yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Coupled reactions | Applications of thermodynamics | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy


5m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Coupled reactions use a thermodynamically favorable reaction to drive a thermodynamically unfavorable reaction. For example, let's look at a hypothetical reaction where reactants A and B combine to form products C and I. The standard change in free energy for this reaction, ΔG naught, let's say is greater than zero. When ΔG naught is greater than zero, that's a thermodynamically unfavorable reaction, and at equilibrium, the equilibrium constant K is less than one. When K is less than one, that means there are more reactants than products at equilibrium. If our goal is to make a lot of the product C, that won't happen as long as this reaction is thermodynamically unfavorable.

Next, let's look at another hypothetical reaction where I reacts with D to form E and F as the products. For this hypothetical reaction, the standard change in free energy, ΔG naught, is much less than zero. Since ΔG naught for this second hypothetical reaction is less than zero, reaction two is thermodynamically favorable, and at equilibrium, the equilibrium constant K is much greater than one. If K is much greater than one, then we can assume that the second reaction essentially goes to completion. So all the I and the D will react together to form E and F, and at equilibrium, there are way more products than there are reactants.

Remember that our goal was to make a lot of the product C, but we can't get that by just running the first reaction by itself. However, by coupling the first reaction, which is thermodynamically unfavorable, to the second reaction, which is thermodynamically favorable, we can make a significant amount of product C. These two hypothetical reactions can be coupled together because they share a common intermediate, I. Even though reaction one is thermodynamically unfavorable, even if it forms only a small amount of I, since reaction two is thermodynamically favorable, the I from reaction one will be used up in reaction two to form the products for reaction two.

Removing the product I causes the equilibrium to shift to the right in the first reaction, therefore producing more of our desired product C. So the thermodynamically favorable reaction is driving the thermodynamically unfavorable reaction to the right. Since we are coupling these two reactions together, if we add reaction one to reaction two, the intermediate would cancel out. For the reactants, we would get A plus B plus D, and for the products, we would get C plus E plus F. To find ΔG naught for this overall equation, we would need to add together ΔG naught for reaction one and ΔG naught for reaction two.

So ΔG naught for this overall equation would be less than zero, which tells us this overall equation is thermodynamically favorable, and the equilibrium constant is greater than one, which means at equilibrium we'll have a decent amount of our desired product C. Next, let's look at a practical example of coupled reactions. Let's say that our goal is to extract solid copper from copper(I) sulfide. The other product of this reaction is sulfur; however, ΔG naught for this reaction is equal to positive 86.1 kilojoules per mole of reaction. Since ΔG naught is positive, this reaction is thermodynamically unfavorable, and at equilibrium, there'd be very little of our product, so we wouldn't get very much copper.

The solution is to couple this first reaction to a thermodynamically favorable reaction, and that's the conversion of sulfur into sulfur dioxide. So solid sulfur plus oxygen gas gives sulfur dioxide, and ΔG naught for this reaction is equal to negative 300.4 kilojoules per mole of reaction. So, adding our two reactions together, the common intermediate sulfur cancels out, and that gives us copper(I) sulfide plus oxygen for the reactants goes to solid copper and sulfur dioxide for the products. If we add the two ΔG naught values together, positive 86.1 plus negative 300.4 gives a ΔG naught for this overall equation equal to negative 214.3 kilojoules per mole of reaction. Since ΔG naught is negative, now this overall reaction is thermodynamically favorable, with an equilibrium constant greater than one; therefore, we will now produce a lot of copper.

So, burning copper(I) sulfide in air gives us a feasible way of extracting copper from copper(I) sulfide. Coupled reactions are also very important in biochemistry. For example, two amino acids are alanine and glycine, and if these two amino acids come together, they form what's called a dipeptide. It's very important for the body to be able to make dipeptides because if we were to add on some more amino acids, we would form what's called a polypeptide, which eventually leads to the formation of a protein. However, the formation of dipeptides is thermodynamically unfavorable; therefore, the body needs a way of making this reaction thermodynamically favorable so the body can make proteins.

To do this, the body uses ATP, which stands for adenosine triphosphate, and here is the dot structure for ATP in the ionized form. ATP is often called a high-energy compound, and the hydrolysis of ATP is used to drive protein synthesis. Next, let's look at the equation showing the hydrolysis of ATP to ADP, which is adenosine diphosphate, and inorganic phosphate. The standard change in free energy for the hydrolysis of ATP is equal to negative 31 kilojoules per mole of reaction. Since ΔG naught is negative, the hydrolysis of ATP is thermodynamically favorable.

Alanine and glycine combine to form the dipeptide; alone, glycine and water, ΔG naught for the formation of this dipeptide is equal to positive 29 kilojoules per mole of reaction. Since ΔG naught is positive, this reaction is thermodynamically unfavorable. With the help of an enzyme, the unfavorable reaction is coupled to the favorable reaction, and if we add the two reactions together, water would cancel out and give us alanine plus glycine plus ATP for the reactants and alkanyl glycine and ADP and inorganic phosphate for the products. Adding the two values of ΔG naught together, we get ΔG naught is equal to negative 2 kilojoules per mole of reaction, and since ΔG naught is negative, it's now favorable for the body to synthesize this dipeptide.

More Articles

View All
What Is the 'Gray Zone' Border Between the U.S. and Canada? | National Geographic
The United States and Canada share the longest undefended border in the world. Most of the time, it’s as peaceful as it sounds, but not always. Since the 1700s, a tiny turf war has been smoldering between the two countries. The grand prize: an uninhabited…
Journey Through the Largest Cave in the World | Expedition Raw
We started our two-day journey through the jungle toward the world’s largest cave. We’re here to photograph this cave in 360-degree images. You know we have to descend into vast empty darkness. I have a cold sensation along my spine, feeling like, how on …
Subterranean Treasure | Primal Survivor
These environments can look dry and barren, but they can be useful in a survival situation if you know how to read the landscape. This solid granite gorge has been carved out by water, and just look at the walls; they’ve been smoothed and polished by mill…
Conditions for a z test about a proportion | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
[Instructor] Jules works on a small team of 40 employees. Each employee receives an annual rating, the best of which is exceeds expectations. Management claimed that 10% of employees earn this rating, but Jules suspected it was actually less common. She o…
The Past and Future of YC Bio
Uh, all right, so now Serbia and I are going to talk a bit about the past and future of YC bio. We have a clicker. Cool, look at that! So, those of you who’ve had me as their group partner know that I like to cut to the chase and talk about the elephant i…
Warren Buffett: How to Generate 50% Returns with Small Amounts of Money (Recent Interview)
To could earn 50% a year the answer would be, in my particular case, it would be: everything you have ever learned about money is wrong, and you’re about to find out why. In this video, you see there is an old saying that it takes money to make money, me…