yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

A Scientific Explanation of the Human Mind | Daniel Siegel | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

One aspect of the mind, beyond subjective experience, consciousness, maybe even information processing, these are facets of the mind that are good descriptions; let's just put those to the side for now. This fourth facet of the mind has a definition, not just a description. This facet of the mind can be defined this way: the emergent self-organizing embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy and information.

And if we take that apart step-by-step, we can see that the system we're talking about is called a complex system. That means it's open to influences from outside of itself, it's capable of being chaotic, and it's non-linear, meaning small inputs have large and difficult-to-predict results. When you have those three characteristics, math says that system is a complex system.

And once we're in the realm of complex systems, we find that these complex systems have what are called emergent properties. The interaction of the elements of the system gives rise to these properties that cannot be reduced to the singular elements that are interactions give rise to them. The notion that complex systems have emergent properties is sometimes responded to by various scientists or even the general public as very confusing, sometimes even ridiculous.

What I do in the book Mind is I actually put some quotes from some scientists who actually see emergence as not only a scientific property of complex systems but as a necessary way of understanding what it is that emergence, for example, why clouds have the beautiful ways that they unfold across the sky. That's an emergent property of water molecules and air molecules that form the clouds, and the emergent property there is self-organization that's determining how it unfolds.

So when you come to the emergent property of self-organization, then you also get people saying, "Well, that just doesn't feel right; it doesn't feel intuitive," and I totally share that initial response. Self-organization has a strange reality where, number one, as an emergent property, it's the interaction of the elements of the system—in this case, energy and information flow—that is giving rise to it; that's what an emergent property means. It can't be reduced to the singular elements.

But as a self-organizing emergent property, it means it's arising from something; that's the emergent part, but then it's turning back and regulating that from which it is arising, which is completely non-intuitive. That's called a recursive feature. Recursive means it has a feedback loop; it's a feedback system, it feeds back on itself.

So even there, as I'm speaking to you, I'm doing an assessment of what's going on. I say feedbacks; no, it feeds back. So, what that means is that arising from the system is self-organization; it then regulates the interaction of the elements of the system so that self-organization is then continually influencing itself, which is completely counterintuitive.

So here's the amazing thing: it's a proven property of our universe that complex systems have this recursive property to it. It's probably why people have not really gone to these emergent properties because, especially self-organization, it's not intuitive. The second reason I think people haven't gone here is because this definition of the mind as the emergent self-organizing embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy information is placing the mind in "two places at once," within your body and between you and other people and you and the planet.

So this irritates people because, first of all, many people point to their head when they talk about their mind, and they place the mind inside the skull. Fine. But even if you kept the mind only inside the skin-encased body, you'd feel okay with the word embodied, and many people do.

However, once you say it's both embodied and relational, you get into this really interesting new way of thinking because you say, "How could one thing, mind, be both within and between in two places?" Well, here's a way to think about it: our fundamental element we're proposing is energy and in...

More Articles

View All
Building the Wolf Pack | Badlands, Texas
That was my jury. I really think that was obviously a good jury that we had. I’ve come to look at the jury like a wolf pack that you’re about to get, and you’re about to put that pack together. So you’ve got to pick you an alpha leader. Then you’re going …
Using the distributive property when multiplying
What we’re going to do in this video is dig a little bit deeper into our understanding of multiplication. And just as an example, we’re going to use four times seven. Some of you might know what four times seven is, but even in this case, I think you migh…
Warren Buffett's 5 Rules for Money
So if you clicked on this video, it’s fair to say that you want to learn how to build wealth and not be broke. Thankfully for us, billionaire investor Warren Buffett has provided us with five key principles that will help you start building wealth and avo…
Woodpeckers Defend Their Food Supply | National Geographic
[music playing] NARRATOR: Day breaks over the lovely forested south rim of the canyon, lighting up a dead pine that would seem to have little purpose. But this pine is the central bank and trust of the acorn woodpecker. And every inch is studded with nea…
Introduction to life insurance | Insurance | Financial literacy | Khan Academy
So let’s talk a little bit about what’s probably not your favorite subject. It’s definitely not mine, and that is death. Uh, and uh, it’s not something a lot of us think about. I remember when I was a kid and I used to see these ads on TV for life insuran…
Analyzing motion problems: total distance traveled | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Alexi received the following problem: a particle moves in a straight line with velocity v of t is equal to negative t squared plus 8 meters per second, where t is time in seconds. At t is equal to 2, the particle’s distance from the starting point was 5 m…