yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Conclusion for a two-sample t test using a P-value | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A sociologist studying fertility in France and Switzerland wanted to test if there was a difference in the average number of babies women in each country have. The sociologists obtained a random sample of women from each country. Here are the results of t…
How AI Is Saving Humanity
The first ultra intelligent machine is the last invention that man need ever make. The statement was made by mathematician Irving John Good in 1965. He was envisioning a machine smarter than any human who had ever lived, one that would design even smarter…
Citizenship in early America, 1840s-1870s | Citizenship | High school civics | Khan Academy
In the last video, we discussed who did and did not have citizenship and voting rights from 1789 to the 1830s. To summarize, citizenship was reserved for white men, women, and children. By the 1830s, the right to vote extended to all white men, regardless…
Impose | Vocabulary | Khan Academy
Hey there wordsmiths! This video is about the word impose. Impose, it’s a verb, and it means to force something onto others, kind of like how I impose my taste in music on you in these videos. You didn’t ask for this; I just put it on to you, which is in…
Behind the Scenes of Marvel Studios' Moon Knight | National Geographic
I’d love to take this opportunity to show you around with Moon Knight. We’re in a very different world. The world building is so complete and interesting, and it’s hard to paint such a big canvas. While you watch the show, you will learn about ancient Eg…
Verifying inverse functions by composition | Mathematics III | High School Math | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] Let’s say that f of x is equal to x plus 7 to the third power, minus one. And let’s say that g of x is equal to the cube root of x plus one, the cube root of x plus one, minus seven. Now, what I wanna do now is evaluate f of g of x. I wanna …