yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Derivatives of sec(x) and csc(x) | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
In a previous video, we used the quotient rule in order to find the derivatives of tangent of X and cotangent of X. What I want to do in this video is to keep going and find the derivatives of secant of X and cosecant of X. So, let’s start with secant of …
Big Short Investor's Warning About Interest Rates in 2024
I think the expectation that the FED will cut rates three times from where I’m sitting is wrong. It’s just everybody’s coming to the year so bullish. If there are any disappointments, you know what’s going to hold the market up after two years of rate hik…
3 Stoic Ways To Be Happy
Many people these days are concerned with achieving a happy life but often lack the skills and knowledge to do so. Luckily, thousands of years ago, the old Stoics already figured out how to suffer less and enjoy more with a system of exercises, wisdom, an…
We Don’t Need to Seek Love. We Just Have to Stop Resisting It | The Wisdom of Rumi
The 13th-century Sufi mystic Jalāl ad-Dīn Muhammad Rūmī, also known as Mevlana or simply as Rumi, observed that all phenomena of nature are bound together by love. Love is what keeps planets orbiting their stars, stars encircling the centers of their gala…
Safari Live - Day 118 | National Geographic
Good afternoon and welcome to the sunset safari! Off to a great start already! We did in fact have a butterfly sitting on a piece of grass. It was a cabbage white, but of course it flew away just before we went live. Naturally, my name is Taylor McCurdy a…
Is the S&P 500 Just a Giant Bubble?
You know that saying in investment ads: past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. It’s an interesting one and it got me thinking, because for passive investors that are literally buying the whole market, the very thesis of that strat…