yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Endocrine system introduction
What you see in these pictures is a forward view of a transparent man or a semi-transparent man, and this is a posterior back view of a semi-transparent woman. But what are these organs that are depicted? These organs secrete molecules into the bloodstre…
10 STOIC PRINCIPLES TO BUILD SELF DISCIPLINE | MARCUS AURELIUS | STOICISM INSIGHTS
Imagine waking up every day with a crystal clear sense of purpose, not swayed by setbacks, unfazed by the chaos around you, and relentlessly focused on what truly matters. It sounds almost superhuman, doesn’t it? Yet, this was the everyday reality for one…
Estimating adding large numbers by rounding
Let’s say that we run an egg farm. Yesterday, we went out and we collected 398 eggs from the chickens, and then today we went out and we collected 251 eggs from the chickens. What we’re curious about is roughly how many eggs do we now have that we’ve coll…
Meth Smuggling Model | Locked Up Abroad
At that point in time, my main mission was to get it back to Australia. We bought a whole heap of crystal meth from Zack’s suppliers—big snaplock bags of drugs. So, we bought a whole heap of gift sets that had bath salts in them. There was a process; we w…
Groundhog Day Explained
February is home to one of the most important holidays of the year not to forget: Groundhog Day. If you live outside of Can-merica, then you might not know what a groundhog is, so… here you go: this is a groundhog. They’re basically giant grumpy squirrels…
Representing systems of equations with matrices | Matrices | Precalculus | Khan Academy
I’m a big fan of looking at the same problem in different ways or different ways to conceptualize them. For example, if I had a system of three equations with three unknowns, let me just make one up: Three x minus two y minus z is equal to negative one. …