yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Change in centripetal acceleration from change in linear velocity and radius: Worked examples


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We are told that a van drives around a circular curve of radius r with linear speed v. On a second curve of the same radius, the van has linear speed one third v. You could view linear speed as the magnitude of your linear velocity.

How does the magnitude of the van's centripetal acceleration change after the linear speed decreases? So pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own. I'll give you a little bit of a hint: we know that the magnitude of centripetal acceleration, in general, is equal to linear speed squared divided by radius, the radius of the curve.

All right, now let's work through this together. So let's first think about the first curve. The magnitude of our centripetal acceleration for curve one (I have another subscript one here, of course, this is around the first curve) tells us that our linear speed is v. So we're gonna have v squared over the radius of that curve, which is r. So, it's just going to be straight up v squared over r for that first curve: the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration.

Now, what about the second curve? The magnitude of our centripetal acceleration around the second curve (that's what that 2 is) is going to be equal to... They tell us we now have a linear speed of one third v. So, in our numerator, we're going to square that one third v: (1/3 v)², all of that over the curve of the same radius.

Our radius is still r, and so let's just do a little algebraic simplification: one third v times one third v is just going to be one ninth v squared. So it's going to be one ninth v squared over r. All I did is square this numerator here, or I could write this as one ninth times v squared over r.

The reason why I wrote this in green is because this is the exact same thing as this, and so this is going to be equal to... This is equal to one ninth times, instead of writing v squared over r, I can say, "Hey, that's our centripetal acceleration, the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration around the first curve."

So, how does the magnitude of the van's centripetal acceleration change after the linear speed decreases? Well, around the second curve, we have one ninth the magnitude of centripetal acceleration. So we could say the magnitude (mag) or I could just say, well, they already asked us how does the magnitude change. So we could say decreases, decreases by a factor of 9.

And I wrote it in this language: you could say it got multiplied by a factor of one ninth, or you could say decreases by a factor of 9 because on the Khan Academy exercises that deal with this, they use language like that.

Let's do another example here. We're told a father spends his daughter in a circle of radius r at angular speed omega. Then the father extends his arms and spins her in a circle of radius 2r with the same angular speed.

How does the magnitude of the child's centripetal acceleration change when the father extends his arms? Once again, pause this video and see if you can figure it out. Well, the key realization here, and we derived this in a previous video, is to realize that the magnitude of centripetal acceleration is equal to r times our angular speed squared.

So initially, the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration (I'll do that with a sub i) is going to be equal to... Well, they're using the same notation; we have omega as our angular speed and our radius is r. So it's just going to be r omega squared.

Then, when we think about the father extending his arms, we can say the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration (I could say final or extended, well, I'll just say final, sub f) what is that going to be equal to? Well, now our radius, the radius of our circle, is 2r. So it's going to be 2r, and they say the same angular speed. So our angular speed is still omega: 2r omega squared.

Well, this part right over here, r omega squared, was just the magnitude of our initial centripetal acceleration. That was the magnitude of our initial centripetal acceleration.

And so you see that our the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration has increased by a factor of two: increased, increased by a factor of two. And we're done.

More Articles

View All
Shower Thoughts That Make Me Question Everything
I promise it hasn’t been eight months since I last had a shower. This year has just flown by so quickly that I didn’t get time to gather my thoughts. My shower thoughts: dreams are confusing. Some people believe that they can tell the future; others feel …
Once You Get Money Upgrade These 15 Things Immediately
They lied to you. They told you to get the fast car, the diamond chain, the mansion. But deep down, you know those are just marketing campaigns to separate you from your hard-earned money. Do that, and you’ll be back to being broke in no time. But there a…
Dividing quadratics by linear expressions with remainders | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
So if you’ve been watching these videos, you know that we have a lot of scenarios where people seem to be walking up to us on the street and asking us to do math problems, and I guess this will be no different. So let’s say someone walks up to you on the…
Sold My Tesla Stock
What’s a Pilon? It’s Musk here. So, I don’t usually make these kinds of videos, but given the recent and unprecedented price surge of Tesla stock over these last few days, I felt like this would be worth addressing. We could talk about exactly what’s goin…
Polynomial special products: difference of squares | Algebra 2 | Khan Academy
Earlier in our mathematical adventures, we had expanded things like ( x + y \times x - y ). Just as a bit of review, this is going to be equal to ( x \times x ), which is ( x^2 ), plus ( x \times \text{negative } y ), which is negative ( xy ), plus ( y \t…
A Small Light | In Production Piece | National Geographic
Man: –take one. Director: Ready? And, action. Susanna Fogel: People tend to think that they know history, especially with very famous stories like Anne Frank’s story. But with Miep, you’re coming at it from a sideways angle that forces you to see it from…