yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?


2m read
·Nov 3, 2024

You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It's particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it's not quite forever. Right at some point, you run into the Planck length. There's the Planck time, there's the Planck length, there's even the Planck mass, which is actually quite a large mass.

These things don't have any physical significance. It's not like the Planck time is the shortest possible time, and it's not like the Planck length is the shortest possible length. The reason for that is because these Planck things are part of quantum theory, but length is not described by quantum theory. It's described by the general theory of relativity, and in that theory, space is infinitely divisible.

There is no smallest possible length or time. This illuminates an ancient tension between the discrete and the continuous because quantum theory seems to suggest that things are discrete. For example, there's a smallest possible particle of gold—the gold atom. There's a smallest possible particle of electricity—the electron. There's a smallest possible particle of light—the photon.

In quantum theory, we have this idea of discreteness—that there is a smallest possible thing from which everything else is built. But in general relativity, the idea is the opposite. It says things can continuously vary, and if the mathematics requires that things be continuously variable, so they can be differentiated and so on.

The idea there is that you can keep on dividing up space, and you can keep on dividing up time. So physicists understand that there is this contradiction at the deepest level of our most foundational explanations in physics. It's one of the reasons why there are these attempts to try and unify quantum theory and general relativity.

Because what is the fundamental nature of reality? Is it that things can be infinitely divisible? Or is it that we must stop somewhere or other? Because if it's infinitely divisible, then quantum theory might have to be subservient to general relativity. But we just don't know.

More Articles

View All
A Little Redneck Ingenuity | Port Protection
Blade spring and all, it’s the time to get prepared for the upcoming winter. You just can’t run down to the hardware store and get what you need; you have to go out and work for it physically, and it takes a lot of time. Eighteen-year resident Tim Curley…
Putting a Penny on John Wilkes Booth's Grave
Let’s talk about Robert Todd Lincoln. He was Abraham Lincoln’s son, and in 1863 or ‘64, he slipped at the New Jersey train depot. He was almost crushed by a train car, but his life was saved when a man reached out and grabbed him, pulling him back. That m…
What Could Trigger a Shark Attack? | Rogue Shark
Across the Whit Sundays, hundreds of baited cameras are deployed and listening stations fixed as scientists race to understand why these previously safe waters have turned deadly. As the footage comes in, one big clue emerges: the poor visibility. What w…
Lorentz transformation derivation part 1 | Special relativity | Physics | Khan Academy
So, in all of our videos on special relativity so far, we’ve had this little thought experiment where I’m floating in space and, right at time equals zero, a friend passes by in her spaceship. She’s traveling in the positive x direction; velocity is equal…
The Sinking of the SS Athenia | WW2 Hell Under the Sea
NARRATOR: As the opening day of the Second World War fades, Lemp strains to identify the ship in front of him. CHRISTIAN JENTZSCH: It’s behaving, in his opinion, like an auxiliary cruiser because it’s zig-zagging and it’s blacked out. And he even imagine…
Gravitational potential energy at large distances | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
Let’s do a little bit of review of potential energy and especially gravitational potential energy because in this video we’re going to get a little bit more precise. So, let’s say that I have an object here. It has a mass of m, and I were to change its p…