yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Labor and Capital Are Old Leverage


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

So why don't we talk a little bit about leverage? The first tweet in the storm was a famous quote from Archimedes, which was: "Give me a lever long enough and a place to stand, and I will move the earth."

The next tweet was: "Fortunes require leverage." Business leverage comes from capital, people, and products with no marginal costs of replication. Leverage is critical. The reason I stuck in Archimedes' quote in there is normally I don't like putting other people's quotes in my Twitter; that doesn't add any value. You can go look up those people's quotes, but this quote I had to put in there because it's just so fundamental. I read it when I was very, very young, and it had a huge impression on me.

We all know what leverage is. When we use a seesaw or a lever, we understand how that works physically. But I think what our brains aren't really well evolved to comprehend is how much leverage is possible in modern society and what the newest forms of leverage are.

The oldest form of leverage is labor, which is people working for you. So instead of me lifting rocks, I can have ten people lift rocks. Then, just by my guidance and where the rock should go, a lot more rocks get moved than I could do myself. Everybody understands this because we're evolved to understand the laborer form of leverage.

What happens is society overvalues labor as a form of leverage. This is why your parents are impressed when you get a promotion and you have lots of people working underneath you. This is why, when a lot of naive people we tell them about your company, they'll say, "How many people work there?" They'll use that as a way to establish credibility. They're trying to measure how much leverage and impact you actually have.

Or when someone starts a movement, they'll say how many people they have or how big the army is. We just automatically assume that more people is better, but I would argue that this is the worst form of leverage that you could possibly use. Managing other people is incredibly messy. It requires tremendous leadership skills.

You're one short hop from a mutiny or getting eaten or torn apart by the mob. It's incredibly competed over. Entire civilizations have been destroyed over this fight. For example, communism and Marxism are all about the battle between capital and labor—Das Kapital, and that's labor, right? So it's kind of a trap. You really want to stay out of labor-based leverage.

You want the minimum amount of people working with you that are going to allow you to use the other forms of leverage, but achar, you're much more interesting. The second type of leverage is capital, and this one's a little less hardwired into us because large amounts of money moving around and being saved and being invested in money markets are inventions of human beings over the last few hundred to few thousand years. They're not evolved with us from hundreds of thousands of years, so we understand them a little bit less well.

They probably require more intelligence to use correctly, and the ways in which we use them keep changing. Management skills from 100 years ago might still apply today, but investing in the stock market skills from 100 years ago probably don't apply to the same level today.

So capital is a trickier form of leverage to use for modern. It's the one that people have used to get fabulously wealthy in the last century. It's probably been the dominant form of leverage in the last century, and you can see this by the richest people. It's bankers, politicians, and corrupt countries who print money, especially people who move large amounts of money around.

If you look at the top of very large companies, outside of technology companies, in many, many large old companies, the CEO job is really a financial job. They're really financial asset managers. Sometimes, asset managing can put a pleasant face on it, so you get a Warren Buffett type, but deep down, I think we all dislike capital as a form of leverage because it feels unfair—it feels unfair because it's this invisible thing that can be accumulated and passed across generations, and suddenly seems to result in people having gargantuan amounts of m...

More Articles

View All
Beached Wheel | Life Below Zero
Just got done having my morning cup of coffee, and down here I can see the river really start dropping. Last night, it dropped a couple feet. I’m going to head up river, make sure my fish wheel is not high and dry. I can’t afford to just let a functional …
Rant: THIS is why you need to make YOUR OWN decisions...
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, I think between YouTube, Snapchat, and Instagram, I probably get a hundred messages per day. Now, one of the more common themes in messages that I get are questions like, “Hey Graham, is this a good idea? Should …
Why You Should STOP Saving Money - DO THIS NOW
What’s up guys, it’s Graham here. So, throughout my entire life, I’ve always been an excessive saver. No matter how much money I make, I always set a strict budget to follow. I calculate the bare minimum that I need, and then everything else above that is…
Khanmigo chat history demo | Introducing Khanmigo | Khanmigo for students | Khan Academy
Hey everybody, it’s Dan from the Con Academy team, and today I’ll be showing you all a brief introduction to our chat history feature. So, what is chat history? Well, if you’ve ever been using Kigo, and for whatever reason, maybe you’ve navigated to anot…
Worked example: Rewriting expressions by completing the square | High School Math | Khan Academy
Let’s see if we can take this quadratic expression here, ( x^2 + 16x + 9 ), and write it in this form. You might be saying, “Hey Sal, why do I even need to worry about this?” One, it is just good algebraic practice to be able to manipulate things. But as…
The Moons of Mars Explained -- Phobos & Deimos MM#2
The moons of Mars explained. Mars has two moons, Phobos and Deimos. They are really tiny. How tiny? Compared to Mars or our own moon, pretty tiny. Although, tiny is a matter of opinion. Their surface area is up close to some of the smallest states on Eart…