yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

2015 AP Chemistry free response 4 | Chemistry | Khan Academy


6m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Answer the following questions about the solubility of calcium hydroxide, and they give us the solubility product.

Write a balanced chemical equation for the dissolution of solid calcium hydroxide in pure water.

So, we're going to start off with calcium hydroxide, and it is solid. It is going to be in equilibrium when it's dissolved. You have calcium ions that have a positive two charge. Writing aqueous here says it's dissolved in our solution, in a solution of water.

Then plus, you have your hydroxide ions also dissolved in the water. For every calcium, you have two hydroxides. We see that we are balanced: one calcium, one calcium; two hydroxides, two hydroxides.

All right, let's do the next part: calculate the molar solubility of calcium hydroxide, not in pure water but in a solution that already has a concentration of another salt, calcium nitrate. It has a 0.1 molar concentration.

0.1 M concentration of calcium nitrate, which you might recognize as a very soluble salt. It's very soluble; it's a nitrate salt, which is very soluble.

So, how do we think about this? How do we think about the molar solubility of calcium hydroxide? How much incremental calcium can be dissolved when you already have some calcium?

And for whatever the concentration of calcium that gets dissolved, you're going to have twice the concentration of hydroxide that gets dissolved. You might have guessed or intuited or have known that this will involve the solubility product.

So, the solubility product is equal to the concentration of the product of the concentrations of the two things that actually get dissolved. You have your calcium ions, and you have your hydroxide ions. Since you have two moles of this for every mole of the calcium, we square it just like that.

Now, some of you might be saying, "Hey, this looks kind of like an equilibrium constant." If we were dealing with an equilibrium constant, we would divide by the concentration of the reactants, and we could have done an equilibrium; we could have done an equilibrium constant here, used an equilibrium constant.

But the concentration of the reactants, this is in its solid state. If we imagine what's happening right over here, we have a block; you can imagine having a block of solid calcium hydroxide here inside the water, and we've been saturated.

So, we've saturated as much of the ions as we can into our solution. Every time you have some calcium hydroxide that gets dissolved, you have an equal amount that forms from the solution.

And so, if you're doing an equilibrium constant, you would divide by the concentration of the solid calcium hydroxide. We're not used to thinking about concentrations of solids in terms of molarity and things like that, but that's going to be constant because if there's any of the calcium hydroxide that gets dissolved, the volume goes down, and if any gets formed, the volume goes up.

So the concentration stays constant, and so the convention is you multiply both sides by that to get a solubility product, and that's where the solubility product comes from.

And I'll do another video that goes into much more depth than that. But anyway, how do we use this? Well, we already have. Let me write this down.

We already have some calcium ions, so we already have 0.10 molar calcium ions dissolved—or maybe I don't even have to write "dissolved" there. We already have that in the solution, and we are going to add—we're going to add X molar.

I guess I could say calcium ions through dissolving the calcium hydroxide. And that means that we would have a two X molar concentration; I could write this way: concentration of hydroxide, because for every concentration of calcium ions, you're going to have twice the concentration of hydroxide.

So how do we use that with this solubility product? Well, you already have this right over here; you already have 0.10 already. Then you're going to add X—so that's that right over there.

And I think this notation that I wrote here might be a little bit confusing, so bear with me. So, maybe it's actually—not putting the brackets there will make it a little bit easier to understand, because this is clearly already a concentration.

All right, so this is going to be the concentration of calcium ions; the ones that you already had plus the ones that you add.

And then your concentration of hydroxide, well, that's going to be 2X. For every calcium you add, you're going to add twice as many hydroxides, and of course, you square that, and that's going to be equal to the solubility product, which they tell us is 1.3 * 10^-6.

So we have 1.3 * 10^-6. Now, if you try to solve this outright, it's going to get quite complicated. You're going to end up with what this is going to be 4X^2, and you multiply it times this; you're going to get an X squared term, and you're going to get an X to the third term. Not that easy to solve!

A simplifying assumption that we make when we solve these, especially because this nitrate salt is so soluble—much less soluble than this hydroxide salt—and so you can assume this part right over here is approximately 0.1 since X is much smaller than 0.10.

That's the assumption you make, and you had to know that. Okay, well, first of all, this is going to be hard to solve the way it is. But then the fact that, well, we're adding a much less soluble thing to something that is already, you know, something that is nowhere close to saturation—this is a very high concentration.

We can go back field to see if we make this assumption, whatever we solve for X, if it gets us still pretty close to this solubility product.

So if we make that assumption, we get 1.3 * 10^-6 is equal to 0.10 * 4X^2. Or we could get X^2 is equal to 1.3 * 10^-6 divided by 0.10, and then times 4, or we could say divided by 0.40.

Or we could say that X is going to be the square root of this, so X is going to be equal to—let's get a calculator out.

So we have 1.3 e * 10^6 divided by 0.40 is equal to that. And now we want to take the square root of that.

And let's see—we're dealing with how many significant figures are over here. Well, looks like it's about two, so 0.0018. So, approximately—let me write that a little bit neater—approximately 0.0018 molar.

Let me see if does that make—is that what I got? Yeah, 0.0018 molar. And so that's our answer. If you want to feel better about it, you can substitute this back into our original equation here and say, "Okay, this does still get me something close to 1.3 * 10^-6," and if you try that, you will see that that is actually the case.

Now, let's do this last part in the box below: complete the particle representation diagram that includes four water molecules with proper orientation around the calcium ions.

Well, the water molecules we know are polar. If this is the oxygen here and this is a hydrogen, this is a hydrogen; we have our lone pairs of electrons here.

So, you have a partially negative charge there, and you have partially positive charges at the hydrogens that get their electrons hogged. So, you're going to orient it; and we just want us to draw four.

So the oxygen end is going to be oriented towards the positive calcium because you have a partially negative charge being attracted to the positive charge.

So that's one, that is two, that is three, and that is four. They told us to draw only four right over there.

And you, if you want to be clear, you can say that's an—those are oxygens right over there, and these are the hydrogens right over here.

The hydrogens have a partially— that end of the molecule has a partially positive charge, so it's going to be repelled from the calcium ion.

And then, the other side that has the lone pairs—well, that's going to have a partially negative charge; it's going to be attracted to the positive charge. And there you go.

More Articles

View All
Inflation Continues to Sky Rocket: How Warren Buffett Says You Should be Investing
Everyone is talking about inflation, inflation, inflation, inflation. This pesky little thing called inflation has probably been the most talked-about topic in finance this year, and this is likely for a good reason. The cost of mostly everything, from ho…
Kevin O'Leary | 40 Years Of Photography
I get asked so often about my interest in photography: where did it come from? Why do I do it? Well, let me explain. When I was graduating high school, I told my stepfather, “I really want to become a photographer because I just learned how to develop fil…
What One Woman Learned Trying to Run Across California | National Geographic
There’s a lot of debate about how professional runners should be left for the elite, and then on the other side, professional runners should just be anyone who’s making a living through running. I fit squarely in neither of those categories. [Music] I wou…
Bitcoin nears $10k: Why I’m NOT investing in Bitcoin (The Truth)
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, as you’re watching this right now, just know I am safe and sound in a bunker somewhere in the middle of nowhere, safe from all of the inevitable dislikes and extreme comments I’m gonna get on this video. Because e…
Inflation Just Went From BAD To WORSE
What’s up, your Graham? It’s Gas here, and it’s official: the stock market is backwards. Throughout the last week, news came out that retail sales are jumping, company earnings are soaring, employment growth accelerated by the highest level in 10 months, …
Cost vs Quality in Edtech – Keith Schacht, Avichal Garg, and Geoff Ralston
A vitro you found it prep me in 2001, sold it ten years later in 2011. That was actually the year we found it. Imagine K12, the world’s first educational technology accelerator. And, Keith, you founded Mystery Science, I think in 2013. We just celebrated …