yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
A school of hippos gives an aggressive warning sign | Primal Survivor: Extreme African Safari
(Exhales forcefully) But it’s not crocodiles I should have been watching out for. Instead, it’s one of the most temperamental animals out here. (Hippo snorting) Wow, there are a lot of eyes looking in my direction, a lot of ears pointed in my direction. T…
Your desires are not yours.
Most of our desires are picked up through society: what other people are doing, what my friends are doing, what my brother’s doing, what my classmates are doing, what my wife wants, etc. So we copy those desires, and then we make them part of ourselves, a…
What Could Trigger a Shark Attack? | Rogue Shark
Across the Whit Sundays, hundreds of baited cameras are deployed and listening stations fixed as scientists race to understand why these previously safe waters have turned deadly. As the footage comes in, one big clue emerges: the poor visibility. What w…
The pH scale | Acids and bases | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
For a sample of pure water at 25 degrees Celsius, the concentration of hydronium ion is equal to 1.0 times 10 to the negative seventh molar. Because the concentrations are often very small, it’s much more convenient to express the concentration of hydroni…
Watch One Family's Journey Through A Life-Changing Face Transplant | National Geographic
I love you. You just make sure you have to be dreams, okay? That’s ever. I love you. We’re just outside the door. You’re a great hand into the best. All right, okay? We invent the wrong McDonald’s house as a last week. Two years, there’s so many different…
Quantum Mechanics: The Uncertainty Within
When I was a kid, I loved science, but I felt as though there was no point in becoming a scientist. Everything was already invented; everything we needed to know had already been discovered. Great! I mean, we had equations to describe all kinds of things—…