yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Failure of Reconstruction | AP US History | Khan Academy


5m read
·Nov 10, 2024

How do you define freedom? Stop for a minute and picture what it means to be free. What comes into your mind? Traveling wherever you please? Having enough money to do what you want? Or is freedom better defined by what it's not: not having anyone telling you what to do, not being in prison?

Freedom is a core aspect of U.S. national identity. But if someone gave you a box labeled "Contents: Freedom," what would you expect to find inside? This was the question that the United States faced during Reconstruction, the period following the Civil War when the U.S. government, Southern state governments, and African Americans attempted to negotiate a new social and political order for the South.

However, what African Americans expected to find in the box labeled "Freedom" was very different from what their former enslavers wanted to put in it. Was freedom just the absence of slavery, as most white Southerners believed, or did it imply citizenship, political power, and economic self-sufficiency? Trying to solve this dilemma, Congress passed, and the states ratified, three new constitutional amendments during the Reconstruction era: the 13th Amendment, which ended the system of slavery in 1865; the 14th Amendment, which extended citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States in 1868; and the 15th Amendment, which gave black men the right to vote in 1870.

So, in just five years, African Americans in the South went from personal property to full civic participants—at least in theory. In reality, how different were definitions of freedom, citizenship, and democracy before and after Reconstruction? To really answer this question, we need to examine continuity and change in the Reconstruction era: what stayed the same and what changed in each of these three areas following the passage of the Reconstruction Amendments.

Okay, first let's look at continuities and changes in the definition of freedom. Before the end of slavery, African Americans had neither economic nor physical freedom. They didn't have control of their bodies or of their labor. The past system kept them from moving freely, and slavery itself meant that they couldn't choose where to work or earn money from their own work. So, how much did their physical and economic freedom change after the 13th Amendment outlawed slavery?

While their economic self-sufficiency went through some ups and downs, most African Americans believed that their years of unpaid toil entitled them to land of their own. U.S. Army General William Tecumseh Sherman redistributed Confederate territory on the coasts of Georgia and South Carolina to black families who farmed there for a few years, until Lincoln's successor, Andrew Johnson, gave all confiscated land back to its former owners. Instead, most black farmers became sharecroppers, renting a portion of a white landowner's farm in exchange for part of the crop yield. This gave black farmers a lot more freedom over their own work since they didn't have to work under an overseer, but economically, sharecropping kept black farmers, as well as small white farmers, in an endless cycle of debt and poverty.

After the 13th Amendment, most Southern state governments attempted to limit the physical freedom of African Americans as well, with statutes known as the Black Codes. Many of these codes defined anyone who wasn't under a labor contract as a vagrant who could be arrested and have their labor sold. Later, segregation limited the physical freedom of where Southern African Americans could go and what they could do. Laws like the Black Codes, which so obviously attempted to institute slavery by another name, led Congress to pass the 14th Amendment, which defined a U.S. citizen as anyone born or naturalized in the United States and specifically prevented states from infringing upon the rights of citizens.

Before the Civil War, citizenship was exclusively the privilege of white Americans. Non-white immigrants weren't eligible to become U.S. citizens, and the 1857 Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott declared that no African Americans could be citizens at all. The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, led to a huge increase in the number of U.S. citizens and decoupled citizenship from whiteness. Even the American-born children of Asian immigrants were citizens, but the Supreme Court defined the 14th Amendment very narrowly in the late 19th century, permitting many laws that discriminated on the basis of race. Only in the 20th century would the 14th Amendment become an important tool for civil rights activists to break down segregation.

Lastly, the 15th Amendment, ratified in 1870, extended the right to vote to black men. In the years leading up to the Civil War, with few exceptions, only white men had the right to vote. The 15th Amendment radically redefined the terms of American democracy. During Reconstruction, more than 2,000 African Americans held public office, including two U.S. Senators. But there were limits to this new broader definition of democracy. First, it didn't include women, much to the frustration of the women's suffrage movement. Then, as the federal government ceased to intervene to protect black citizens in the South in the late 1870s, Southern state governments imposed a range of voter suppression tactics to effectively bar African Americans from voting, which then reduced the likelihood of black politicians winning office. Not until the 1960s would African American voter registration once again reach Reconstruction-era levels.

So how much did the Reconstruction Amendments change definitions of freedom, citizenship, and democracy? Well, after the amendments, African Americans were free to own their own bodies and labor, but that was about it. The 14th and 15th Amendments led to short-lived revolutions in the concept of citizenship and in voting rights, but those rights had all but evaporated by the end of the century. Nevertheless, although they didn't have much of an impact in the short term, these amendments would lay the foundation for the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 60s.

More Articles

View All
The Top 5 BEST Investing Apps
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So, as usual, I always read all of the comments, and if you guys ask me to make a specific video, I will go ahead, I will listen, I will make the video. And this video is exactly that, because recently I’ve received n…
Worked example: Calculating the mass of a substance in a mixture | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We’re told that a 0.450 gram potassium supplement contains 22 percent potassium by mass. The potassium is present in the supplement as potassium chloride, which has a molar mass of 74.55 grams per mole. How many grams of potassium chloride are in the pota…
Why AI Hasn’t Blown Our Minds…Yet
Hypothetically, if AI is a bust in a bunch of different ways but it works extremely well fixing customer service, that’s still massive. It’s going to change our world; massive impact. Hello, this is Dalton plus Michael and today we’re going to talk about…
Rotational kinetic energy | Moments, torque, and angular momentum | Physics | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] When a major league baseball player throws a fast ball, that ball’s definitely got kinetic energy. We know that cause if you get in the way, it could do work on you, that’s gonna hurt. You gotta watch out. But here’s my question: does the fa…
Examples establishing conditions for MVT
This table gives us a few values of the function g, so we know what g of x is equal to at these values right over here: x is equal to negative 2, negative 1, 0, and 1. It says Raphael said that since g of 1 minus g of 0 over 1 minus 0 is equal to negative…
Lecture 3 - Before the Startup (Paul Graham)
That short. Like, long introductions are no good. Sam knows. Alright, ready, everybody? I’m not gonna ask if the mic is working like in every talk so far. I’ll just assume it’s working. No! No, fuck! All right, well make it work somebody. It works, …