yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Change in centripetal acceleration from change in linear velocity and radius: Worked examples


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We are told that a van drives around a circular curve of radius r with linear speed v. On a second curve of the same radius, the van has linear speed one third v. You could view linear speed as the magnitude of your linear velocity.

How does the magnitude of the van's centripetal acceleration change after the linear speed decreases? So pause this video and see if you can figure it out on your own. I'll give you a little bit of a hint: we know that the magnitude of centripetal acceleration, in general, is equal to linear speed squared divided by radius, the radius of the curve.

All right, now let's work through this together. So let's first think about the first curve. The magnitude of our centripetal acceleration for curve one (I have another subscript one here, of course, this is around the first curve) tells us that our linear speed is v. So we're gonna have v squared over the radius of that curve, which is r. So, it's just going to be straight up v squared over r for that first curve: the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration.

Now, what about the second curve? The magnitude of our centripetal acceleration around the second curve (that's what that 2 is) is going to be equal to... They tell us we now have a linear speed of one third v. So, in our numerator, we're going to square that one third v: (1/3 v)², all of that over the curve of the same radius.

Our radius is still r, and so let's just do a little algebraic simplification: one third v times one third v is just going to be one ninth v squared. So it's going to be one ninth v squared over r. All I did is square this numerator here, or I could write this as one ninth times v squared over r.

The reason why I wrote this in green is because this is the exact same thing as this, and so this is going to be equal to... This is equal to one ninth times, instead of writing v squared over r, I can say, "Hey, that's our centripetal acceleration, the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration around the first curve."

So, how does the magnitude of the van's centripetal acceleration change after the linear speed decreases? Well, around the second curve, we have one ninth the magnitude of centripetal acceleration. So we could say the magnitude (mag) or I could just say, well, they already asked us how does the magnitude change. So we could say decreases, decreases by a factor of 9.

And I wrote it in this language: you could say it got multiplied by a factor of one ninth, or you could say decreases by a factor of 9 because on the Khan Academy exercises that deal with this, they use language like that.

Let's do another example here. We're told a father spends his daughter in a circle of radius r at angular speed omega. Then the father extends his arms and spins her in a circle of radius 2r with the same angular speed.

How does the magnitude of the child's centripetal acceleration change when the father extends his arms? Once again, pause this video and see if you can figure it out. Well, the key realization here, and we derived this in a previous video, is to realize that the magnitude of centripetal acceleration is equal to r times our angular speed squared.

So initially, the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration (I'll do that with a sub i) is going to be equal to... Well, they're using the same notation; we have omega as our angular speed and our radius is r. So it's just going to be r omega squared.

Then, when we think about the father extending his arms, we can say the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration (I could say final or extended, well, I'll just say final, sub f) what is that going to be equal to? Well, now our radius, the radius of our circle, is 2r. So it's going to be 2r, and they say the same angular speed. So our angular speed is still omega: 2r omega squared.

Well, this part right over here, r omega squared, was just the magnitude of our initial centripetal acceleration. That was the magnitude of our initial centripetal acceleration.

And so you see that our the magnitude of our centripetal acceleration has increased by a factor of two: increased, increased by a factor of two. And we're done.

More Articles

View All
15 Secrets Only Billionaires Know
As of 2023, there are 3,112 billionaires in the world. The billionaire perspective on life is quite different from anything you’ve ever experienced, and it’ll definitely go against many of the things you believe. Here are 15 secrets only billionaires know…
A Napa Valley Nature Walk | National Geographic
Hi! I’m Ashley Kalina, and I’m here in beautiful Napa Valley to talk to you about National Get Outdoors Day. I’m here with National Geographic and our friends at Nature Valley. We’re here to experience the beautiful outdoors. Now, I’m not the expert here…
Portraits of Afghanistan Before the Fall | Podcast | Overheard at National Geographic
[Music] 20 years after the United States went into Afghanistan to pursue Osama bin Laden, U.S. forces have finally withdrawn and the hard-line Islamist Taliban regime has once again seized control of the country. Several months ago, National Geographic se…
2015 AP Calculus BC 2c | AP Calculus BC solved exams | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Part C: Find the time at which the speed of the particle is three. So let’s just remind ourselves what speed is. It’s the magnitude of velocity. If you have the x, actually let me draw it this way. If you have the x dimension of, or the x component of a …
Distance or arc length from angular displacement | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
We’re going to do in this video is try to draw connections between angular displacement and notions of arc length or distance traveled. So, right over here, let’s imagine I have some type of a tennis ball or something, and it is tethered with a rope to s…
Why is the tech industry in the SF Bay Area?
Is there a specific reason, or was there specific events that occurred which has created this strength or grip that the Bay Area has when it comes to technology? I don’t think it is a path dependent history. In other words, I don’t think that Silicon Vall…