yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
There's an Art to Getting Brilliant People to Surprise Themselves - Kevin Slavin of The Shed
I had a there were a couple questions from the internet, but I figured we could just start with kind of what we were talking about before about education in general. Sure. So, as you’re a dad now and you’re thinking about education, having now, you know, …
Exploring Saturn's Moons | Mission Saturn
This mission has been anything but straightforward. We have to adapt; we have to be agile to make sure that we don’t put a $3 billion asset in harm’s way. If you want to effect what’s coming up, you need—these flybys are planned out many, many months and …
Binompdf and binomcdf functions | Random variables | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is use a graphing calculator to answer some questions dealing with binomial random variables. This is useful because if you’re taking the AP Stats, the Advanced Placement Statistics test, you are allowed to use a graph…
Creating modules | Intro to CS - Python | Khan Academy
We’ve been writing our code all in a single file, but as our programs get longer, our main logic tends to get buried underneath all of our function definitions, which can make the program hard to read. So, easy solution: what if we just took all those fun…
2015 AP Calculus BC 2d | AP Calculus BC solved exams | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Find the total distance traveled by the particle from time t equals zero to t equals one. Now let’s remember, they didn’t say find the total displacement; they said find the total distance traveled by the particle. So if something goes to the right by on…
US taxation trends in post war era | Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
[Instructor] In a previous video, we looked at this diagram over here, which shows the growth in per capita GDP since 1947, and it compares to that the growth in after-tax income of the bottom 90%. And what we said in that video is it looks like somethi…