yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Quadratic systems: a line and a parabola | Equations | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
We’re told the parabola given by ( y = 3x^2 - 6x + 1 ) and the line given by ( y - x + 1 = 0 ) are graphed. So you can see the parabola here in red and we can see the line here in blue. The first thing they ask us is, one intersection point is clearly id…
INFLATION WARNING: The 2020 DEBT Bubble Explained
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here! So, I want to take some time to address a recurring comment and concern that’s been showing up a lot on my channel lately, and that would be: Is Carole Baskin guilty? And did she do it? To which I say, possibly. But I th…
Constitutional compromises: The Three-Fifths Compromise | US government and civics | Khan Academy
[Instructor] In the last video, we discussed one of the compromises made at the Constitutional Convention, the compromise of the electoral college. In this video, I want to discuss a different compromise: the compromise over slavery. Now, you’ll remembe…
15 Things You Envy In Other People
Nothing says I have no confidence in myself more than envying other people and being obvious about it. They seem to have it all while you’re here, stuck yet again. Well, today we’re talking about 15 things you envy in other people, so you can start doing …
Why Do People Act Badly? | The Story of God
In small-scale societies and ancestral communities, there were only a couple of hundred individuals. It was relatively easy to keep tabs on one another, and that was really important because social reputation matters. The problem is that the larger the s…
Second partial derivative test
In the last video, we took a look at this function ( f(x, y) = x^4 - 4x^2 + y^2 ), which has the graph that you’re looking at on the left. We looked for all of the points where the gradient is equal to zero, which basically means both partial derivatives …