yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Using context clues to figure out new words | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! You know that feeling when you’re reading and you see a word you’ve never seen before and you don’t really know how to figure out what it means? Well, that’s what we’re talking about today: strategies for figuring out new words through cont…
Adding 2-digit numbers without regrouping 1 | Addition and subtraction | 1st grade | Khan Academy
Try to pause the video and figure out what 71 plus 24 is. All right, now let’s do this together. So let’s think about what 71 actually means. Well, we have a one in the ones place. Let me make this clear. So this is the ones place and we have one one. So …
The Excavation of Tutankhamun’s Mummy | King Tut in Color
NARRATOR: At last, in October 19, 2005, after three years of excavating Tutankhamun’s tomb, Howard Carter and his team begin to open the king’s coffin. Lifting its lid exposes another shroud. When Carter carefully peels that back, he discovers a second gi…
Is Space Weather a Thing? | StarTalk
Another kind of weather more traditional way to think about whether is what the air is doing on planets that have atmospheres. And moons don’t have an atmosphere, so we don’t think about them. Whether Mars has an atmosphere, Jupiter has an atmosphere, Sa…
Why & How Capitalism Needs to Be Reformed
I see populism as people rising up to reject their leadership. Now, it’s a bad thing. Yes, that they’re not willing to accept the results. I agree with your definition. I agree with your definition. And then also at the same time that that’s happening, t…
Atomic Rant
[Applause] Now it’s time for me to get something off my chest. It’s been bugging me since I was a little kid, so you may as well be my first victims. Now, all of you out there know what an atom looks like right? It looks like this. So am I right? No, I’…