yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Negative definite integrals | Integration and accumulation of change | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

We've already thought about what a definite integral means. If I'm taking the definite integral from ( a ) to ( b ) of ( f(x) , dx ), I can just view that as the area below my function ( f ).

So, if this is my y-axis, this is my x-axis, and ( y ) is equal to ( f(x) ). Something like that: ( y ) is equal to ( f(x) ). And if this is ( a ), and if this is ( b ), I could just view this expression as being equal to this area.

But what if my function was not above the x-axis? What if it was below the x-axis? So, these are going to be equivalent. Let's say, let me just draw that scenario. So let me draw a scenario where it's my x-axis that is my y-axis. And let's say I have, let's say I have a function that looks like that.

So that is ( y = g(x) ), and let's say that this right over here is ( a ), and this right over here is ( b ). And let's say that this area right over here is equal to 5. Well, if I were to ask you, what is the definite integral from ( a ) to ( b ) of ( g(x) , dx )? What do you think it is going to be?

Well, you might be tempted to say, "Hey, well it's just the area again between my curve and the x-axis." You might be tempted to say, "Hey, this is just going to be equal to 5." But you have to be very careful because if you're looking at the area above your curve and below your x-axis versus below your curve and above the x-axis, this definite integral is actually going to be the negative of the area.

Now, we'll see later on why this will work out nicely with a whole set of integration properties. But if you want to get some intuition for it, let's just think about velocity versus time graphs.

So if I... in my horizontal axis, that is time. My vertical axis, this is velocity, and velocity is going to be measured in meters per second. Time is going to be measured in seconds. Time is measured in seconds, and actually I'm going to do two scenarios here.

So let's say that I have a first velocity-time graph. Let's just call it ( v_1(t) ) which is equal to 3, and it would be 3 meters per second. So one, two, three. So it would look like that: that is ( v_1(t) ). And if I were to look at the definite integral going from time equals 1 to time equals 5 of ( v_1(t) , dt ), what would this be equal to?

Well, here my function is above my ( t )-axis, so I'll just go from 1 to 5, which will be around there. I could just think about the area here, and this area is pretty easy to calculate. It's going to be 3 meters per second times 4 seconds; that's my change in time.

So this is going to be 12 meters, and so this is going to be equal to 12. One way to conceptualize this is this gives us our change in position. If my velocity is 3 meters per second and since it's positive, you can conceptualize that as it's going to the right at 3 meters per second.

What is my change in position? Well, I would have gone 12 meters to the right, and you don't need calculus to figure that out. ( 3 , \text{m/s} \times 4 , \text{s} ) would be 12 meters. But what if it were the other way around? What if I had another velocity function?

Let's call that ( v_2(t) ) that is equal to negative 2 meters per second, and it's just a constant negative 2 meters per second. So this is ( v_2(t) ) right over here. What would or what should the definite integral from 1 to 5 of ( v_2(t) , dt ) be equal to?

Well, it should be equal to my change in position. But if my velocity is negative, that means I'm moving to the left. That means my change in position should be to the left as opposed to to the right.

So we can just look at this area right over here. When if you just look at it as the rectangle, it is going to be ( 2 \times 4 ), which is equal to 8. But you have to be very careful since it is below my horizontal axis and above my function. This is going to be negative.

And this should make a lot of sense. If I'm going 2 meters per second to the left for four seconds, or another way to think about it, if I'm going negative two meters per second for four seconds, then my change in position is going to be negative eight meters. I would have moved eight meters to the left if we say the convention is negative means to the left.

So the big takeaway is if it's below your function and above the horizontal axis, the definite integral, and if your ( a ) is less than ( b ), then your definite integral is going to be positive. If your ( a ) is less than ( b ), but your function over that interval is below the horizontal axis, then your definite integral is going to be negative.

And in the future, we'll also look at definite integrals that are a mix of both, but that's a little bit more complicated.

More Articles

View All
3 Ways To Crush Next Year
Hey there, relaxer! It’s that time of year again, time to start thinking about your goals and resolutions for the upcoming year. Last year, you said this year was the year. Well, maybe it’s actually time to take yourself more seriously. Now here’s the th…
I spent 24 hours with my AI girlfriend
In 2014, Spike Jonze released Her, a film about a man falling in love with his AI companion. The main character, Theodore Twombly, lives a lonely life after separating from his wife. One day, he purchases a software upgrade with a virtual assistant built …
Writing fraction division story problems
We’re told that Daryl spent 24 and one-fourth hours writing a chapter of a novel. Then they asked us, what are some things that 24 and one-fourth divided by three-fourths could represent in this context? So, my understanding of this is they really just w…
Buddhism: context and comparison | World History | Khan Academy
We’ve already had many videos on Buddhism and its connections to Hinduism, but what we want to do in this video is more explicitly answer an important question: Why did Buddhism emerge when and where it did? This is a question that you should always be as…
This just cost me $100,000 ...
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, it’s been about two weeks since I posted an update on the status of the home renovation, and yeah, geez! This is the episode that I’m sure everyone has been waiting for. Remember how I mentioned in the first vide…
Congruent shapes and transformations
We’re told Cassandra was curious if triangle ABC and triangle GFE were congruent, so he tried to map one figure onto the other using a rotation. So, let’s see. This is triangle ABC, and it looks like at first he rotates triangle ABC about point C to get i…