yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Adding rational expression: unlike denominators | High School Math | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Pause the video and try to add these two rational expressions. Okay, I'm assuming you've had a go at it. Now we can work through this together.

So, the first thing that you might have hit when you tried to do it is you realize that they have different denominators. It's hard to add fractions when they have different denominators. You need to rewrite them so that you have a common denominator.

The easiest way to get a common denominator is you can just multiply the two denominators, especially in a case like this where they don't seem to share any factors. Both of these have factors you can get, and they don't share anything in common.

So, let's set up a common denominator. This is going to be equal to something. Let's see, it's going to be equal to something over our common denominator. Let's make it 2x. Let me do this in another color. So, we're going to make it ( 2x - 3 ) times ( 3x + 1 ), and then plus something else over ( 2x - 3 ) times ( 3x + 1 ).

To go from just ( 2x - 3 ) here in the denominator to ( 2x \times (3x + 1) ), we multiply the denominator by ( 3x + 1 ). So, if we do that to the denominator, we don't want to change the value of the rational expression we have; we'd also have to do that to the numerator.

So, the original numerator was ( 5x ) (doing that in blue color), and now we're going to multiply it by the ( 3x + 1 ). So, times ( 3x + 1 ). Notice I didn't change the value of this expression; I multiplied by ( \frac{3x + 1}{3x + 1} ), which is 1 as long as ( 3x + 1 ) does not equal zero.

So, let's do the same thing over here. Over here, I have a denominator of ( 3x + 1 ). I multiply it by ( 2x - 3 ). So, I would take my numerator, which is ( -4x^2 ), and I would also multiply it by ( 2x - 3 ). Let me put parentheses around this so it doesn't look like I'm subtracting ( 4x^2 ).

So, then I can rewrite all of this as being equal to... Well, in the numerator, I’m going to have ( 5x \times 3x ), which is ( 15x^2 ) and ( 5x \times 1 ), which is ( + 5x ).

And then, over here (let me do this in green), let's see... I could do ( -4x^2 \times 2 ) which would be ( -8x^2 ), and then ( -4x^2 \times -3 ) which is ( +12x^2 ).

Did I do that right? Oh, let me be very careful. My spider sense could tell that I did something shady. In fact, if you want to pause the video, you could see and try to figure out what I just did that's wrong.

So, ( -4x^2 \times 2x ) is ( -8x^3 ), and then ( -4x^2 \times -3 ) is ( +12x^2 ). Now, our entire denominator, our entire denominator, we have a common denominator now, so we were able to just add everything.

It's ( (2x - 3)(3x + 1) ), and let's see how we can simplify this. So, this is all going to be equal to... Let me draw and make sure we recognize it's a rational expression.

And so let's see, we can look at, our highest degree term here is the ( -8x^3 ). So, it's ( -8x^3 ), and then we have ( 15x^2 ) and we also have ( +12x^2 ). We could add those two together to get ( 27x^2 ).

So, we've already taken care of this. We've taken care of those two, and we're just left with ( +5x ). So, all of that is over ( (2x - 3)(3x + 1) ), and we are all done.

It doesn't seem like there's any easy way to simplify this further. You could factor out an ( x ) out of the numerator, but that's not going to cancel out with anything in the denominator. And it looks like we are all done.

More Articles

View All
More Questions Than Answers | LA 92
I think it is devastating to the image of this city and especially to our police department. JOHN MACK: It’s very apparent that some– not all, but some– of those officers are clearly out of control. And they have to ultimately be willing to take a good, …
Starbucks Stock: Are Silly Incentives Burning Shareholders? (w/ @HamishHodder)
[Music] Hey guys, welcome back to the channel. We’re continuing on with the new money advent calendar for yet another episode and yet another collaboration. This time I’ve got someone that you guys would be very familiar with, and that is of course Hamis…
Is the Universe Discrete or Continuous?
You said that we went from atoms in the time of Democritus down to nuclei, and from there to protons and neutrons, and then to quarks. It’s particles all the way down. To paraphrase Feynman, we can keep going forever, but it’s not quite forever. Right at …
How Stoics deal with jerks, narcissists, and other difficult people
Have you ever found yourself amid rush hour on public transportation, packed like sardines, only to be met with the unmistakable scent of sweat from the individual before you? Well, this situation may trigger some irritation. Especially when this person t…
Real vs. nominal interest rate | Banking | Financial Literacy | Khan Academy
Let’s think about two different scenarios and decide which one is a better world for us. So, there is scenario one where, lucky day, we got a raise at work. We are now making 3% more than we used to make. That sounds good, but there’s a little bit of a t…
The Ponzi Factor: Proof by Definition
I talked with the author who has written a book so dangerous if this information becomes mainstream it alters the entire engine of our economy. Tong Lu has revealed just how our stock market is the dictionary definition of a Ponzi scheme. Here’s my conver…