yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Big Bang Evidence: Frozen Higgs, Frozen Beer, and Gravity Waves | Lawrence Krauss | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Our picture of the earliest moments of the universe has been evolving, and I'm happy to say, in some sense, has more empirical support than it did before. The discovery of the Higgs field implies that you can get fields that freeze in empty space. And that's a central part of what we think happened in the very early universe.

And if we can detect gravitational waves from the Big Bang, we'd have a window on the universe back to a time when it was a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a second old, answering questions about the origin of the universe as we know it—ideas that I speculated upon in my last book, for example—for which we have new evidence that I've described in my new book.

But because the temperature of the universe and the energies and particles were so extreme at that early time—when the entire visible universe was contained in a region that was smaller than the size of an atom—there's a wonderful symbiosis between large scales and small scales.

And if we can probe the early universe back to a time that I described, we'll actually be probing physics on scales that are much smaller than we can see at the Large Hadron Collider, 12 orders of magnitude smaller in scale (or higher in energy) than we can probe with our highest-energy accelerator now. To build an accelerator that would directly probe those energies, we would have to have an accelerator that's not just 26 km around, as the Large Hadron Collider is, but whose circumference is the earth-moon distance, and that's not going to be built in our lifetime (and probably ever).

So we may have to rely on the universe to give us new information, and that's why we're looking for such signals. When the universe was a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a second old, our current picture suggests: A field very similar to the Higgs field froze in space, but it was in what is called a metastable state.

Sort of like… if you have a beer party and you put beer in the freezer because you forgot to until the few minutes before the party, and then during the party you forget that it's in the freezer, and you take it out later. And it's there—liquid—and you open it up, and suddenly it turns to ice, and the bottle cracks: The beer is in a metastable state.

At that temperature, it would rather be frozen except it's under a high pressure. The minute you release the pressure, it freezes instantaneously, releasing a lot of energy. As our universe cooled, we think the same thing happened; basically, a field got frozen but in the wrong configuration, and as the universe cooled, suddenly—boom!—like those beer bottles, it changed its state, releasing a huge amount of energy, creating the hot Big Bang.

Now the interesting thing is, while it was in that metastable state and storing energy, general relativity tells us that if you have a field in empty space that's storing energy, it produces a gravitational effect that's repulsive, not attractive. So during that brief time, gravity is repulsive, and the expansion of our universe started speeding up faster and faster and faster, and the size of our universe (we think) increased by a factor of 10 to the 30th in scale, or at least 10 to the 90th in volume, in a time interval of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a second.

That means it went from the size of an atom to the size of a basketball in a short time, and that rapid expansion produced characteristics which pervaded the universe today: The fact that our observed universe looks flat, the fluctuations, and the cosmic microwave background radiation all came from quantum fluctuations that happened during inflation.

Inflation is the only First Principles idea that, in principle, explains why our universe looks the way it does. And what's wonderful about it is it doesn't require any exotic ideas of quantum gravity or theories we don't have; it's based on ideas that are central to our current understanding of the standard model of particle physics, just extrapolating them somewhat.

So it's very well-motivated; even though it is hard to believe that it could have happened, we think it did.

More Articles

View All
Brian Keating: I’m Spending $200 Million To Explore Existence! How God Fits Into Science Explained!
This is the shrapnel of an exploded star, and this is a meteorite schem from over 4 billion years ago, and this is what Elon will kill for. Wow! And all of this is to understand that fundamental question people want to know: how did we get here, and how d…
Lewis diagrams for molecules | Chemistry | Khan Academy
Let’s draw LS draw structures for certain molecules. It’s a lot of fun to do that. Okay, now the first thing we need to do to draw these structures is to identify the number of valence electrons. Okay, and we’ve talked about these valence electrons in ou…
Exploring Dog-Human Communication
What if you could communicate with your pet? If they could just tell you how much they love you, how when you leave the house to go to work, it feels like they’ve just spent a week without you? In the 1970s, a gorilla named Koko learned sign language. Wi…
Tangents of polynomials | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
What you see here in blue, this is the graph of ( y ) is equal to ( f(x) ) where ( f(x) ) is equal to ( x^3 - 6x^2 + x - 5 ). What I want to do in this video is think about what is the equation of the tangent line when ( x ) is equal to 1, so we can visua…
Ethical Rudeness | The Philosophy of Mencius
We live in an age in which freedom of speech and saying what we want is seen as one of the most important tries of human being. But does that make rudeness a virtue? While I think that people should have freedom of speech and that unpopular opinions shou…
Differentiating power series | Series | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
So we’re told here that ( f(x) ) is equal to this infinite series, and we need to figure out what is the third derivative of ( f ) evaluated at ( x=0 ). And like always, pause this video and see if you can work it out on your own before we do it together.…