yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
How to Build a Startup Without Funding by Pieter Levels @dojobalicoworking3342@ Dojo Bali
(Clapping) I’ve done a lot of building startups and side projects in the last four years. They’re mostly bootstrapped, and bootstrapped means that you build a business without any funding. So you don’t go to San Francisco. You don’t get venture capital fr…
The Housing Market Just Went ABSURD
What’s up, guys? It’s Graham here! So, as I’m sure you’re all aware, the housing market is absolutely bonkers. It was just revealed that housing prices have hit yet another record all-time high, rising 17% year-over-year. Buyers are paying a million doll…
The Philosopher Who Urinated On People | DIOGENES
He ridicules people on the streets, disrespected authority, broke with all forms of etiquette, and didn’t care about personal hygiene. On top of that, he defecated, urinated, and even sexually gratified himself in public. When you think of philosophy, the…
Inflection points (algebraic) | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let G of x = 1⁄4 x^4 - 4x^3 + 24x^2. For what values of x does the graph of G have an inflection point or have a point of inflection? So, let’s just remind ourselves what a point of inflection is. A point of inflection is where we change our concavity, o…
Kevin O'Leary Gets Triggered
Refused to spend money on two things. Number one, I think everyone knows, is, uh, coffee. I think it’s absolutely ridiculous the markup of coffee at Starbucks and Coffee Bean and a lot of those places out there. So I just make it home for 20 cents. I lov…
Success IS NOT What you Think it Will Be
So you do not rule out goals because you think they are unattainable? That’s one of your principles? Yeah, so let me clarify that. Until you’re on the journey, you don’t know enough about it. So when you try to assess, can I be successful or not be succe…