yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett: How ANYONE Can Become Rich (5 Steps)
Omission is way bigger than commission. There’s big opportunities in life that have to be seized. Uh, we don’t do very many things, but when we get the chance to do something that’s right and big, we’ve got to do it. Even to do it on a small scale is just…
Bandit bakers and the social contract
A YouTube user made a two-part video in which he gave replies to claims that he associates with libertarianism. I was quickly asked to give a response. I’m busy working on the follow-up to George Ought to Help at the moment, so I’m gonna keep this brief a…
How to stop being unconfident
It’s no secret that we spend a lot of time and effort trying to appear confident on the surface when we’re around other people because we kind of have no choice. People are extremely judgmental, whether they’re aware of it or not. Sizing people up is an e…
Dividing a decimal by a whole number example
Let’s see if we can compute what 1.86 divided by 2 is. And like always, pause this video and have a go at it. I’ll give you a hint: see if you can think about 1.86 as a certain number of hundredths, and then divide that by 2. All right, now let’s work th…
Human migration: sub-Saharan Africa and the Pacific | World History | Khan Academy
In this video, I want to explore the question of what impact does the environment have on human migration. We have a couple of specific examples here, and before we dig into those, I want to make a few broader points about the environment as a historical …
Passive Income 2019: How I now earn $7930 per month passively
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, I think this video topic has become somewhat of an annual tradition because, on March 3rd, 2017, I posted a video explaining how I was making three thousand nine hundred and fifty dollars per month in passive inco…