yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the Trump presidency a religious cult? | Reza Aslan | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Eighty-one percent of white evangelicals voted for Donald Trump in the previous election. That’s a record. That’s more white evangelicals than voted for George W. Bush—and George W. Bush was a white evangelical. This makes no sense to people, especially when you consider that Trump is not just the most irreligious president in modern history, that his entire worldview makes a mockery of core Christian values like humility and empathy and care for the poor. That this individual who couldn’t even name a single verse in the bible when asked to do so, and yet - and yet - received a record number of votes by white evangelicals.

Scholars of religion—normal, rational people—have been trying to figure out why. Why? What happened? And I think that there’s a couple of things to keep in mind. Number one, it’s white evangelicals. Eighty-one percent of white evangelicals voted for Trump, but 67 percent of evangelicals of color supported Hillary Clinton. Now, these are people who believed the exact same thing, whose only real difference is that... is the color of their skin. So let’s not ignore the fact that there is a racial element to this support.

Jim Wallace, the head of the Sojourners, a liberal evangelical group, said it best when he said that these white evangelicals “acted more white than they did evangelical.” And I think he’s right. The second reason I think has to do with the pernicious influence of something called the prosperity gospel, which has gripped the imaginations of white evangelicals. This is that version of Christianity preached by these charlatans like Joel Olstein and T.D. Jakes, the essential gist of which is that God wants you to drive a Bentley, that what Jesus really wants for you is material prosperity—and indeed that’s how you know God has blessed you, is by your material prosperity.

Many white evangelicals looked at Donald Trump, and what they saw was a wealthy man. And that wealth, as far as they were concerned, was just a sign of God’s blessings. And so that freed Trump from having to do what every other candidate, certainly every other Republican candidate for president has had to do, and that is: actually prove his spiritual bonafides. Trump never had to do that. All he had to do was just keep talking about how rich he was. And for a large swathe of white evangelicals, that was enough.

Thirdly, Donald Trump did something that no other president, not even any Republican president courting the evangelical vote ever did. He expressly promised secular power to these white evangelical groups. In his speeches to them and in the conferences that he had, both private and public, he very clearly and very explicitly said that if they voted for him that he would give them “their power back,” even if he didn’t agree with their pet causes that he would just allow them to have those causes.

And you can see as president he’s talking now about removing, for instance, the Johnson Amendment, which is an amendment that prohibits preachers and churches from actually engaging directly in politics and preaching politics from the pulpit. It’s why they get to keep their tax break. No one has ever thought about removing this requirement until Donald Trump. And now he is very seriously moving towards allowing churches to take part directly in political activism as churches.

But none of this, none of this explains the most important phenomenon about white evangelicals in America, and that is this: In the span of a single election cycle, white evangelicals have gone from being the group in America that is most likely to say that a politician’s morality matters to the group that is now least likely to say that. Atheists in America think that a politician’s morality matters more than white evangelicals in America do—white evangelicals who continue to refer to themselves as value voters.

This is a phenomenon that can’t be explained by just looking at the prosperity gospel or looking at racial matters. What you’re seeing is a gigantic group of Americans who are fundamentally overtur...

More Articles

View All
Ancient Rome 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] The story of ancient Rome is a story of evolution, of how a civilization’s ability to adapt and dominate can lead to its survival for over 1,000 years. Rome began as a small village on central Italy’s Tiber River. In the coming centuries, it gr…
Answering Google's Most Asked Questions of 2022
For most of Google’s relatively short existence, we’ve searched small, silly, insignificant questions - things like how to tell if a papaya is ripe. The color is almost fully yellow, and the feeling is slightly soft. Don’t forget to scoop out the seeds! S…
What Will We Miss?
Hey, Vsauce. Michael here. And the year 6009 will be the very first year since 1961 that a year, when written in Hindu-Arabic numerals, can be inverted and still look the same. But you and I probably won’t live long enough to enjoy the year six thousand a…
Contour plots | Multivariable calculus | Khan Academy
So I have here a three-dimensional graph, um, and that means that it’s representing some kind of function that has a two-dimensional input and a one-dimensional output. So that might look something like f(x, y) = and then just some expression that has a b…
Fundraising Panel at Female Founders Conference 2016
All right, I’m excited to have all four of you here. So I’d love for you to each introduce yourselves. If you could introduce yourself and your company and what it does, what batch you went through YC, and you know how much money you’ve raised or the stag…
Approximating asymptotic limit from table
Function f is defined over the real numbers. This table gives a few values of f. So when x is equal to -4.1, f of x is 5. f of -4.01 is 55. They give us a bunch of values for different x’s of what f of x would be. What is a reasonable estimate for the li…