yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

A Scientific Explanation of the Human Mind | Daniel Siegel | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

One aspect of the mind, beyond subjective experience, consciousness, maybe even information processing, these are facets of the mind that are good descriptions; let's just put those to the side for now. This fourth facet of the mind has a definition, not just a description. This facet of the mind can be defined this way: the emergent self-organizing embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy and information.

And if we take that apart step-by-step, we can see that the system we're talking about is called a complex system. That means it's open to influences from outside of itself, it's capable of being chaotic, and it's non-linear, meaning small inputs have large and difficult-to-predict results. When you have those three characteristics, math says that system is a complex system.

And once we're in the realm of complex systems, we find that these complex systems have what are called emergent properties. The interaction of the elements of the system gives rise to these properties that cannot be reduced to the singular elements that are interactions give rise to them. The notion that complex systems have emergent properties is sometimes responded to by various scientists or even the general public as very confusing, sometimes even ridiculous.

What I do in the book Mind is I actually put some quotes from some scientists who actually see emergence as not only a scientific property of complex systems but as a necessary way of understanding what it is that emergence, for example, why clouds have the beautiful ways that they unfold across the sky. That's an emergent property of water molecules and air molecules that form the clouds, and the emergent property there is self-organization that's determining how it unfolds.

So when you come to the emergent property of self-organization, then you also get people saying, "Well, that just doesn't feel right; it doesn't feel intuitive," and I totally share that initial response. Self-organization has a strange reality where, number one, as an emergent property, it's the interaction of the elements of the system—in this case, energy and information flow—that is giving rise to it; that's what an emergent property means. It can't be reduced to the singular elements.

But as a self-organizing emergent property, it means it's arising from something; that's the emergent part, but then it's turning back and regulating that from which it is arising, which is completely non-intuitive. That's called a recursive feature. Recursive means it has a feedback loop; it's a feedback system, it feeds back on itself.

So even there, as I'm speaking to you, I'm doing an assessment of what's going on. I say feedbacks; no, it feeds back. So, what that means is that arising from the system is self-organization; it then regulates the interaction of the elements of the system so that self-organization is then continually influencing itself, which is completely counterintuitive.

So here's the amazing thing: it's a proven property of our universe that complex systems have this recursive property to it. It's probably why people have not really gone to these emergent properties because, especially self-organization, it's not intuitive. The second reason I think people haven't gone here is because this definition of the mind as the emergent self-organizing embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy information is placing the mind in "two places at once," within your body and between you and other people and you and the planet.

So this irritates people because, first of all, many people point to their head when they talk about their mind, and they place the mind inside the skull. Fine. But even if you kept the mind only inside the skin-encased body, you'd feel okay with the word embodied, and many people do.

However, once you say it's both embodied and relational, you get into this really interesting new way of thinking because you say, "How could one thing, mind, be both within and between in two places?" Well, here's a way to think about it: our fundamental element we're proposing is energy and in...

More Articles

View All
Mathilde Collin on Feature Prioritization and Employee Retention at Front
I think the most pressing and important question is this first one from Tomas Grannis about Lego. Yes, what’s your favorite Lego theme? Yeah, my favourite Lego theme is something that not a lot of people know. It’s called Ideas. Okay, and so basically yo…
The Future of Cyberwarfare | Origins: The Journey of Humankind
NARRATOR: September 11, 2001, terror strikes set the tone for warfare in the 21st century. But the 21st century has also seen the rise of another kind of warfare— warfare that lets nations and loners do battle without guns or bombs. These days, the bigges…
Bitcoin Just Ended Investing | The NEW 60/40 Rule
What’s up, ding dongs? It’s Poinky Doink here! There you go, I said it! But anyway, I never thought I would be making a video on this topic today. But research has just come out that claims the traditional way investors grow their wealth, build their mon…
Graphs of rational functions: vertical asymptotes | High School Math | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] We’re told, let f of x equal g of x over x squared minus x minus six, where g of x is a polynomial. Which of the following is a possible graph of y equals f of x? And they give us four choices. The fourth choice is off right over here. And l…
Miyamoto Musashi | The Path of the Loner
At the age of fifteen, Miyamoto Musashi went on ‘musha shugyō’, which means ‘warrior’s pilgrimage’. During this time of his life, he traveled the land practicing his skills independently and engaged in a series of duels. After he received ronin status, he…
Interpreting direction of motion from velocity-time graph | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
An object is moving along a line. The following graph gives the object’s velocity over time. For each point on the graph, is the object moving forward, backward, or neither? So pause this video and see if you can figure that out. All right, now let’s do …