yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Definite integral properties (no graph): function combination | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Given that the definite integral from -1 to 3 of f of x dx is equal to -2, and the definite integral from -1 to 3 of G of x dx is equal to 5, what is the definite integral from -1 to 3 of 3 f of x - 2 G of x dx?

All right, so to think about this, what we could use is some of our integration properties.

The first thing that I would want to do is split this up into two integrals. We know that, and this is true of definite or indefinite integrals, that the integral of f of x plus or minus G of x dx is going to be equal to the integral of f of x dx plus or minus the integral of G of x dx. If this is a plus, this is going to be a plus; if this is a minus, this is going to be a minus.

So we could split this up the same way. This is going to be equal to the definite integral from -1 to 3 of 3 f of x dx minus the integral from -1 to 3 of 2 G of x dx. Notice all I did is I split it up. Taking the integral of the difference of these functions is the same thing as taking the difference of the integrals of those functions.

Now, the next thing we can do is take the scalars we're multiplying the functions on the inside by these numbers, three and two, and we can take those outside of the integral. That comes straight out of the property that if I'm taking the integral of some constant times f of x dx, that is equal to the constant times the integral of f of x dx.

So I can rewrite this as—let's see—I can rewrite this first integral as 3 times the definite integral from -1 to 3 of f of x dx, plus 2 times the definite integral from -1 to 3 of G of x dx. Actually, let me do the second one in a different color—minus, this is going to be magenta—minus 2 times the integral from -1 to 3 of G of x dx.

So what is this going to be equal to? Well, they tell us what this thing is here that I'm underlying in orange: the integral from -1 to 3 of f of x dx is equal to -2, so that thing is -2. Likewise, this thing right over here, the definite integral from -1 to 3 of G of x dx, they give it right over here; it's equal to 5, so that's equal to 5.

Therefore, the whole thing is going to be 3 times -2, which is equal to -6, minus 2 times 5, which is -10, and that's equal to -16. And we're done.

More Articles

View All
Announcing O'Leary Fine Wines
[Music] And we are back now with the new edition of Shar Tank. Your life, we have two entrepreneurs ready to go head-to-head. Kevin Oer from Shark Tank is here. We’ve already seen him double Dutch; it’s one of his many, many talents. Also wearing that Smi…
Do Sharks Hunt Cooperatively? | Shark Attack Files
In a remote atoll near Tahiti, Corey Garza, Andy Casagrande, and safety diver Perrick Seibold put themselves in the line of fire. These investigators test the theory that some tiger sharks may work together and hunt in packs. Before they know it, they’re …
How Millionaires Think About Business | ft. Randall Kaplan
Kevin: “How good is this flavor?” I said, “It’s fantastic! I worked with the cats; I know they love it.” He said, “No, you’re gonna eat some right now. Prove it!” He made me eat the whole tin in front of the entire sales group. I want to talk about you…
Lateral & total surface area of triangular prisms | Grade 8 (TX) | Khan Academy
We’re asked what is the lateral surface area of the triangular prism and what is the total surface area of the triangular prism. Pause this video and try to solve this on your own before we work through this together. All right, so first let’s just remin…
Worked example: rational vs. irrational expressions (unknowns) | High School Math | Khan Academy
We’re told let A and B be rational numbers and let B be non-zero. They had to say let B be non-zero because we’re about to divide by B. Is A over B rational or irrational? Well, let’s think about it. They’re both rational numbers, so that means that A, s…
The Real DEFINITIONS of SUCCESS
Everyone wants to be successful, but most people can’t define it because even if they tried, most people would get it wrong. We all know that after $125,000 per year, money no longer contributes to happiness or fulfillment. So, what does it actually mean …