yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Why The War on Drugs Is a Huge Failure
Over 40 years ago, US President Richard Nixon declared drug abuse public enemy number one, starting an unprecedented global campaign, the War on Drugs. Today, the numbers are in. The War on Drugs is a huge failure, with devastating unintended consequences…
Kevin O'Leary: Don't Vilify Capitalism - Fox and Friends
Our truth on men, women, and money: 50 common money mistakes and how to fix them. He joins us this morning, Kevin. Thanks for joining us; you’re a brave man. The look in that woman’s face—I think she was a stand-in for many who thought, “Huh, you’re defe…
Confidence intervals for the difference between two proportions | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Let’s review calculating confidence intervals for proportions. So, let’s say I have a population and I care about some proportion. Let’s say I care about the proportion of folks that are left-handed. I don’t know what that is, and so I take a sample of s…
5 AMAZING Experiments and "Sauciest of the Week" !
Hey, Vsauce. It’s Michael with two big announcements. Count them, two. First of all, there’s a brand new episode of Vsauce Leanback that you can start by clicking the link at the top of this video’s description. This week the topic is crazy and classic s…
Standard normal table for proportion below | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
A set of middle school students’ heights are normally distributed with a mean of 150 cm and a standard deviation of 20 cm. Darnell is a middle school student with a height of 161.405, so it would have a shape that looks something like that. That’s my hand…
7 Best Questions Asked at Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting
Why are you recommending listeners to buy now yet you’re not comfortable buying now as evidenced by your huge cash position? Well hey, as I just explained, the position isn’t that huge. When I look at worst-case possibilities, I would say that there are …