yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Introduction to the cell | Cells | High school biology | Khan Academy
You might already have some type of a notion of what a cell is. You might already realize that it is the most basic unit of life. Some would argue that maybe viruses are even a more basic unit of life. But the organisms that we consider living, like ourse…
15 Things You Didn't Know About PATEK PHILIPPE
15 things you didn’t know about Patek Philippe Philip, welcome to alux.com, the place where future billionaires come to get inspired. Welcome to the Alux channel, and thank you for joining us for another fascinating, fact-filled video. The Alux back cata…
Naming two isobutyl groups systematically | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy
In the last video, we named this molecule using the common names for this group right over here, and I thought it would be fun to also use to do the same thing, but use the systematic name. So, in the last video, we called this isobu, but if we wanted to …
Coral Bleaching in the Great Barrier Reef | Years of Living Dangerously
This year is the warmest on record, and with ocean temperatures reaching dangerously high levels, a major coral bleaching event is predicted to hit the Great Barrier Reef. It’s a race against time to document these reefs before climate change alters condi…
I Watch 3 Episodes of Mind Field With Our Experts & Researchers
(soft music) (eerie sound) Hey Vsauce! Michael here. Every episode of Mind Field is now free to view all over the world, all 24 episodes, all three seasons. Whoa! It is really exciting. And it’s why I’ve invited you here to Vsauce headquarters. Why watch…
Worked example: finding relative extrema | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we have G of X being equal to X to the fourth minus X to the fifth. What we want to do, without having to graph G, is figure out what X values G has a relative maximum. Just to remind us what’s going on in a relative maximum, let me draw a hypothetica…