yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
The Firefighting-inspired Watch #shorts #watch
I should disclose right now then, so we actually make the watches, Kevin, from genuine upcycled firefighting materials. Even elements of the case, which you can see by the striking strap that you have on your wrist. Yes, I should disclose right now that I…
Don’t Rely on Credibility Stamps
There are a lot of institutions in our society today that are relying upon credibility stamps. They used to be how you gain credibility in society. So, if you were a journalist writing for the New York Times or Washington Post, then you had the masthead o…
Pop Goes the Beetle | Primal Survivor
Dehydration is affecting my coordination. I should drink, but there’s a problem with my remaining water. This water in this bag has been here so long, and it’s been so hot; it just tastes so rancid. I’m thirsty, but it’s almost undrinkable. Drinking bad w…
Worked examples: Calculating [H₃O⁺] and pH | Acids and bases | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
[Instructor] Here are some equations that are often used in pH calculations. For example, let’s say a solution is formed at 25 degrees Celsius and the solution has a pOH of 4.75, and our goal is to calculate the concentration of hydronium ions in solution…
Reflexive pronouns | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello grammarians! Let’s talk about reflexive pronouns. And just as a word of warning, this means I’m going to be talking about myself a lot. What I mean is that in English, we have this distinction between the personal pronoun, um, so for example, me, an…
Alex Blumberg of Gimlet Media
Maybe the best place to start is which, seemingly, was the most common question. Mm-hmm. Rowe asked it, and a couple other people on Twitter: How do you source stories? That’s a really good question, and it’s one that we are sort of working to answer more…