yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Finding decreasing interval given the function | Calculus | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's say we have the function ( f(x) = x^6 - 3x^5 ).

My question to you is, using only what we know about derivatives, try to figure out over what interval or intervals this function is decreasing. Pause the video and try to figure that out.

All right, now let's do this together. We know that a function is decreasing when its derivative is negative.

Or another way to say it, it's going to be decreasing when ( f'(x) < 0 ).

So what is ( f'(x) )? Well, we could use the derivative rules and derivative properties. We know we apply the power rule to ( x^6 ), we bring the 6 out front, or multiply the one coefficient here times 6 to get ( 6x^5 ).

We decrement that exponent minus bring down the 5 times the -3 to get -15 ( x^{4} ). Now, we need to figure out over what intervals this is going to be less than 0.

Let's see how we can simplify this a little bit. Both of these terms are divisible by ( x^4 ) and they're both divisible by 3.

So let's factor out ( 3x^4 ). If you factor out ( 3x^4 ) here, you're left with ( 2x - 5 ).

So we have:

[
3x^4(2x - 5) < 0.
]

Any interval where this is true, we are going to be decreasing.

Now, how do we get this to be less than 0? Well, if I take the product of two things and it's less than 0, that means that they have to have different signs.

Either one's positive and the other is negative, or one's negative and the other is positive. So we have two situations: we could say either:

  1. ( 3x^4 > 0 ) and ( 2x - 5 < 0 ) (this is one situation).

Or,

  1. ( 3x^4 < 0 ) and ( 2x - 5 > 0 ) (and I'll do this one in a different color).

Actually, let me stay on the second case first. Are there any situations where ( 3x^4 ) can be less than 0?

You take any number, you take it to the 4th power, and even if it's negative, it's going to become positive. So you can't get a negative expression right over here.

So, actually, the second condition is impossible to obtain. You can't get any situation for any ( x ) where ( 3x^4 < 0 ).

So we can rule this one out. This is our best hope.

So under what conditions is ( 3x^4 > 0 )?

Well, if you divide both sides by 3, you get ( x^4 > 0 ). If you think about it, this is going to be true for any ( x ) value that is not equal to 0.

Even if you have a negative value there, if you have -1, you take it to the fourth power and it becomes a positive 1.

Only 0 will be equal to 0 when you take it to the fourth power. So one way you could say this is going to be true for any non-zero ( x ), or we could just say ( x \neq 0 ).

This is a little more straightforward. We add 5 to both sides, we get ( 2x < 5 ).

Dividing both sides by 2, you get ( x < \frac{5}{2} ).

So it might be tempting to say, all right, the intervals that matter are all the ( x )'s less than ( \frac{5}{2} ), but ( x ) cannot be equal to 0.

Now, is that the entire interval where our function is decreasing?

Let's think about what happens at 0 itself. We are decreasing over the interval from negative infinity all the way up to 0.

We're also decreasing from 0 to ( \frac{5}{2} ). So if we're decreasing right to the left of 0 and we're decreasing right to the right of 0, we're actually going to be decreasing at 0 as well.

So there's something interesting here. Even though the derivative at ( x = 0 ) is going to be equal to 0, we are still decreasing there.

The interval that we care about, the interval over which we're decreasing, is just ( x < \frac{5}{2} ).

We can see that by graphing the function. I graphed it on Desmos, and you can see here that the function is decreasing from negative infinity.

It's decreasing at a slower and slower rate. We get to 0, still decreasing to the left of 0, and then it continues to decrease to the right of 0.

So any value, any ( x ) value to the left of 0, the value of the function is going to be larger than ( f(0) ).

And ( x ) to the right of 0, the value of the function is going to be less than the function at 0.

It's actually decreasing through 0, even though the slope of the tangent line at 0 is 0.

Even though it's not negative, and then we keep decreasing. So we're decreasing for all values of ( x < \frac{5}{2} ), which you can see visually here.

More Articles

View All
One-sided limits from graphs: asymptote | Limits and continuity | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So over here we have the graph of y is equal to G of x. What I want to do is figure out the limit of G of x as x approaches positive 6 from values that are less than positive 6, or you could say from the left, from the negative direction. So what is this …
9 Japanese Philosophies to Become Self-Disciplined and Stop Procrastinating
Have you ever struggled with procrastination or finding the motivation to get things done, feeling like you’re not living up to your own expectations? I won’t lie. I struggle with procrastination a lot, and it’s a challenge, especially when I have importa…
Bird Flight - Deep Dive #2 - Smarter Every Day 61
So, what do you do to hold a bird? Hold on tight and don’t be scared. That’s right! Okay, so today, on today’s deep dive here at Smarter Every Day, we’re going to learn about bird flight. When I went to Peru and shot high-speed video, I learned a whole lo…
How A Nuclear War Will Start - Minute by Minute
Mr. President! Nuclear missiles will strike our country in 14 minutes. I know it’s your first day in office, so I’m going to walk you through it, but you’re the only one who can authorize our nuclear retaliation in response, and you’ve only got a few minu…
Safari Live - Day 214 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Hello, hello, and welcome to your live Safari experience that happens every day, twice a day, except for this morning, wher…
The Fastest Way To Find Waldo
Here’s how to become scary good at finding Waldo. In 2015, data scientist Randall Olssen used all 68 of Waldo’s hiding spots in the seven primary books to build this kernel density estimate. So where’s Waldo really? He’s here! Now, there are more ways t…