yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Dua Lipa: The 60 Minutes Interview
Plenty of teenagers want to become pop stars, but few convince their parents to let them pack their bags and move to another country to try and make it big. That’s what Dua Lipa did when she was just 15 years old. She’d taken some singing lessons but didn…
“The most useful piece of advice to get into real estate at 18?” - Calling Subscribers on Snapchat!
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So I’m testing out some new audio equipment, and I also figured this would be a good time to test out an idea I had. So basically, I get a ton of Snapchat messages and a ton of Instagram DMs, and I just can’t possibl…
It Started: The Reverse Housing Crash of 2023
What’s up, Graham? It’s Guys here. So, when it comes to the housing market, we have some good news and some bad news. Because in the last 30 days, despite ever-increasing mortgage rates and home prices falling by the largest amount since 2011, new forecas…
15 BEST Books on LEADERSHIP
You are watching the book club! Every Wednesday, we handpick the best books to improve your life. The 15 best books on leadership! Welcome to aLux.com, the place where future billionaires come to get inspired. If you’re not subscribed yet, you’re missing…
Addition using groups of 10 and 100 | 2nd grade | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] So, let’s do some practice problems on Khan Academy exercises that make us rewrite an addition problem so that we can get them to rounder numbers. Numbers that might be multiples of 10, or multiples of 100. So, let’s see here, I have 63 plus…
#shorts How Will Robots Affect These Jobs?
Robots don’t pay taxes or even spend money in the local communities. They should preserve their jobs. My question to you is, can they stop progress? Uh, first of all, there’s no evidence that that’s true. There have been lots of studies on automation in …