yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

A Scientific Explanation of the Human Mind | Daniel Siegel | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

One aspect of the mind, beyond subjective experience, consciousness, maybe even information processing, these are facets of the mind that are good descriptions; let's just put those to the side for now. This fourth facet of the mind has a definition, not just a description. This facet of the mind can be defined this way: the emergent self-organizing embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy and information.

And if we take that apart step-by-step, we can see that the system we're talking about is called a complex system. That means it's open to influences from outside of itself, it's capable of being chaotic, and it's non-linear, meaning small inputs have large and difficult-to-predict results. When you have those three characteristics, math says that system is a complex system.

And once we're in the realm of complex systems, we find that these complex systems have what are called emergent properties. The interaction of the elements of the system gives rise to these properties that cannot be reduced to the singular elements that are interactions give rise to them. The notion that complex systems have emergent properties is sometimes responded to by various scientists or even the general public as very confusing, sometimes even ridiculous.

What I do in the book Mind is I actually put some quotes from some scientists who actually see emergence as not only a scientific property of complex systems but as a necessary way of understanding what it is that emergence, for example, why clouds have the beautiful ways that they unfold across the sky. That's an emergent property of water molecules and air molecules that form the clouds, and the emergent property there is self-organization that's determining how it unfolds.

So when you come to the emergent property of self-organization, then you also get people saying, "Well, that just doesn't feel right; it doesn't feel intuitive," and I totally share that initial response. Self-organization has a strange reality where, number one, as an emergent property, it's the interaction of the elements of the system—in this case, energy and information flow—that is giving rise to it; that's what an emergent property means. It can't be reduced to the singular elements.

But as a self-organizing emergent property, it means it's arising from something; that's the emergent part, but then it's turning back and regulating that from which it is arising, which is completely non-intuitive. That's called a recursive feature. Recursive means it has a feedback loop; it's a feedback system, it feeds back on itself.

So even there, as I'm speaking to you, I'm doing an assessment of what's going on. I say feedbacks; no, it feeds back. So, what that means is that arising from the system is self-organization; it then regulates the interaction of the elements of the system so that self-organization is then continually influencing itself, which is completely counterintuitive.

So here's the amazing thing: it's a proven property of our universe that complex systems have this recursive property to it. It's probably why people have not really gone to these emergent properties because, especially self-organization, it's not intuitive. The second reason I think people haven't gone here is because this definition of the mind as the emergent self-organizing embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy information is placing the mind in "two places at once," within your body and between you and other people and you and the planet.

So this irritates people because, first of all, many people point to their head when they talk about their mind, and they place the mind inside the skull. Fine. But even if you kept the mind only inside the skin-encased body, you'd feel okay with the word embodied, and many people do.

However, once you say it's both embodied and relational, you get into this really interesting new way of thinking because you say, "How could one thing, mind, be both within and between in two places?" Well, here's a way to think about it: our fundamental element we're proposing is energy and in...

More Articles

View All
Awesome Clock - Congreve Rolling Ball Clock
A Congreve clock, also known as Congress rolling ball clock or oscillating path rolling ball clock, is a type of clock that uses a ball rolling along a zigzag track rather than a pendulum to regulate time. It was invented by Sir William Congreve in 1808. …
Silicon Valley's Cargo Culting Problem
The idea that superficially copying Uber and copying the things that they said in interviews, pretending that you’re Travis, whatever, yes, doesn’t work. It’s just like wearing a black turtleneck does not make you Apple. Yeah, this is Michael Cyborg with…
Place value with decimals
What we’re going to do in this video is refresh our understanding of place value, but we’re going to dig a little bit deeper and think about place value in the context of decimals. So just as a refresher, if I had the number 973, this should be review fo…
Hear Kids' Honest Opinions on Being a Boy or Girl Around the World | National Geographic
Um, my name is Hil Kack. I’m 9 years old, and I’m 9 years old. The best thing about being a boy is like a boy, being very sporty. The best thing about being a girl is because girls can do a little bit more things than boys. [Music] The best thing about …
Endangered Penguins of South Africa - 360 | National Geographic
We now have approximately 2% of the historical natural population of African penguins. That’s the population that was recorded in the late 1800s. There have been several threats to penguins: egg collection, people collecting them, and more recently, the m…
Neil and Bill Talk Climate Change | StarTalk
In my field, just as a scientist, we view politics as a barrier between where we are and where we want to go. But of course, in Washington, politics is the currency of interaction. So, how do you, as a professional politician, balance what is objectively …