yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Neil deGrasse Tyson Demystifies Breakthroughs | Breakthrough


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

There's a stereotype of discoveries and breakthroughs. The stereotype is: at one point you don't know something, and then there's a Eureka moment, and then you know something, and that's a breakthrough. The very word itself implies some barrier through which you pass with some force. Okay? Otherwise, it would be walk-through instead of breakthrough.

But I would claim that most discoveries are walk-throughs, not breakthroughs. You're not actually breaking things. You say, "Oh, you got that? You got that? Let me put it together, and I have a new thing." Oh, that's cool! Did you break through anything? No, no. It was like a next thing you would do with the other things that exist on your table right now.

We do occasionally have literal breakthroughs, yes, but most of what we experience in life and enjoy in life as the product of science and technology are not breakthroughs. They're just not the discoveries that came next after other discoveries enabled it. You can focus on those things that broke through, but that feeds the bias that that's how we move forward in the world.

Was it a breakthrough that someone decided to print books small so that you can carry them with you instead of only having to be in a library? Make the jackets out of paper instead of boards so that they're light? Was that a breakthrough? Just say, "That's kind of a fun idea." You know, that's a really trivial example, but it's the kind of example I'm talking about.

So much of what we take for granted, somebody actually had to think up first but didn't have to break through a damn thing to get there. Not everyone's brain is wired to think up these new applications of what is already there or to invent a new thing that does not previously exist. That's a very special subset of who walks among us as human beings, and we need them. Otherwise, we stall.

We stagnate. If a nation does not have such people, then the nation has to follow everybody else who does, and they dance to the tune played by other nations who do invest in that way. What I find fun are products that get invented, and you wonder, "No one will ever need or want to use that," and then five years later, somebody finds a use, and then you can't live without it.

More Articles

View All
Negative frequency
I want to talk a little bit about one of the quirkier ideas in signal processing, and that’s the idea of negative frequency. This is a phrase that may not initially make any sense at all. What does it mean to be a negative frequency? Could there be a sine…
Negative definite integrals | Integration and accumulation of change | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
We’ve already thought about what a definite integral means. If I’m taking the definite integral from ( a ) to ( b ) of ( f(x) \, dx ), I can just view that as the area below my function ( f ). So, if this is my y-axis, this is my x-axis, and ( y ) is equ…
Starbucks predatory practices, and 'the will of the people'
Lawton, you made a video about the predatory business practices of Starbucks and asked how this will be dealt with in a free market or how we dealt with in the absence of government regulation. Specifically, I think that in a free market, some businesses…
The Arctic Story Hunter | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
Conjure an image of the Russian tundra, Siberia, as far north as you can go before you hit the Arctic Ocean. Your image probably looks like a snowy whiteout. You might picture stark, forbidding ice scapes devoid of color and life. But through the lens of …
THE DOWNFALL OF CREDIT CARDS | HOW TO PREPARE
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So as I’m sure many of you know by now, I am a huge proponent and believer in credit cards. I think they’re a great way to leverage your money, get purchase protection, get cash back, collect points, travel for free, …
Worked example: rational vs. irrational expressions (unknowns) | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told let A and B be rational numbers and let B be non-zero. They had to say let B be non-zero because we’re about to divide by B. Is A over B rational or irrational? Well, let’s think about it. They’re both rational numbers, so that means that A, s…