yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Shadow Of Toxic Positivity


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Negative thinking can really impede one’s ability to lead a fulfilling life. When everything is wrong with the world and nothing is worth pursuing; what’s the point in life, really? Even though a positive mindset is generally more preferable than a negative one, there’s also a dark side to the whole ‘positivity culture’ we see nowadays. That’s why I think it’s time to talk about... the shadow of toxic positivity.

We all know those people that are always happy, shiny, and utterly optimistic about everything. They are equipped with clear-cut, exclusively positive maxims to approach life’s problems, no matter how big or small. You’ll probably notice that when you talk to them about a specific situation you’re dealing with, that they sprinkle you with stereotypical sweet-nothing-optimism, which is supposed to make your problems go away in an instant. Your spouse dumped you? “You’ll get over it!” You’ve just been diagnosed with a severe illness like cancer? “Be positive!” You’ve been cheated on and lied to so many times that you can’t trust people anymore? “Stop being so negative!”

Now, I don’t think that there’s something inherently wrong with wishing another person happiness and freedom of suffering. On the contrary. So I suspect that statements like these come from a sincere place of love. But also from blissful ignorance that, when we look closer, isn’t so blissful as it seems. The problem, however, is that these phrases contain a certain degree of denial of an indisputable part of life: suffering. Toxic positivity is the refusal to see the negative - even when it’s the elephant in the room - while solely focusing on the positive. Instead of facing reality as it is, it chooses rather a fake-it-till-you-make-it attitude, artificial smiles, and brushing anything undesirable under the carpet.

The ancient Stoics wrote extensively about how our thoughts about a certain event influence our emotions, and not the event itself. I quote: “Men are disturbed, not by things, but by the principles and notions which they form concerning things. Death, for instance, is not terrible, else it would have appeared so to Socrates. But the terror consists in our notion of death that it is terrible.” End quote. From a Stoic perspective, positivity is a mindset. We can look at the bright side of things in order to feel better about them. But this doesn’t happen overnight. It takes a lot of practice.

When you’re diagnosed with a terminal illness, for example, you probably won’t be able to simply ‘shrug it off’ and be happy about it. Even though this might be a philosophical ideal; the reality is that the vast majority of people do not work that way and, most likely, never will. In general, human beings experience deep grievances over loss and death that we simply cannot refuse to see.

So, is denial of something that is a healthy position to take? I don’t think so. The ‘things’ that Epictetus speaks of can very well be the emotions that are evoked by unfortunate events. We can position ourselves towards these emotions saying: “just be happy!” or “stop being so negative! Be positive!” The tricky part of such a position is that a positive mindstate and the experience of happiness is indeed more preferable; but by rejecting and disapproving of what is - i.e., grief, sadness, anger, et cetera - our current mind state will only get worse.

Mind states have to grow naturally. The only thing we can do is create certain conditions in which we’re more likely to become happy, like the pursuit of virtue in Stoicism and the Eightfold Path in Buddhism. But we cannot force ourselves to be happy by saying: “just think happy thoughts!” It just won’t work.

What’s even worse are the “good vibes only” kind of people that have zero-tolerance for anything that they perceive as “negative”, insisting that they only surround themselves with happy, shiny, and upbeat people. Well, good luck with that. I’m not saying that they should surround themselves with utterly cynical o...

More Articles

View All
The First Meeting of EDUtubers! ft. CGPGrey, Vsauce, Smarter Every Day, Numberphile +more
Hey, Veritasium! Michael [Stevens] from Vsauce here, and we’re gonna ask some important questions. Let’s find some random bystanders…how about you? Yes? Michael: I don’t believe you’re scientifically literate. Okay. Michael: If a tomato is a fruit, do…
Gordon Ramsay Goes Cast Net Fishing in Laos | Gordon Ramsay: Uncharted
First of all, an absolute pleasure because you’ve helped put Lao cuisine on the map. I’m dying to get to understand Lao cuisine. Food not too sweet, but we use lots of stuff that we get from the forest or swimming river. We also use more herbs. Wow, that…
Stratospheric Ozone Depletion| Global change| AP Environmental Science| Khan Academy
In this video, we’re going to talk about a molecule known as ozone. Ozone you can also view as O3 or three oxygens bonded this way. These dashed lines show that sometimes the double bond is on this side, sometimes it’s on that side. You might recognize th…
Noble’s Story | How Khan Academy helped me get into my dream college
That was one of the best days of my life. Honestly, like signing day, I just knew that all the hard work that I put into this dream finally paid off. I’m Noble; I’m a freshman at Brown University. I’m a receiver on the football team. It became apparent t…
Baker v. Carr | Interactions among branches of government | US government and civics | Khan Academy
[Kim] Hi, this is Kim from Khan Academy. Today we’re learning more about Baker versus Carr, a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1962. Baker versus Carr grappled with an incredibly important issue: whether one person’s vote is equal to another person’…
URGENT: Federal Reserve Pushes Rate Cuts, Prices Rise, Market Hits All-Time-High!
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here, and you got to pay close attention to what just happened. As of a few hours ago, the Federal Reserve decided to once again pause any rate cuts for the foreseeable future. As a result, we are okay. In all seriousness, th…