yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
Polynomial special products: difference of squares | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
Earlier in our mathematical adventures, we had expanded things like ( x + y \times x - y ). Just as a bit of review, this is going to be equal to ( x \times x ), which is ( x^2 ), plus ( x \times \text{negative } y ), which is negative ( xy ), plus ( y \t…
See How Syrian Zoo Animals Escaped a War-Ravaged City | National Geographic
[Music] This is what we hoped for because this was a dangerous mission. This was people who risk their lives to go in and help these animals. These animals really suffer not only from lack of food, medicine, and water, but also from the military conflict …
Letting Someone Go | Taoism for Broken Hearts
Letting Someone Go | Taoism for Heartbreak The philosophy of Taoism revolves around letting go, accepting, yielding, and going with the flow. All Taoist sages seem to agree that it’s better to be detached and indifferent, allow change to happen, and move…
AI, Startups, & Competition: Shaping California’s Tech Future
Hey guys, please find your seats. We’re going to get started. It’s great to see you all! We have a very exciting topic today with some very exciting speakers. I’m so excited to be here with you to talk about AI competition and startups. Before I recogniz…
Gradient and contour maps
So here I want to talk about the gradient in the context of a contour map. Let’s say we have a multivariable function, a two-variable function, f of x, y, and this one is just going to equal x * y. So we can visualize this with a contour map just on the …
Cory Doctorow and Joe Betts-Lacroix on Adversarial Interoperability
Alright guys, welcome to the podcast. Excellent, thank you. So today we have Cory Doctorow and Joe Betts-Lacroix. Joe, could you start it off? Sure, so Cory, when I saw your talk at Burning Man, it was last time and I heard you mentioned adversarial inte…