yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
It Started: The Worst Market Collapse In 50 Years | Michael Burry
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here, and it’s official: the stock market makes absolutely no sense. Despite weak earnings, a recession that’s all but confirmed, and JP Morgan’s recent warning that the market could fall another 20%, prices have begun to do t…
Bare/bear, allowed/aloud, advice/advise, break/brake | Frequently confused words | Usage | Grammar
Hello Grim Marians, hello a man, hello uh! Today, we’re going to be talking about four sets of frequently confused words, and the one that I want to begin with is “advice” and “advise.” How do we keep these two words straight? Well, first of all, “advice…
The Entire History of Humanity In 10 Minutes
From sharing the Earth with many other human species merely as hunter-gatherers trying to brave the elements, to building rockets, creating the internet, and now with our eyes set on Mars, the history of humanity is one that is sealed with determination, …
Composing 3x3 matrices | Matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
So, we have two three by three matrices here: matrix A and matrix B. We could, of course, view each of them as a transformation in three-dimensional space. Now, what we’re going to think about in this video is the composition of A and B. So, you could th…
Understanding factor pairs
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about factors and factor pairs. Now when we talk about factors, these are really numbers that can be multiplied together to make some number. So for example, if I were to talk about factors of 6, I could multip…
Worked example: estimating e_ using Lagrange error bound | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Estimating e to the 1.45 using a Taylor polynomial about x equal 2, what is the least degree of the polynomial that assures an error smaller than 0.001? In general, if you see a situation like this where we’re talking about approximating a function with …