yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Kirchhoff's current law | Circuit analysis | Electrical engineering | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Up to now, we've talked about, uh, resistors, capacitors, and other components, and we've connected them up and learned about OHS law for resistors. We also learned some things about series resistors, like we show here the idea of Kirchhoff's laws. These are basically common sense laws that we can derive from looking at simple circuits.

In this video, we're going to work out Kirchhoff's current law. Let's take a look at these series resistors here. There's a connection point right there, and that's called a node, a junction. One of the things we know is that when we put current through this—let's say we put a current through here—and we know that current is flowing charge. So, we know that the charge does not collect anywhere. That means it comes out of this resistor and flows into the node, and then goes across, and it comes out on this side.

All the current that comes in comes out. That's something we know. That's the conservation of charge, and we know that the charge does not pile up anywhere. We'll call this current I1, and we'll call this current I2. We know we can just write right away that I1 equals I2. That seems pretty clear from our argument about charge.

Now, let me add something else here. We'll add another resistor to our node like that, and now there's going to be some current going this way. Let's call that I3. Now, this doesn’t work anymore; I1 and I2 are not necessarily the same. But what we do know is any current that goes in has to come out of this node. So, we can say that I1 equals I2 plus I3. That seems pretty reasonable.

In general, what we have here is if we take all the current flowing in, it equals all the current flowing out. That's Kirchhoff's current law. That's one way to say it, and in mathematical notation, we would say: I in (the summation of currents going in) equals the summation sign (the summation of I out). That's one expression of Kirchhoff's current law.

So now, I want to generalize this a little bit. Let's say we have a node, and we have some wires going into it. Here are some wires connected up to a node, and there's current going into each one. I'm going to define the current arrows. This looks a little odd, but it's okay to do, all going in. What Kirchhoff's current law says is that the sum of the currents going into that node has to be equal to zero.

Let's work out how that works. Let's say this is 1 amp, and this is 1 amp, and this is 1 amp. The question is, what is this one? What's that current there? If I use my Kirchhoff's current law expressed this way, it says that 1 + 1 + 1 + I (whatever this I here) has to equal zero. What that says is that I equals -3. So that says -3 amps flowing in is the same exact thing as +3 amps flowing out.

One amp, one amp, one amp comes in, and 3 amps flow out. Another way we could do it, equally valid—this is just three ways to say exactly the same thing. I have a bunch of wires going to a junction like this, and this time I define the currents going out. Let's say I define them all going out, and the same thing works. The sum of the currents this time going out—I'll go back over here, and I'll write in all the currents going in—has to equal zero as well.

You can do the same exercise. If I make all these 1 amp and ask what is this one here? What is I, here, the outgoing current? It's 1 + 1 + 1 + 1. Those are the four that I know, and those are the ones going out. So, what's the last one going out? It has to equal zero. The last one has to be -4 to equal zero, so this is a current of -4 amps.

So that's the idea of Kirchhoff's current law. It's basically we reason through it from first principles because everything that comes in has to leave by some route. And when we talked about it that way, we ended up with this expression for Kirchhoff's current law. We can come up with a slightly smaller mathematical expression if we say, let's define all the currents to be pointing in. Some of them may turn out to be negative, but then that's another way to write Kirchhoff's current law.

In the same way, if we define all the currents going out, you actually have your choice of any of these three anytime you want to use these. If we define them all going out, this is Kirchhoff's current law, and we'll use this all the time when we do circuit analysis.

More Articles

View All
McCulloch v. Maryland | Foundations of American democracy | US government and civics | Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases that has helped determine the balance of power between the federal government and the states, and that’s McCulloch versus Maryland. So the year is 1816. After the…
This Virus Shouldn't Exist (But it Does)
Hidden in the microverse all around you, there’s a merciless war being fought by the true rulers of this planet: microorganisms. Amoeba, protists, bacteria, archaea, and fungi compete for resources and space. And then there are the strange horrors that ar…
Take Accountability to Earn Equity
Accountability is important because that’s how you’re going to get leverage. That’s how you’re going to get credibility. It’s also how you’re going to get equity. You’re gonna get a piece of the business when you’re negotiating with other people. Ultimat…
Back to Camp | Life Below Zero
Sue Aikens has spent the past four months in Fairbanks recovering from surgery. As Kavik River Camp’s sole proprietor, her absence has left this site uninhabited and unprotected. “I have to visually check everything, behind any corner, any trailer. It’s …
Rulings on majority and minority rights by the Supreme Court | Khan Academy
We’ve already talked about the 14th Amendment in previous videos, but just as a reminder, Section 1 of the 14th Amendment says, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United Stat…
One, Two, Three Bites, You’re Out | Wicked Tuna: Outer Banks
Michael: “Let that one go, all right? Got a double on, baby! What do you want me to do with this one?” TJ: “Let him go! Just cranking up. Keep it tight on them! Get tight on him!” F: “Watch out! What we’re here for, baby! Got a double on here. I think h…