yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Labor and Capital Are Old Leverage


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So why don't we talk a little bit about leverage? The first tweet in the storm was a famous quote from Archimedes, which was: "Give me a lever long enough and a place to stand, and I will move the earth."

The next tweet was: "Fortunes require leverage." Business leverage comes from capital, people, and products with no marginal costs of replication. Leverage is critical. The reason I stuck in Archimedes' quote in there is normally I don't like putting other people's quotes in my Twitter; that doesn't add any value. You can go look up those people's quotes, but this quote I had to put in there because it's just so fundamental. I read it when I was very, very young, and it had a huge impression on me.

We all know what leverage is. When we use a seesaw or a lever, we understand how that works physically. But I think what our brains aren't really well evolved to comprehend is how much leverage is possible in modern society and what the newest forms of leverage are.

The oldest form of leverage is labor, which is people working for you. So instead of me lifting rocks, I can have ten people lift rocks. Then, just by my guidance and where the rock should go, a lot more rocks get moved than I could do myself. Everybody understands this because we're evolved to understand the laborer form of leverage.

What happens is society overvalues labor as a form of leverage. This is why your parents are impressed when you get a promotion and you have lots of people working underneath you. This is why, when a lot of naive people we tell them about your company, they'll say, "How many people work there?" They'll use that as a way to establish credibility. They're trying to measure how much leverage and impact you actually have.

Or when someone starts a movement, they'll say how many people they have or how big the army is. We just automatically assume that more people is better, but I would argue that this is the worst form of leverage that you could possibly use. Managing other people is incredibly messy. It requires tremendous leadership skills.

You're one short hop from a mutiny or getting eaten or torn apart by the mob. It's incredibly competed over. Entire civilizations have been destroyed over this fight. For example, communism and Marxism are all about the battle between capital and labor—Das Kapital, and that's labor, right? So it's kind of a trap. You really want to stay out of labor-based leverage.

You want the minimum amount of people working with you that are going to allow you to use the other forms of leverage, but achar, you're much more interesting. The second type of leverage is capital, and this one's a little less hardwired into us because large amounts of money moving around and being saved and being invested in money markets are inventions of human beings over the last few hundred to few thousand years. They're not evolved with us from hundreds of thousands of years, so we understand them a little bit less well.

They probably require more intelligence to use correctly, and the ways in which we use them keep changing. Management skills from 100 years ago might still apply today, but investing in the stock market skills from 100 years ago probably don't apply to the same level today.

So capital is a trickier form of leverage to use for modern. It's the one that people have used to get fabulously wealthy in the last century. It's probably been the dominant form of leverage in the last century, and you can see this by the richest people. It's bankers, politicians, and corrupt countries who print money, especially people who move large amounts of money around.

If you look at the top of very large companies, outside of technology companies, in many, many large old companies, the CEO job is really a financial job. They're really financial asset managers. Sometimes, asset managing can put a pleasant face on it, so you get a Warren Buffett type, but deep down, I think we all dislike capital as a form of leverage because it feels unfair—it feels unfair because it's this invisible thing that can be accumulated and passed across generations, and suddenly seems to result in people having gargantuan amounts of m...

More Articles

View All
Analyzing Billions of Transactions to Understand Consumer Behavior - Michael Babineau and Kevin Hale
Mike: Kevin was a group partner when you did YC in the summer 2015 batch. What idea did you apply with? Kevin: Our basic idea at the time was really to use credit card data to help investors make better investment decisions. I think one thing that is act…
6 Millionaire Habits That Changed My Life
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So throughout these last few years, I’ve had the opportunity to speak with hundreds of people about their financial situation, learn what sets them apart, and see firsthand how they’re able to grow their wealth from n…
Solving 3-digit addition in your head | 2nd grade | Khan Academy
[Voiceover] What I want to do in this video is go over some techniques for doing mental addition. Now, if I saw something like 355 plus 480, if you have some paper around, you could write these numbers down and do your traditional addition, but you might …
Successful Pitch
These are the three attributes you find in every successful pitch. These are the ones that get a check, that actually start their journey funded on Shark Tank, that go into the ecosphere of Shark Tank, that get followed every year by all the networks, tha…
Commas and introductory elements | Punctuation | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello, grammarians! Uh, Paige and I are here to teach you about introductory elements in sentences and how commas relate to them. Paige, what, how do we—how should we define what an introductory element is? So, it’s pretty much, uh, something that happe…
Personally Identifiable Information (PII) | Internet safety | Khan Academy
Hi everyone, Sal Khan here from Khan Academy. My social security number is eight five seven three two five five six seven. No, it’s not! I wouldn’t tell you my social security number like that, and that’s because it is personally identifiable information,…