yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
The Perfect Storm | Rebuilding Paradise
The reality is that it was November 8th, and we hadn’t had any kind of significant rain. It had always rained before trick-or-treating, right? I mean, right? And now, and now we’re in these patterns here where we don’t see rain until, you know, into Novem…
It's Over: China’s ENTIRE Economy Is About To Collapse
Tens of thousands of them have begun withholding payments for unfinished projects. A massive protest over frozen bank deposits. The international community and the financial markets will also feel the pain. “What’s up, guys? It’s Graham here. So I recent…
Heat capacity at constant volume and pressure | Physics | Khan Academy
Imagine you had a monatomic ideal gas in the cylinder here, and there was this tightly fitted piston above it that prevented any gas from getting out. Well, we know that the total internal energy for a monatomic ideal gas is just three-halves P times V or…
TIL: Hummingbirds Are the World's Hungriest Birds | Today I Learned
If you were to use energy as quickly as a hummingbird, you’d have to eat a fridge full of food or about 300 hamburgers every day in order to survive. They use energy so quickly as they fly, so, so fast. A lot of the flowers they feed on are really delicat…
A Pitbull Becomes a Service Dog | Cesar Millan: Better Human Better Dog
For the past five years, Johns faced a brain tumor in the fight of his life. His weakened state has caused Goliath to become fixated on protecting him. Today, Goliath faces Caesar’s final challenge, which will determine if he’s balanced enough to be of se…
HOW TO BUILD VALUE AS AN INVESTOR | Dennis Miller
She believed in getting paid to wait. She would never own anything that didn’t send a check to her each month or each quarter, and she would live off those distributions. But if it didn’t pay you money, she didn’t get it; she didn’t consider it an investm…