yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Fracking explained: opportunity or danger


3m read
·Nov 2, 2024

What is hydraulic fracturing – or fracking? Since the industrial revolution, our energy consumption has risen unceasingly. The majority of this energy consumption is supplied by fossil fuels like coal or natural gas. Recently, there has been a lot of talk about a controversial method of extracting natural gas: hydraulic fracturing or fracking.

Put simply, fracking describes the recovery of natural gas from deep layers inside the earth. In this method, porous rock is fractured by the use of water, sand, and chemicals in order to release the enclosed natural gas. The technique of fracking has been known since the 1940s. Nonetheless, only in the last ten years has there been quite a “fracking boom”, especially in the USA. This is because most conventional natural gas sources in America and on the European continent have been exhausted.

Thus, prices for natural gas and other fuels are rising steadily. Significantly more complicated and expensive methods, like fracking, have now become attractive and profitable. In the meantime, fracking has already been used more than a million times in the USA alone. Over 60% of all new oil and gas wells are drilled by using fracking.

Now let’s take a look at how fracking actually works: First, a shaft is drilled several hundred meters into the earth. From there, a horizontal hole is drilled into the gas-bearing layer of rock. Next, the fracking fluid is pumped into the ground using high-performance pumps. On average, the fluid consists of 8 million liters of water, which amounts to about the daily consumption of 65,000 people, plus several thousand tons of sand and about 200,000 liters of chemicals.

The mixture penetrates into the rock layer and produces innumerable tiny cracks. The sand prevents the cracks from closing again. The chemicals perform various tasks; among other things, they condense the water, kill off bacteria, or dissolve minerals. Next, the majority of the fracking fluid is pumped out again. And now the natural gas can be recovered. As soon as the gas source is exhausted, the drill hole is sealed.

As a rule, the fracking fluid is pumped back into deep underground layers and sealed in there. However, fracking is also associated with several considerable risks. The primary risk consists in the contamination of drinking water sources. Fracking not only consumes large quantities of fresh water, but in addition, the water is subsequently contaminated and is highly toxic.

The contamination is so severe that the water cannot even be cleaned in a treatment plant. Even though the danger is known and theoretically could be managed, in the USA already sources have been contaminated due to negligence. No one yet knows how the enclosed water will behave in the future, since there have not yet been any long-term studies on the subject.

The chemicals used in fracking vary from the hazardous to the extremely toxic and carcinogenic, such as benzol or formic acid. The companies using fracking say nothing about the precise composition of the chemical mixture. But it is known that there are about 700 different chemical agents that can be used in the process.

Another risk is the release of greenhouse gases. The natural gas recovered by fracking consists largely of methane, a greenhouse gas which is 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide. Natural gas is less harmful than coal when burned. But nonetheless, the negative effects of fracking on the climate balance are overall greater.

Firstly, the fracking process requires a very large consumption of energy. Secondly, the drill holes are quickly exhausted, and it is necessary to drill fracking holes much more frequently than for classical natural gas wells. In addition, about 3% of the recovered gas is lost in the extraction and escapes into the atmosphere.

So how is fracking and its expected benefits to be assessed when the advantages are balanced against the disadvantages? When properly employed, this technique offers one way in the short to medium term for meeting our demand for lower-cost energy. But the long-term consequences of fracking are unforeseeable, and the risk to our drinking water thus should not be underestimated.

Subtitles by the Amara.org community.

More Articles

View All
Flight at the Edge of the Ozone Layer | One Strange Rock
NARRATOR: 30 years ago, we discovered man-made chemicals had punched a hole in the ozone layer. Is that hole here to stay, waiting around to kill us? Today, we’re trying hard to find out. Morgan Sandercock is about to test an experimental plane, perfect f…
Making a Deal With a Cartel Boss | Locked Up Abroad
Boston is the university capital of the United States. There was a lot of rich kids who just wanted to smoke pot, and it was a perfect market for us. We felt indestructible; people were getting hired, they loved our product. [Music] Our business grew an…
Fishing Under the Ice | Life Below Zero
♪ CHIP: When you’re providing things, you’re doing things, it’s so much easier when you’re done with the work to sit back and enjoy than to spend a whole day doing nothing. ♪ ♪ CAROL: Come to me, fishy, fishy. WADE: That sounded new to me, too. AGNES: …
Meet Six Rescued Rhinos That Survived Poaching | Short Film Showcase
Dingle, darlin’, lion’s den. They both lost their horns to poaching. They hit Worden family one day. Nice. How could the other panic? In his voice he said, “Are you, are you nuts? Press!” I said, “I said game drivers has come in, reported they were raided…
Parking Lot Drug Bust | To Catch a Smuggler
[music playing] [sirens blaring] DAVE: (VOICEOVER) She keeps reaching around in the center console. It looks like she’s trying to get something out, maybe a handgun. MAN: All right, GSP has a driver out of the vehicle. DAVE: That’s our girl. Was it loa…
Re: The Trouble With The Electoral College – Cities, Metro Areas, Elections and The United States
Hello, internet. Let’s talk about this map, this argument, and the Electoral College in general. In my “Trouble With The Electoral College” video from 2011, I was wrong to use the city limits for that part of the argument, rather than the more expansive m…