yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

A Scientific Explanation of the Human Mind | Daniel Siegel | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

One aspect of the mind, beyond subjective experience, consciousness, maybe even information processing, these are facets of the mind that are good descriptions; let's just put those to the side for now. This fourth facet of the mind has a definition, not just a description. This facet of the mind can be defined this way: the emergent self-organizing embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy and information.

And if we take that apart step-by-step, we can see that the system we're talking about is called a complex system. That means it's open to influences from outside of itself, it's capable of being chaotic, and it's non-linear, meaning small inputs have large and difficult-to-predict results. When you have those three characteristics, math says that system is a complex system.

And once we're in the realm of complex systems, we find that these complex systems have what are called emergent properties. The interaction of the elements of the system gives rise to these properties that cannot be reduced to the singular elements that are interactions give rise to them. The notion that complex systems have emergent properties is sometimes responded to by various scientists or even the general public as very confusing, sometimes even ridiculous.

What I do in the book Mind is I actually put some quotes from some scientists who actually see emergence as not only a scientific property of complex systems but as a necessary way of understanding what it is that emergence, for example, why clouds have the beautiful ways that they unfold across the sky. That's an emergent property of water molecules and air molecules that form the clouds, and the emergent property there is self-organization that's determining how it unfolds.

So when you come to the emergent property of self-organization, then you also get people saying, "Well, that just doesn't feel right; it doesn't feel intuitive," and I totally share that initial response. Self-organization has a strange reality where, number one, as an emergent property, it's the interaction of the elements of the system—in this case, energy and information flow—that is giving rise to it; that's what an emergent property means. It can't be reduced to the singular elements.

But as a self-organizing emergent property, it means it's arising from something; that's the emergent part, but then it's turning back and regulating that from which it is arising, which is completely non-intuitive. That's called a recursive feature. Recursive means it has a feedback loop; it's a feedback system, it feeds back on itself.

So even there, as I'm speaking to you, I'm doing an assessment of what's going on. I say feedbacks; no, it feeds back. So, what that means is that arising from the system is self-organization; it then regulates the interaction of the elements of the system so that self-organization is then continually influencing itself, which is completely counterintuitive.

So here's the amazing thing: it's a proven property of our universe that complex systems have this recursive property to it. It's probably why people have not really gone to these emergent properties because, especially self-organization, it's not intuitive. The second reason I think people haven't gone here is because this definition of the mind as the emergent self-organizing embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy information is placing the mind in "two places at once," within your body and between you and other people and you and the planet.

So this irritates people because, first of all, many people point to their head when they talk about their mind, and they place the mind inside the skull. Fine. But even if you kept the mind only inside the skin-encased body, you'd feel okay with the word embodied, and many people do.

However, once you say it's both embodied and relational, you get into this really interesting new way of thinking because you say, "How could one thing, mind, be both within and between in two places?" Well, here's a way to think about it: our fundamental element we're proposing is energy and in...

More Articles

View All
Cutting shapes into equal parts | Math | 3rd grade | Khan Academy
Is each piece equal to one-fourth of the area of the pie? So we have a pie, and it has one, two, three, four pieces. So it does have four pieces. So is one of those pieces equal to one-fourth of the pie? Well, let’s talk about what we mean when we have a…
Watch this Octopus Devour Crabs as It Jumps in the Water | Insane Animals | Secrets of the Octopus
Positioning rocks to make the perfect cover, the trap is set. Well-earned brain food. The island octopus has thought up, tested, and executed a killer hunting technique. Six months old, entirely self-taught, and already an accomplished strategist, as she…
Growing Up in the African Wild : Beyond ‘Savage Kingdom’ (Part 1) | Nat Geo Live
(Dramatic orchestral music) - Imagine you’re out in Africa. It’s night-time, you’re sleeping in the back of an open vehicle, and it’s so hot that you have no clothes on and you’re still sweating. All you can hear is the distant call of a hyena and an impa…
Financial Tips for Millennials: Part 2
The second thing is how do I save? Well, what should I put my saving in? When thinking about what you should put your saving in, realize that the least risk investment, the one you think is the least risk investment, which is cash, is the worst investmen…
Introduction to the coordinate plane
You’re probably familiar with the notion of a number line where we can take a number and associate it with a point on the number line. So for example, the number 2, I would go, I would start at 0, and I’d go 1, 2 to the right, and I would end up right ove…
Differentiating power series | Series | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
So we’re told here that ( f(x) ) is equal to this infinite series, and we need to figure out what is the third derivative of ( f ) evaluated at ( x=0 ). And like always, pause this video and see if you can work it out on your own before we do it together.…