yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Voter turnout | Political participation | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to talk about in this video is voter turnout, which is a way of thinking about how many of the people who could vote actually do vote. It’s often expressed as a number, as a percentage, where you have the number who vote over the number o…
Born 4 Months Early, This Tiny Survivor Beats the Odds | Short Film Showcase
I just always had this image of this daughter that I would have someday: kind of a dirty-faced, tree-climbing little girl. 24 weeks is considered viability outside the womb. To support at 23 weeks and six days, three white, 16 for the girls. Yeah, yeah, …
Origins of the Dragon | StarTalk
How good could be unless it’s got dragons? It’s no fantasy unless you have a dragon. Yeah, you need the dragon. Yeah. You need the dragons. And in my home institution, the American Museum of Natural History, we had an exhibit a few years ago that was al…
Long run supply when industry costs are increasing or decreasing | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
What we have here we can view as the long run equilibrium or long run steady state for a perfectly competitive market. Let’s say this is the market for apples and it was this idealized perfectly competitive situation where we have many firms producing. Th…
Stock Market Trivia Night! (w/ @InvestWithQueenie)
You are live! We are live! Hello, everybody! If you can hear us, let us know. I’m joined by Queenie. How are you going, Queen? “Yeah, good! It’s so good to be here, and yeah, streaming live, it’s so much fun. I love live! Like, mystery in the air, like wh…
Measuring segments
What is BD? So, when they’re just saying BD, they’re saying literally the length of segment BD. So they’re saying the length from point B to point D. B is sitting here at negative two, D here is at five. So, you’re looking at really the distance between …