yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Meta's Creepy AI Celebrities


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

What if you were able to have your loved ones live on with you long after they're gone, to hear their voice, experience their laugh, get their advice, and tell inside jokes that only the two of you know? If someone told you they could make that happen, would you take them up on that offer?

In 2017, John Mayer, the CEO of artificial intelligence company Forever Voices, did just that. He developed the bot version of his father who recently passed away. He could chat with his dad whenever he wanted, engage with him, and for a moment, escape the pain of him being gone. Since then, the AI market for bots based on real people, influencers, or celebrities has exploded. Companies have been built and rebuilt to capitalize on the AI craze, but none has more potential for influence than this one: Meta.

So when Meta introduced its new AI features, tech reporters and regular users alike leaned in. Meta's new features include customized stickers, IM editing, and an AI assistant. One development in particular that's thrown everyone for a loop is a new cast of AI bots. These bots aren't your run-of-the-mill AI bots, though; each one of them has a unique backstory and expertise in a particular niche. They have profiles on Instagram and Facebook, and most importantly, they're voiced by cultural icons and influencers like Tom Brady, Naomi Osaka, Kendall Jenner, Mr. Beast, and Paris Hilton.

But confusingly, the characters are different from their instantly recognizable celebrity voices. You're not chatting sports with Tom Brady, but rather a guy named Brew, who just so happens to look and sound exactly like Tom Brady. You can talk Dungeons and Dragons with the Dragon Master voiced by Snoop Dogg or look for advice from Kendall Jenner AI, your no BS ride or die companion. Some of these characters, like Jenner, make sense, while others leave you wondering what the connection is. For example, Paris Hilton is a crime-solving detective. What's the connection there?

Ironically, these bots were unveiled at Meta's annual product showcase, Connect, at the same time the actor's union, the Screen Actor Guild, was on strike harshly over demands around limiting AI-generated content that threatens to put actors out of work. So how did Meta get a bunch of non-actor celebrities to give away their likeness? Well, they didn't give it away at all. They were reportedly paid up to 5 million each for 6 hours of work and endless usage of their face and voice. Meta's deep pockets and cutting-edge AI technology called Llama positioned the company perfectly to take on such a high-profile AI project.

Unfortunately, a lot of the new bots are generally regarded as creepy and confusing. Chatting with AI Tom Brady or Brew might be a fun novelty at first, but quickly can evolve into a far less interesting conversation about football than one might expect with the actual Tom Brady. Novelty, it turns out, wears off pretty quickly.

So why is Meta taking such a big chance on this new Chad bot program that seems doomed to fail from day one? Well, just like many others, it's trying to win the artificial intelligence market. There's never been a more exciting time and competitive time for AI, and Meta is trying to do things a little differently than its main competitors like OpenAI. Llama, its homegrown tech, is open source, which means Meta is giving developers around the globe access to its software. This is in stark comparison to the technology behind ChatGPT, which OpenAI keeps under wraps.

Meta compares this strategy with Linux, an open-source PC alternative to Windows in the '90s and 2000s. Linux made its way into corporate servers worldwide and became a key component of the modern market. Meta is hoping that Llama will have the same effect in their eyes, by making the technology open source and allowing third parties to make improvements. This could result in better efficiency and ultimately make it cheaper for Meta to run the AI software.

And what better way to keep its software relevant than creating a pop culture moment using Snoop Dogg or Paris Hilton AI bots? Ultimately, the idea isn't that original; it's the same concept used by another company called Replica.

More Articles

View All
When Big Oil Owns Your Soil | Parched
California is the third largest oil-producing state in the country. A lot of people don’t realize that. When they think of California, they think of vineyards and Hollywood. But we’ve been living with oil and gas production since the late 19th century. Ke…
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
All right, welcome back. A big shock from a big retailer, Tractor Supply, which actually is huge, got more than 2,200 stores all across America. Last night, coming out and saying they are cutting all of their diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. That…
Sharpening a Knife | Live Free or Die: How to Homestead
One thing that’s really important to me in the kitchen is to have all my knives really sharp. So I want to teach you how to sharpen your own knives in your own kitchen. The first step is to get a sharpening stone. One side with more rough grains, the opp…
Don’t Be “Distracted by Their Darkness” | Marcus Aurelius on Success
Even though the Stoic teachings are geared towards tranquility, the end goal is living virtuously and in accordance with nature. So, there’s something as being ‘successful’ as a Stoic, which is living a life of virtue. But no matter what we pursue, the wo…
One-sided limits from tables | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
The function ( f ) is defined over the real numbers. This table gives select values of ( f ). We have our table here; for any of these ( x ) values, it gives the corresponding ( f(x) ). What is a reasonable estimate for the limit of ( f(x) ) as ( x ) appr…
Gustaf Alstromer - How to Get Users and Grow
On company updates, please be honest. They’re for you and not for us. And if you make them clearly crazy, like you know we’re never ever launching, we’re launching in four million years, we’ll get the hint. So don’t do that. There have been a lot of ques…