Eric Weinstein | Big Think
I get asked a lot about the state of capitalism, and I think that for those members of society of a certain age, we think of capitalism as being locked in an ideological battle with socialism, perhaps, or even communism. But we never really saw that capit…
Want to Make Better Decisions? Know the Difference between Engineering and Design Thinking
There are lots of ways to think. And what you want is you want a toolkit of ways to think, and you want ways to think to be aligned with the problems you’re thinking about. So we talk about sort of four examples of ways of thinking. There’s engineering t…
Lithium 101 | National Geographic
(clanging) [Narrator] Over the course of human history, fuel for industry has come in many forms. But one of the major drivers of development in the current technological age is a highly volatile element that makes up only 0.002% of the Earth’s crust. Su…
Creativity break: how have you used creative communication to solve a problem? | Khan Academy
[Music] I’ve used creative communication to solve problems related to especially people learning different science. For example, in chemistry, people sometimes have a hard time understanding subatomic particles and molecules and atoms, and making those co…
The best AI founders in the world are moving here
Why was San Francisco so definitively the center of the tech industry? Why did it all like agglomerate here? San Francisco is the place in the world where you can manufacture luck. Within a month of us moving in, they launched Twitter. I was like, “Wow, t…