yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Meta's Creepy AI Celebrities


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

What if you were able to have your loved ones live on with you long after they're gone, to hear their voice, experience their laugh, get their advice, and tell inside jokes that only the two of you know? If someone told you they could make that happen, would you take them up on that offer?

In 2017, John Mayer, the CEO of artificial intelligence company Forever Voices, did just that. He developed the bot version of his father who recently passed away. He could chat with his dad whenever he wanted, engage with him, and for a moment, escape the pain of him being gone. Since then, the AI market for bots based on real people, influencers, or celebrities has exploded. Companies have been built and rebuilt to capitalize on the AI craze, but none has more potential for influence than this one: Meta.

So when Meta introduced its new AI features, tech reporters and regular users alike leaned in. Meta's new features include customized stickers, IM editing, and an AI assistant. One development in particular that's thrown everyone for a loop is a new cast of AI bots. These bots aren't your run-of-the-mill AI bots, though; each one of them has a unique backstory and expertise in a particular niche. They have profiles on Instagram and Facebook, and most importantly, they're voiced by cultural icons and influencers like Tom Brady, Naomi Osaka, Kendall Jenner, Mr. Beast, and Paris Hilton.

But confusingly, the characters are different from their instantly recognizable celebrity voices. You're not chatting sports with Tom Brady, but rather a guy named Brew, who just so happens to look and sound exactly like Tom Brady. You can talk Dungeons and Dragons with the Dragon Master voiced by Snoop Dogg or look for advice from Kendall Jenner AI, your no BS ride or die companion. Some of these characters, like Jenner, make sense, while others leave you wondering what the connection is. For example, Paris Hilton is a crime-solving detective. What's the connection there?

Ironically, these bots were unveiled at Meta's annual product showcase, Connect, at the same time the actor's union, the Screen Actor Guild, was on strike harshly over demands around limiting AI-generated content that threatens to put actors out of work. So how did Meta get a bunch of non-actor celebrities to give away their likeness? Well, they didn't give it away at all. They were reportedly paid up to 5 million each for 6 hours of work and endless usage of their face and voice. Meta's deep pockets and cutting-edge AI technology called Llama positioned the company perfectly to take on such a high-profile AI project.

Unfortunately, a lot of the new bots are generally regarded as creepy and confusing. Chatting with AI Tom Brady or Brew might be a fun novelty at first, but quickly can evolve into a far less interesting conversation about football than one might expect with the actual Tom Brady. Novelty, it turns out, wears off pretty quickly.

So why is Meta taking such a big chance on this new Chad bot program that seems doomed to fail from day one? Well, just like many others, it's trying to win the artificial intelligence market. There's never been a more exciting time and competitive time for AI, and Meta is trying to do things a little differently than its main competitors like OpenAI. Llama, its homegrown tech, is open source, which means Meta is giving developers around the globe access to its software. This is in stark comparison to the technology behind ChatGPT, which OpenAI keeps under wraps.

Meta compares this strategy with Linux, an open-source PC alternative to Windows in the '90s and 2000s. Linux made its way into corporate servers worldwide and became a key component of the modern market. Meta is hoping that Llama will have the same effect in their eyes, by making the technology open source and allowing third parties to make improvements. This could result in better efficiency and ultimately make it cheaper for Meta to run the AI software.

And what better way to keep its software relevant than creating a pop culture moment using Snoop Dogg or Paris Hilton AI bots? Ultimately, the idea isn't that original; it's the same concept used by another company called Replica.

More Articles

View All
Node voltage method (step 5) | Circuit analysis | Electrical engineering | Khan Academy
And now we’re down to solving this circuit. What I want to do now is put in the component values and solve this specific circuit. Let me move the screen up again. We’ll leave the list of steps up there so we can see them. Let’s go to work on this equation…
Help support Khan Academy
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy, and I just wanted to remind you that we are a not-for-profit, and we can only exist through donations from folks like yourself. Our goal is for everyone to reach their potential. Potential is everywhere; unfo…
Distance and displacement introduction | One-dimensional motion | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
So let’s say we have a sheep and it is hungry. So that is my sheep, my best quick drawing of a sheep. It is just following the grass wherever it finds good grass to eat. In pursuit of tasty grass, it first goes 10 kilometers to the east, 10 kilometers ea…
What was the Articles of Confederation? | US Government and Civics | Khan Academy
So John, people are always talking about the Constitution, but the Constitution was not the first founding document of the United States. What were the Articles of Confederation, and why did they need to get replaced? Well, the Articles of Confederation w…
Michael Seibel: How do you decide what to build next?
So the question is basically how do we figure out what to build next? Here’s my answer: the reason why you have a part development cycle is that you can work on multiple things. Usually, there isn’t a right answer. Usually, all of the things that you want…
Worked example: Merging definite integrals over adjacent intervals | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
What we have here is a graph of y is equal to f of x, and these numbers are the areas of these shaded regions. These regions are between our curve and the x-axis. What we’re going to do in this video is do some examples of evaluating definite integrals us…