yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Khan Academy India Talent Search 2016
Hi, I’m Sal Khan, founder of the Khan Academy, and I just want to let you know about our India Talent search. As you might know, Khan Academy is a not-for-profit with a mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. To us, that m…
The Tragedy of Freedom | Jean-Paul Sartre
What if we’d get a chance to start a new life? In his short novel Les Jeux Sont Faits, philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre plays with the idea of ‘starting all over’ in the same lifetime, despite the decisions we have made in the past. Even though we have free w…
This is what 65% of Millionaires ALL have in common...
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So I put something interesting the other day, and that was it: 65 percent of millionaires have three sources of income, 45 percent of millionaires have four sources of income, and 29 percent of millionaires have five …
Worked example: forming a slope field | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
In drawing the slope field for the differential equation, the derivative of y with respect to x is equal to y minus 2x. I would place short line segments at select points on the xy-plane. At the point (-1, 1), I would draw a short segment of slope blank.…
Generating inputs and outputs of a function
So we’re asked to pick any three pairs of corresponding input and output values of the following function and fill the table accordingly, and if necessary, round our answers to the nearest 0.1. Our function is defined as: if I input a t, what I’m going t…
How Much Is A Bird in The Hand Worth?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And as they say, “a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.” What it means is that it’s better to have a certain advantage than to have nothing, except the possibility of a greater one. But two birds in the bush? Who calcula…