yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Ask Sal Anything! Homeroom with Sal - Tuesday, October 19
Hi everyone, welcome to today’s homeroom live stream. Uh, today it’s just going to be me, so we’re going to do another ask me anything. So if you have any questions for me, literally about anything, start putting them on the message boards on Facebook or …
How Bicycles Changed Women's Lives | Origins: The Journey of Humankind
There are always consequences to what we create, often unintended. And some can cause serious problems. But sometimes, those unintended consequences are for the best. Nowhere is this more true than with our advancements in transportation. One early ride c…
Logarithmic functions differentiation | Advanced derivatives | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s say that Y is equal to log base 4 of x^2 + x. What is the derivative of y with respect to x going to be equal to? Now, you might recognize immediately that this is a composite function. We’re taking the log base 4 not just of x, but we’re taking tha…
She Is Not For You
And we had a night class. A few years ago, I’ll never forget it. This guy puts up his hand, who hasn’t contributed anything all night. He says, “Listen, I’ve been running this business out of my dorm, and I’m about to graduate. It’s a cloud business that …
Why I'm Finally Spending Money
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, a little over a year ago, I made a video breaking down exactly how much money I spend every month, where it all goes, and my philosophy is when it comes to saving money, investing, and trying to get the best value…
The Reagans: A Love Story | Killing Reagan
You know, they have been underestimating us all our lives. It was a fairy tale, the two of them against the world. She understood him and knew him and what he needed. He was a very private individual, by all reports very shy, so he had a very good manner …