yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Using similarity to estimate ratio between side lengths | High school geometry | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

So we've been given some information about these three triangles here, and then they say use one of the triangles.

So use one of these three triangles to approximate the ratio. The ratio is the length of segment PN divided by the length of segment MN.

So they want us to figure out the ratio PN over MN. So pause this video and see if you can figure this out.

All right, now let's work through this together. Now given that they want us to figure out this ratio and they want us to actually evaluate it or be able to approximate it, we are probably dealing with similarity.

What I would want to look for is, are one of these triangles similar to the triangle we have here? We're dealing with similar triangles if we have two angles in common.

Because if we have two angles in common then that means that we definitely have the third angle as well, because the third angle is completely determined by what the other two angles are.

So we have a 35-degree angle here and we have a 90-degree angle here. Of all of these choices, this doesn't have a 35-degree angle; it has a 90.

This doesn't have a 35; it has a 90. But triangle 2 here has a 35-degree angle, has a 90-degree angle, and has a 55-degree angle.

If you did the math knowing that 35 plus 90 plus this have to add up to 180 degrees, you would see that this 2 has a measure of 55 degrees.

Given that all of our angle measures are the same between triangle PNM and triangle number two right over here, we know that these two are similar triangles.

The ratios between corresponding sides are going to be the same. We could either take the ratio across triangles, or we could say the ratio within when we just look at one triangle.

If you look at PN over MN, let me try to color code it. So PN right over here corresponds to the side that's opposite the 35-degree angle.

That would correspond to this side right over here on triangle 2. Then MN, that's this that I'm coloring in this bluish color—not so well. I've probably spent more time coloring.

That's opposite the 55-degree angle, and so opposite the 55-degree angle would be right over there.

Now since these triangles are similar, the ratio of the red side over the length of the red side over the length of the blue side is going to be the same in either triangle.

So PN, let me write it this way, say the length of segment PN over this length of segment MN is going to be equivalent to 5.7 over 8.2.

Because this ratio is going to be the same for the corresponding sides regardless of which triangle you look at.

So if you take the side that's opposite 35 degrees, that's 5.7 over 8.2. Now to be very clear, it doesn't mean that somehow the length of this side is 5.7 or that the length of this side is 8.2.

We would only be able to make that conclusion if they were congruent. But with similarity, we know that the ratios—if we look at the ratio of the red side to the blue side on each of those triangles—that would be the same.

This gives us that ratio.

Let's see, 5.7 over 8.2. Which of these choices gets close to that? Well, we could say that this is roughly—if I am approximating it—let's see, it's going to be larger than 0.57 because 8.2 is less than 10, and so we are going to rule this choice out.

5.7 is less than 8.2, so it can't be over one. We have to think between these two choices.

Well, the simplest thing I can do is actually just try to start dividing it by hand. So 8.2 goes into 5.7 the same number of times as 82 goes into 57.

I would add some decimals here so it doesn't go into 57, but how many times does 82 go into 570? I would assume it's about six times, maybe seven times.

Looks like so 7 times 2 is 14, and then 7 times 8 is 56 because it's 57.

So it's actually a little less than 0.7; this got made me go a little bit too high. If I am approximating, it's going to be 0.6 something.

So I like choice B right over there.

More Articles

View All
Resurrecting Notre-Dame de Paris | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
[Music] I took a taxi there, and it was still dark when I got there. It’s kind of like entering a space station or something. You show up, shed all your clothes, put it in lockers, go through this vestibule, and you come out on the other side wearing a cl…
What is Beautiful Deleveraging?
A number of people asked me, “What is a beautiful deleveraging?” Well, first let me start with what is the deleveraging. Sometimes there’s too much debt burden, which also means that somebody’s holding too many debt assets and they’re not going to get pai…
RC step response 3 of 3 example
In the last video, we worked out the step response of an RC circuit, and now we’re going to look at a real example. So, this is our answer. This is the step response, the total response to our circuit to a step input. What does this look like? So, I’m go…
Responding to a Capsized Boat with the U.S. Coast Guard - Smarter Every Day 277
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day! Today, on Smarter Every Day, we’re going to continue our deep dive with the US Coast Guard, and we’re going to see how they accomplish their mission of saving people in peril and protecting the nati…
The 5 Forces Impacting the World Order
Your analysis of economic historical events is based on five forces, and I’d really like to start this conversation by getting you to just quickly summarize those five forces. Okay, uh, just to give you a little bit of background, I um, I’m a global macr…
Geometric constructions: perpendicular line through a point off the line | Geometry | Khan Academy
What I have here is a line, and I have a point that is not on that line. My goal is to draw a new line that goes through this point and is perpendicular to my original line. How do I do that? Well, you might imagine that our compass will come in handy; i…