yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Neil deGrasse Tyson Demystifies Breakthroughs | Breakthrough


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

There's a stereotype of discoveries and breakthroughs. The stereotype is: at one point you don't know something, and then there's a Eureka moment, and then you know something, and that's a breakthrough. The very word itself implies some barrier through which you pass with some force. Okay? Otherwise, it would be walk-through instead of breakthrough.

But I would claim that most discoveries are walk-throughs, not breakthroughs. You're not actually breaking things. You say, "Oh, you got that? You got that? Let me put it together, and I have a new thing." Oh, that's cool! Did you break through anything? No, no. It was like a next thing you would do with the other things that exist on your table right now.

We do occasionally have literal breakthroughs, yes, but most of what we experience in life and enjoy in life as the product of science and technology are not breakthroughs. They're just not the discoveries that came next after other discoveries enabled it. You can focus on those things that broke through, but that feeds the bias that that's how we move forward in the world.

Was it a breakthrough that someone decided to print books small so that you can carry them with you instead of only having to be in a library? Make the jackets out of paper instead of boards so that they're light? Was that a breakthrough? Just say, "That's kind of a fun idea." You know, that's a really trivial example, but it's the kind of example I'm talking about.

So much of what we take for granted, somebody actually had to think up first but didn't have to break through a damn thing to get there. Not everyone's brain is wired to think up these new applications of what is already there or to invent a new thing that does not previously exist. That's a very special subset of who walks among us as human beings, and we need them. Otherwise, we stall.

We stagnate. If a nation does not have such people, then the nation has to follow everybody else who does, and they dance to the tune played by other nations who do invest in that way. What I find fun are products that get invented, and you wonder, "No one will ever need or want to use that," and then five years later, somebody finds a use, and then you can't live without it.

More Articles

View All
Missing numbers in three digit subtraction
Let’s say that we are told that 495 is equal to 621 minus blank. What would blank be? Pause this video and see if you can figure that out. Okay, now let’s do this together. One technique is to try to visualize this on a number line. 495 is what you get w…
Unlocking the Eyes | Explorer
[Music] What boggles my mind about the eye is everything. But I’m really, really excited by the advances in technology made possible by research, not just into the eye, but into how natural selection caused it to be what it is. The next few decades are go…
See Why Jumping in a Pool Saved This Blind Woman's Life | Short Film Showcase
My first time in the pool, I was 49 years old. My coach was in the water telling me, “Jump in, Vivian,” he said. “Haven’t you been baptized?” I said, “Not like this.” I was afraid of what was going to happen to me in all this water. The kids said, “Look a…
My Meditation Regimen
And usually, do you have a 20 minutes a day, twice a day? What is your regimen? Yeah, I try to do it twice a day for 20 minutes each time. Usually before breakfast and before dinner. Um, but I’m not perfect. You know, I would say probably a third of the …
Expedition Amazon – The Trek to Ausangate | National Geographic
[♪ dramatic music playing] [Thomas Peschak] At least you got some horses, eh? [Narrator] 30 horses and llamas, 60 bags of gear, 1,500 pounds of food, and 15 guides and porters. [Spanish] All needed to install a weather station 20,000 feet above sea lev…
Finding derivative with fundamental theorem of calculus: chain rule | AP®︎ Calculus | Khan Academy
Let’s say that we have the function capital F of x, which we’re going to define as the definite integral from 1 to sine of x. So that’s an interesting upper bound right over there of 2t minus 1, and of course dt. What we are curious about is trying to fi…