yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Over- and under-estimation of Riemann sums | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Consider the left and right Riemann sums that would approximate the area under y is equal to g of x between x equals 2 and x equals 8. So we want to approximate this light blue area right over here. Are the approximations overestimations or underestimations? So let's just think about each of them.

Let's consider the left and the right Riemann sums. First, the left, and I'm just going to write left for short, but I'm talking about the left Riemann sum. They don't tell us how many subdivisions to make for our approximation, so that's up to us to decide. Let's say we went with three subdivisions. Let's say we wanted to make them equal; they don't have to be, but let's say we do.

So the first one would go from two to four. The next one would go from four to six, and the next one from six to eight. If we do a left Riemann sum, you use the left side of each of these subdivisions in order to find the height. You evaluate the function at the left end of each of those subdivisions for the height of our approximating rectangles.

So we would use g of 2 to approximate for or to set the height of our first approximating rectangle, just like that. And then we would use g of 4 for the next rectangle, so we would be right over there. And then you'd use g of 6 to represent the height of our third and our final rectangle right over there.

Now when it's drawn out like this, it's pretty clear that our left Riemann sum is going to be an overestimation. How do we know that? Because these rectangles, the area that they're trying to approximate, are always contained in the rectangles, and these rectangles have this surplus area. So they're always going to be larger than the areas that they're trying to approximate.

In general, if you have a function that's decreasing over the interval that we care about right over here and strictly decreasing the entire time, if you use the left edge of each subdivision to approximate, you're going to have an overestimate. Because the left edge, the value of the function there, is going to be higher than the value of the function at any other point in the subdivision.

And so that's why for decreasing functions, the left Riemann sum is going to be an overestimation. Now let's think about the right Riemann sum, and you might already guess that's going to be the opposite, but let's visualize that. So let's just go with the same three subdivisions, but now let's use the right side of each of these subdivisions to define the height.

So for this first rectangle, the height is going to be defined by g of 4, so that's right over there. And then for the second one, it's going to be g of 6, so that is right over there. And for the third one, it's going to be g of 8. And so let me shade these in to make it clear which rectangles we're talking about. This would be the right Riemann sum to approximate the area.

It's very clear here that this is going to be an underestimate. We see in each of these intervals that the Riemann, the right Riemann sum, or the rectangle that we're using for the right Riemann sum, is a subset of the area that is trying to estimate. We're not able to; it doesn't capture this extra area right over here.

And once again, that is because this is a strictly decreasing function. So if you use the right endpoint of any one of these or the right side of any of these subdivisions in order to define the height, that right value of g is going to be the lowest value of g in that subdivision.

And so it's going to be a lower height than what you could even say is the average height of the value of the function over that interval. So you're going to have an underestimate in this situation. Now, if your function was strictly increasing, then these two things would be swapped around.

And of course, there are many functions that are neither strictly increasing nor decreasing, and then it would depend on the function and real, and sometimes even it would depend on the type of subdivisions you choose to decide whether you have an overestimate or an underestimate.

More Articles

View All
Why Millennials Should NOT Invest
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, as many of you know, I spend a lot of time on the internet. Like, half my day is spent browsing Reddit, reading up on investments, watching YouTube videos, and reacting to bad spending habits. I do all of this be…
Studying Kids Who Kill | The Story of God
Following the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in the United States, we were asked by the parents of children who lost their children there to analyze brains of kids that we’ve studied who’ve killed other people versus kids in prison who’ve not. When…
Showing segment congruence equivalent to having same length
In this video, we’re going to talk a little bit about segment congruence and what we have here. Let’s call this statement one. This is the definition of line segment congruence, or at least the one that we will use. Two segments are congruent; that means …
I Spent 72 Hours in Bhutan with National Geographic | Juanpa Zurita | Nat Geo’s Best of the World
I am currently standing on the longest suspension bridge of all Bhutan. I’m about to take you on a journey way up near some of the tallest mountains in the entire world. This country’s tiny, but mighty. And it’s in the Himalayas between Tibet and Nepal. T…
The Moon Landing | Generation X
5 4 3 2 all engine running lift off. We have a liftoff. 32 minutes past the hour, liftoff on Apollo 11 and our young dreams liftoff with it. Mankind is going to the moon and technology is paving the way. A new horizon is in our future and for Generation X…
Face-to-Face with a Bear - Meet the Expert | National Geographic
Welcome! It is so lovely to see you all here today. I’m your host, Lizzy Daly, and I am thrilled to be bringing you all on an epic journey to meet some of the world’s best scientists, wildlife experts, and National Geographic explorers from around the wor…