yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Is the weather actually becoming more extreme? - R. Saravanan


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

From 2016 to 2019, meteorologists saw record-breaking heat waves around the globe, rampant wildfires in California and Australia, and the longest run of category 5 tropical cyclones on record. The number of extreme weather events has been increasing for the last 40 years, and current predictions suggest that trend will continue.

But are these natural disasters simply bad weather? Or are they due to our changing climate? To answer this question, we need to understand the differences between weather and climate—what they are, how we predict them, and what those predictions can tell us.

Meteorologists define weather as the conditions of the atmosphere at a particular time and place. Currently, researchers can predict a region’s weather for the next week with roughly 80% accuracy. Climate describes a region’s average atmospheric conditions over periods of a month or more. Climate predictions can forecast average temperatures for decades to come, but they can’t tell us what specific weather events to expect.

These two types of predictions give us such different information because they’re based on different data. To forecast weather, meteorologists need to measure the atmosphere’s initial conditions. These are the current levels of precipitation, air pressure, humidity, wind speed, and wind direction that determine a region’s weather. Twice every day, meteorologists from over 800 stations around the globe release balloons into the atmosphere.

These balloons carry instruments called radiosondes, which measure initial conditions and transmit their findings to international weather centers. Meteorologists then run the data through predictive physics models that generate the final weather forecast. Unfortunately, there’s something stopping this global web of data from producing a perfect prediction: weather is a fundamentally chaotic system.

This means it’s incredibly sensitive and impossible to perfectly forecast without absolute knowledge of all the system’s elements. In a period of just ten days, even incredibly small disturbances can massively impact atmospheric conditions—making it impossible to reliably predict weather beyond two weeks. Climate prediction, on the other hand, is far less turbulent.

This is partly because a region’s climate is, by definition, the average of all its weather data. But also because climate forecasts ignore what’s currently happening in the atmosphere and focus on the range of what could happen. These parameters are known as boundary conditions, and as their name suggests, they act as constraints on climate and weather.

One example of a boundary condition is solar radiation. By analyzing the precise distance and angle between a location and the sun, we can determine the amount of heat that area will receive. And since we know how the sun behaves throughout the year, we can accurately predict its effects on temperature. Averaged across years of data, this reveals periodic patterns, including seasons.

Most boundary conditions have well-defined values that change slowly, if at all. This allows researchers to reliably predict climate years into the future. But here’s where it gets tricky. Even the slightest change in these boundary conditions represents a much larger shift for the chaotic weather system.

For example, Earth’s surface temperature has warmed by almost 1 degree Celsius over the last 150 years. This might seem like a minor shift, but this 1-degree change has added the energy equivalent of roughly one million nuclear warheads into the atmosphere. This massive surge of energy has already led to a dramatic increase in the number of heatwaves, droughts, and storm surges.

So, is the increase in extreme weather due to random chance, or changing climate? The answer is that—while weather will always be a chaotic system—shifts in our climate do increase the likelihood of extreme weather events. Scientists are in near universal agreement that our climate is changing and that human activity is accelerating those changes.

But fortunately, we can identify what human behaviors are impacting the climate most by tracking which boundary conditions are shifting. So even though next month’s weather might always be a mystery, we can work together to protect the climate for centuries to come.

More Articles

View All
Comic-Con WRAP UP: From The Wackygamer Podcast!
We’re here to talk about Comic-Con. What to Comic-Con? Me a lot fun! We wanted to tell you what our favorites, and this favorites, this did spray. I think this favorites is a word, we’re gonna stick with it. Alright, I think my number one favorite—what w…
Worked example: Analyzing the purity of a mixture | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We’re told you have a solid that you know is mostly sodium chloride. You suspect that it might have, or it may have, some sodium iodide, potassium chloride, or lithium chloride as well. When you analyze a sample, you see that it contains 73% chlorine by m…
Integral of product of cosines
We’ve been doing several videos now to establish a bunch of truths of definite integrals of various combinations of trigonometric functions so that we will have a really strong mathematical basis for actually finding the Fourier coefficients. I think we o…
Apple CEO Tim Cook on what it takes to run the world's largest company | Dua Lipa: At Your Service
[Music] Tim, thank you! It’s so great to be here. It’s so great to have you here, honestly. It’s amazing to have you here at home on my sofa, and I love it. It’s beautiful. Thank you. I—I have to say, like, before this interview, I went on the internet t…
Quantity theory of money | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about the quantity theory of money, which is based on what is known as the equation of exchange. It tries to relate the money supply ( M ) (so this is some measure of the money supply) with the real GDP ( Y ) (so that is…
There's no such thing as Universally Preferable Behaviour
Universally preferable behavior is the name of Stefan Malan’s book arguing for an objective non-religious foundation for morality. Uh, I’ll begin by saying I don’t believe that anything that could fairly be called objective morality exists. Uh, so catego…