yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
More Questions Than Answers | LA 92
I think it is devastating to the image of this city and especially to our police department. JOHN MACK: It’s very apparent that some– not all, but some– of those officers are clearly out of control. And they have to ultimately be willing to take a good, …
Software Engineer Turned Youtuber - Jarvis Johnson
All right, welcome to the podcast. Thanks for having me. So today, Jarvis Johnson, who is a software engineer and YouTube creator. Yeah, recently independent. Yeah, it’s almost like the reverse now. Now I’m a YouTube creator and a software engineer. Ye…
More formal treatment of multivariable chain rule
Hello everyone. So this is what I might call a more optional video. In the last couple of videos, I talked about this multivariable chain rule, and I gave some justification. It might have been considered a little bit handwavy by some. I was doing a lot o…
Let's Buy a Car! | Teacher Resources | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
[Music] Con Academy financial literacy theater proudly presents the purchase. This is Wall-E. Say hi to the people, Wall-E. Hi to the people, Wall-E! Wally is about to buy a car from a dealership. Oh boy! Unfortunately for Wally, he is the world’s mo…
Khan Academy Ed Talks with Ned Johnson - February 2, 2022
Hello and welcome to Ed Talks with Khan Academy! I’m Kristen De Cerva, the Chief Learning Officer here at Khan Academy, and I’m excited today to talk to Ned Johnson, who’s an author, speaker, and founder of PrepMatters, which is a company providing academ…
Path independence for line integrals | Multivariable Calculus | Khan Academy
What I want to do in this video is establish a reasonably powerful condition in which we can establish that a vector field or that a line integral of a vector field is path independent. When I say that, I mean that let’s say I were to take this line inte…