yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Earth's place in the universe | Middle school Earth and space science | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Hello everyone! Today we are going to be talking about Earth's place in space.

So, for as long as there have been humans, we've been looking up at the stars and wondering about our place in the universe. Our understanding about this has improved over time, and we have developed models that can help us understand something as vast as space.

Now, models are just a way of representing a system of ideas that help us identify and understand patterns that we see. Models are a tool that can explain and predict what we see in the world and space around us. As we gain new information, we can update our models.

So, what kind of model might we construct about how Earth interacts with other bodies in the universe? To begin with, every day we can see the sun rise in the east and set in the west, and other objects in the sky follow a similar pattern. It was logical then for early models to consider the Earth as a stationary object around which all of the universe revolves.

This is called a geocentric model—geo for Earth and centric for center. This geocentric model was quite good at explaining a lot of the things that we see in the sky, like the apparent motion of the sun and the stars. However, there were issues with this geocentric model.

For example, the motions of other planets in the sky. A planet like Jupiter might sometimes move backwards in the opposite direction, which isn't really very well explained by this geocentric model.

Now, when a model doesn't match our observations like this, we can add new pieces to improve the model. So, astronomers working with the geocentric model did this by adding smaller cycles within the planets' orbits around the Earth. Adding these cycles did help match the geocentric model to the observations, but there were many of these cycles required, and there wasn't a good explanation for why these cycles existed.

Moreover, there wasn't very much reasoning for them, and it made the model very complicated and not particularly useful. Let's pause and talk a little bit about motion, specifically apparent versus actual.

Imagine you're sitting in a car and driving through a forest. To your perspective, as you look out the window, the trees seem to be whizzing by. But trees, of course, are rooted to the ground; it's actually you that are moving relative to the surface of the Earth. This is the difference between apparent and actual motion.

So, back to our geocentric model. Another way to explain some of the issues with a model like the geocentric model, besides adding ever more complicated features to it, is to, in fact, just come up with a new model. This is what astronomers did.

The new model that was proposed to replace the geocentric model was the heliocentric model. In this model, the Earth and all the other planets actually revolve around the sun—helio means sun. This heliocentric model didn't need complicated and unexplained cycles to explain the way the other planets moved across the sky; it was an expected outcome of the planets' orbits.

Now, you may be wondering, in this model, the sun is stationary, so why does it seem to be moving across the Earth's sky each day? This is actually also easily explained because the motion of the sun in the sky is not actual motion; it is apparent motion.

Not only is the Earth revolving around the sun—revolving means orbiting—but the Earth is also spinning on its own axis. So, as the surface of the Earth moves with its spinning motion, it makes it appear as if the sun is moving across the sky.

The spinning of the Earth actually explains why celestial objects appear to rise and set over the course of a day, while the revolution or orbit around the sun explains the motion of those objects over the course of a year.

It's important to remember that while the heliocentric model does a better job of explaining and predicting our solar system, which is what we want models to do, it is still a model and not a perfect recreation of reality.

For example, while the heliocentric model considers the sun as stationary, we know now that the sun is actually just one star of many billions orbiting the center of our own galaxy. So, the sun, along with the rest of the solar system, is in fact moving.

To summarize, in this video we talked about how we can use models to help us understand what we see in the sky and Earth's place in space. As we learn more, we improve our models, and we can develop new ones that do a better job of explaining our observations and predicting the world around us, such as the change from a geocentric model to a heliocentric model.

The Earth then is a planet that orbits the sun like the other planets of the solar system, and the sun appears to move across the sky because the Earth spins on its axis. Thanks for watching, and I hope you learned a little bit of something!

More Articles

View All
Why Are 96,000,000 Black Balls on This Reservoir?
(Shade balls rolling) - These are shade balls. They’re being dumped into this water reservoir in Los Angeles. And contrary to what you may have heard, their main purpose is not to reduce evaporation. So what are they really for? To find out, I’m visiting …
How Short Your Life REALLY Is
For the past month or so, I’ve been thinking a lot about life. And when people say that, they usually mean what they want to do in life; whether that be their career or relationships, or entertainment or leisure? But I’ve been thinking differently. Of cou…
Unchaining Captive Elephants in Nepal | National Geographic
I think the most memorable release that I was ever present at is when we put five elephants into a brand new 4-acre Corral. The elephants moved forward by a few feet, all tight together, with the babies underneath them. Then the babies started squealing, …
RC natural response example (3 of 3)
We just derived what the current is and the voltage. These are both the natural response of the RC. Now, what I did is I went ahead and I plotted out this using a computer, just using Excel to plot out what these two expressions look like. Let me show you…
2015 AP Chemistry free response 2c | Thermodynamics | Chemistry | Khan Academy
Because the dehydration reaction is not observed to occur at 298 Kelvin, the student claims that the reaction has an equilibrium constant less than 1.00 at 298 Kelvin. Do the thermodynamic data for the reaction support the student’s claim? Justify your an…
5 FREE Ways to Get Better With Money
Hey guys and welcome back to the channel. Today we’re going to be discussing five awesome tips that will help you get better with money that are completely free. No fluff! I’m not going to tell you to go fill in surveys for 10 hours. I’m going to tell you…