yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Change in centripetal acceleration from change in linear velocity and radius: Worked examples


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We are told that a van drives around a circular curve of radius r with linear speed v. On a second curve of the same radius, the van has linear speed one third v. You could view linear speed as the magnitude of your linear velocity.

How does the magnitude of the van's centripetal acceleration change after the linear speed decreases? So pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own. I'll give you a little bit of a hint: we know that the magnitude of centripetal acceleration, in general, is equal to linear speed squared divided by radius, the radius of the curve.

All right, now let's work through this together. So let's first think about the first curve. The magnitude of our centripetal acceleration for curve one (I have another subscript one here, of course, this is around the first curve) tells us that our linear speed is v. So we're gonna have v squared over the radius of that curve, which is r. So, it's just going to be straight up v squared over r for that first curve: the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration.

Now, what about the second curve? The magnitude of our centripetal acceleration around the second curve (that's what that 2 is) is going to be equal to... They tell us we now have a linear speed of one third v. So, in our numerator, we're going to square that one third v: (1/3 v)², all of that over the curve of the same radius.

Our radius is still r, and so let's just do a little algebraic simplification: one third v times one third v is just going to be one ninth v squared. So it's going to be one ninth v squared over r. All I did is square this numerator here, or I could write this as one ninth times v squared over r.

The reason why I wrote this in green is because this is the exact same thing as this, and so this is going to be equal to... This is equal to one ninth times, instead of writing v squared over r, I can say, "Hey, that's our centripetal acceleration, the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration around the first curve."

So, how does the magnitude of the van's centripetal acceleration change after the linear speed decreases? Well, around the second curve, we have one ninth the magnitude of centripetal acceleration. So we could say the magnitude (mag) or I could just say, well, they already asked us how does the magnitude change. So we could say decreases, decreases by a factor of 9.

And I wrote it in this language: you could say it got multiplied by a factor of one ninth, or you could say decreases by a factor of 9 because on the Khan Academy exercises that deal with this, they use language like that.

Let's do another example here. We're told a father spends his daughter in a circle of radius r at angular speed omega. Then the father extends his arms and spins her in a circle of radius 2r with the same angular speed.

How does the magnitude of the child's centripetal acceleration change when the father extends his arms? Once again, pause this video and see if you can figure it out. Well, the key realization here, and we derived this in a previous video, is to realize that the magnitude of centripetal acceleration is equal to r times our angular speed squared.

So initially, the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration (I'll do that with a sub i) is going to be equal to... Well, they're using the same notation; we have omega as our angular speed and our radius is r. So it's just going to be r omega squared.

Then, when we think about the father extending his arms, we can say the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration (I could say final or extended, well, I'll just say final, sub f) what is that going to be equal to? Well, now our radius, the radius of our circle, is 2r. So it's going to be 2r, and they say the same angular speed. So our angular speed is still omega: 2r omega squared.

Well, this part right over here, r omega squared, was just the magnitude of our initial centripetal acceleration. That was the magnitude of our initial centripetal acceleration.

And so you see that our the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration has increased by a factor of two: increased, increased by a factor of two. And we're done.

More Articles

View All
Celebrate 10 years of Khan Academy! 🎂
Hello teachers, Sal here from the not-for-profit Khan Academy, and I just wanted to thank you for all of your partnership over the last 10 years. All of us here at Khan Academy—it’s much more than me now. We’re over 200 folks, including researchers, teac…
Words Are the Most Powerful Drug | Origins: The Journey of Humankind
Humans stand alone in the animal kingdom. Our power over nature is unparalleled. What separates us? What is it that makes us human? The answer lies in our mastery of communication: the power to express complex thoughts and ideas; to organize and think col…
Jim Steyer on safely keeping children connected & engaged during school closures | Homeroom with Sal
Hi everyone! Sal Khan here. Welcome to the Daily Homeroom. Uh, for those of y’all who don’t know what this is, you’re just showing up off of Facebook or YouTube. This is something that we started once we started seeing math school closures, and it’s reall…
Adding the opposite with number lines | 7th grade | Khan Academy
So, this number line diagram here, it looks like I’m adding or subtracting two numbers. I’m starting with what looks like a positive nine. I’m starting at 0 and going nine units to the right, so that’s a positive nine. To that, it looks like I might be a…
See Why the Mysterious Mountain Lion Is the ‘Bigfoot’ of Big Cats | Short Film Showcase
Nobody knows anything about Al’s going on with my lights out here. They don’t. My own lines are out here, and that’s all people know. They are so mysterious. People don’t see them; they’re like little cat yetis. Okay, take away that cat Yeti thing. Brill…
The Murder of Carmine Galante | Narco Wars
1978, Carmine Galante goes back to prison for violating parole. They should have held him there, clearly, because he was consorting with criminal associates, violating parole. But Roy Cohn got him out of prison in record time. So he got let out early ‘79…