yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Homeroom with Sal & Lily Eskelsen García - Wednesday, August 12
Hi everyone, welcome to the Homeroom live stream. Sal here from Khan Academy. Super excited about the conversation we’re going to have today. But before we get started, I will give my standard announcements. First of all, a reminder that we are not for p…
Chasing Microbes: The Secret Superheroes of Our Planet | National Geographic
There are places all over the world where methane is coming out of the seafloor. This is kind of concerning because methane is a very strong greenhouse gas. We think a lot about carbon dioxide heating up the planet, but methane is about 25 times worse. An…
2021 YC Top Companies on Their Startup Journey
I’ll start with the introduction. “Why don’t you introduce yourself and your company?” “My name is Nikki Gulimas. I’m the co-founder and CEO of Nova Credit.” “My name is Olu Bengala. I’m the co-founder and CEO of Flora Weave.” “My name is Amir Nathu, …
Tom Friedman on saving lives and livelihoods & honoring the heroes of the crisis | Homeroom with Sal
Hi everyone! Welcome to the daily homeroom live stream. I’m Sal from Khan Academy, and I’m super excited about our guest today. So I’m actually just gonna go through my announcements pretty fast so that we have as much time with Tom Friedman as possible. …
Someone Dead Ruined My Life… Again.
Tada! It’s a video about Tiffany! I hope you like it. Psst. Hey, hey. Would you like to know more? Okay, great. So listen, I need to tell you about this poem. Come with me behind the scenes where I’ve been working on this for… I don’t even know how long. …
We Explain the Seen in Terms of the Unseen
Now people might object at this point and go, “How dare you invoke in science things that cannot be seen, things that cannot be observed? This is completely antagonistic towards the scientific method!” Surely, and I’ll say to anyone who’s thinking that r…