yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Factoring using polynomial division: missing term | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We're told the polynomial ( p(x) ) which is equal to this has a known factor of ( x + 6 ). Rewrite ( p(x) ) as a product of linear factors. Pause this video and see if you can have a go at that.

All right, now let's work on this together. Because they give us one of the factors, what we can do is say, "Hey, what happens if I divide ( x + 6 ) into ( p(x) )? What do I have left over?" It looks like I'm still going to have a quadratic, and then I'll probably have to factor that somehow to get a product of linear factors. So let's get going.

If I were to try to figure out what ( x + 6 ) divided into ( x^3 + 9x^2 ), and now we're going to have to be careful. You might be tempted to just write -108 there, but then this gets tricky because you have your third-degree column, your second-degree column, you need your first-degree column, but you just put your zero-degree, your constant column here.

So to make sure we have good hygiene, we could write ( + 0x ), and I encourage you to actually always do this if you're writing out a polynomial so that you don't skip that place, so to speak, -108.

And so then you say, "All right, let's look at the highest degree terms." ( x ) goes into ( x^3 ) ( x^2 ) times. ( x^2 ) times ( 6 ) is ( 6x^2 ). ( x^2 ) times ( x ) is ( x^3 ). We want to subtract. We've done this multiple times, so I'm going a little bit faster than normal. Those cancel out.

( 9x^2 - 6x^2 = 3x^2 ). Bring down that ( 0x ). And then how many times does ( x ) go into ( 3x^2 )? Well, it goes ( 3x ) times, and we would write it in this column. Notice if we didn't keep this column for our first-degree terms, we'd be kind of confused where to write that ( 3x ) right about now.

And so ( 3x ) times ( 6 ), I should say, is ( 18x ). ( 3x ) times ( x ) is ( 3x^2 ). We want to subtract what we have in that, I guess that color is move light purple, not sure. And so we get ( 3x^2 )'s cancel out, and then ( 0x - 18x = -18x ). Bring down that ( -108 ).

And so then we have ( x ) goes into ( -18x ) ( -18 ) times. ( -18 ) times ( 6 ) is ( -108 ). That's working out nicely. ( -18 ) times ( x ) is ( -18x ), and then we want to subtract what we have in this not so pleasant brown color.

And so I will multiply them both by negative, and so I am left with zero; everything just cancels out. And so I can rewrite ( p(x) ). I can rewrite ( p(x) ) as being equal to ( x + 6 \times (x^2 + 3x - 18) ).

But I'm not done yet because this is not a linear factor; this is still quadratic. So let's see, can I think of two numbers that add up to ( 3 ) and then when I multiply I get ( -18 )? So they'll need different signs, and then the obvious one is positive ( 6 ) and negative ( 3 ).

And if that what I just did seems like voodoo to you, I encourage you to review factoring polynomials. But this I can rewrite because negative ( 6 + ) or actually I should say positive ( 6 + (-3) ) is equal to ( 3 ), and then positive ( 6 \times negative ( 3 ) is equal to ( -18 ).

So I can rewrite this as ( x + 6 \times (x + 6) \times (x - 3) ). And so there we have it; we have a product of linear factors, and we are done.

More Articles

View All
Homeroom with Sal & Kristen DiCerbo
Okay standby. I realize I didn’t put the links to both of these. Hi everyone, welcome to our daily homeroom live stream! Sal here from Khan Academy. For those of you who are wondering what this is, this is our way of staying in touch. We started doing th…
On having expectations
Uh, I try not to have expectations of what I’m doing next or where things are going to go because then you close yourself off to the opportunities that the universe is constantly dropping all around you. It’s just, you have to go pick them up, and you ha…
2015 AP Calculus BC 5b | AP Calculus BC solved exams | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Let k equal four so that f of x is equal to one over x squared minus four x. Determine whether f has a relative minimum, a relative maximum, or neither at x equals two. Justify your answer. All right, well, if f of x is equal to this, then f prime of x. …
Critically looking at data on ROC and economic growth over millenia | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
So we’ve already talked about the general idea: the thesis that if the return on capital is greater than the growth of an economy, that could lead to inequality. Although we showed a case where, depending on the circumstances with the right numbers, that’…
Dave Bautista Makes a Log Ladder | Running Wild With Bear Grylls
[music playing] So the terrain here is definitely getting steeper and more committing. But you know, so much of survival is about just trying to be resourceful. I just wonder if maybe we maybe use that old trunk. Use that, get that down, and then we can d…
Kevin O'Leary REVEALS His MULTI-MILLION Dollar Watch COLLECTION!
Hi there! As always, this week’s episode of Ask Mr. Wonderful comes from questions. It’s a dialogue; it’s a two-way thing. What I’m trying to do is gather a lot of questions into areas where it’s the same question over and over again, so I’m answering as …