yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Is America Actually Metric?
I’m here at the National Institute for Standards and Technology, and I’m about to see some of the original kilogram standards. Patrick: You are, you are. When were these made? Well, the originals were made in the 1880s. There were 40 of them that were b…
6 STOIC LESSONS FROM SENECA FOR MASTERING MENTAL TOUGHNESS | STOICISM INSIGHTS
Every one of us at some point feels like life is spinning out of control, whether it’s a lost job, a broken relationship, or just the chaotic pace of daily routines. These moments can leave us feeling helpless and overwhelmed. But what if I told you there…
We're in DEFLATION for the first time in 22 years.
Well everybody, we are in deflation. This is the first time that Australia has been in deflation in literally 23 years. So check this out, this article reads consumer prices in Australia dropped by 0.3 percent year on year in Q2 2020. This was the first d…
Rewriting a quadratic function from vertex form to standard form | Khan Academy
So what I have right over here is the equation of a function in vertex form. What I want to do is rewrite it so it is in standard form. So pause this video and have a go at that before we do it together. All right, let’s just remind ourselves what standa…
Congruent shapes and transformations
We’re told Cassandra was curious if triangle ABC and triangle GFE were congruent, so he tried to map one figure onto the other using a rotation. So, let’s see. This is triangle ABC, and it looks like at first he rotates triangle ABC about point C to get i…
Why I Stopped Spending Money
What’s up guys? It’s Graham here. So, I think it’s no surprise that for anyone to see my channel for a while, I’m pretty frugal. To be honest, even calling it that could be generous. I’m, uh, extremely thrifty, or maybe we could just call it fiscally cons…