yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Test yourself: Can you tell the difference between music and noise? - Hanako Sawada


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

In 1960, American composer John Cage went on national television to share his latest work. But rather than employing traditional instruments, Cage appeared surrounded by household clutter, including a bathtub, ice cubes, a toy fish, a pressure cooker, a rubber duck, and several radios. Armed with these tools and a stopwatch, he performed “Water Walk,” setting off a series of sounds with a serious expression and incredible precision. Some viewers found the performance hysterical, while others thought it was completely absurd.

But most people watching likely shared the same question: is this even music? This question is harder to answer than you might think. What we determine as music often depends on our expectations. For example, imagine you’re in a jazz club listening to the rhythmic honking of horns. Most people would agree that this is music. But if you were on the highway hearing the same thing, many would call it noise. After all, car horns aren’t instruments and these drivers aren’t musicians... right? Expectations like these influence how we categorize everything we hear.

We typically think something sounds more musical if it uses a recognizable structure or popular sounds arranged in well-known patterns. And even within the realm of music, we expect certain genres to use specific instruments and harmonies. These expectations are based on existing musical traditions, but those traditions aren't set in stone. They vary across different cultures and time periods.

And in the early 20th century, when many artists were pushing the boundaries of their fields, John Cage wanted to discover what new kinds of music might exist beyond those constraints. He began pioneering new instruments that blurred the lines between art and everyday life, and used surprising objects to reinvent existing instruments. He also explored new ways for music to mingle with other art forms.

He and his creative and romantic partner, Merce Cunningham, held recitals where Cage’s music and Cunningham’s choreography would be created independently before being performed together. But whatever his approach, Cage gleefully dared listeners to question the boundaries between music and noise, as well as sound and silence. Perhaps the best example is one of Cage’s most famous compositions— a solo piano piece consisting of nothing but musical rests for four minutes and 33 seconds.

This wasn’t intended as a prank, but rather, as a question. Could the opening and closing of a piano lid be music? What about the click of a stopwatch? The rustling, and perhaps even the complaining, of a crowd? Like the white canvases of his painting peers, Cage asked the audience to question their expectations about what music was. And while the piece didn’t evoke the drama of some traditional compositions, it certainly elicited a strong emotional response.

Cage’s work frequently prioritized these spontaneous, ephemeral experiences over precise, predictable performances. He even developed processes that left some compositional decisions up to chance. One of his favorite such systems was the I Ching, an ancient Chinese divination text. Using just a handful of coins, the I Ching allows readers to produce a pattern of lines which can be interpreted to answer questions and offer fortunes.

But Cage adapted these patterns into a series of tables that generated different musical durations, tempos, and dynamics. Eventually, he even used early computers to help produce these random parameters. For some pieces, Cage went even further, offering musicians incomplete compositions notated with broad instructions, allowing them to compose on the fly with the help of his guidelines.

Some composers rejected Cage's seemingly careless approach. They believed it was the composer’s job to organize sound and time for a specific, intentional purpose. After all, if these strange compositions were music, then where do we draw the line? But like a bold explorer, Cage didn't want to be bound by restrictions, and he certainly didn't want to follow old rules. He dedicated himself to shattering our expectations, creating a series of once in a lifetime experiences that continue encouraging musicians and audiences to embrace the unexpected.

More Articles

View All
Meet The Real Estate Investor who RETIRED at 25 Years Old (Self Made)
To get there, there’s only three things you can do: you can spend less, you can earn more, you can maximize your returns. And in that word, like spending less, yeah, is this way more impactful because it allows you to save more, yeah, and it requires you …
The Man Who Accidentally Killed The Most People In History
One single scientist created three inventions that accidentally caused the deaths of millions of people, including himself. Not only that, they decreased the average intelligence of people all around the world, increased crime rates, and caused two comple…
The greatest TED Talk ever sold - Morgan Spurlock
[Music] I have spent the past few years putting myself into situations that are usually very difficult and at the same time somewhat dangerous. I went to prison—difficult. I worked in a coal mine—dangerous. I filmed in war zones—difficult and dangerous. A…
Finding Water in the Desert | Primal Survivor
(VOICEOVER)- The riverbed is bone dry. But the trees are still alive. So that means that there’s still water here somewhere. And if you pay enough attention, the desert will show you where to look. I’m just looking at these four-leaf ferns here. There’s m…
Why Skepticism Is the Right Approach to the Afterlife, Immortality, and Utopia | Michael Shermer
Well, Heavens on Earth was something of an extension of my previous books. I have not covered the afterlife in any kind of detail from my previous books on the paranormal, the supernatural, religion, God, morality—and so this was sort of a natural extensi…
The Upper-Class Bias of the 2016 Election Issues | C. Nicole Mason | Big Think
The issue I see in the election right now is that we’re not having the conversations that matter to people and families across the country. We have moved so far away from the bread and butter issues that families want to talk about. So we haven’t heard a …