yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

The Shadow Of Toxic Positivity


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

Negative thinking can really impede one’s ability to lead a fulfilling life. When everything is wrong with the world and nothing is worth pursuing; what’s the point in life, really? Even though a positive mindset is generally more preferable than a negative one, there’s also a dark side to the whole ‘positivity culture’ we see nowadays. That’s why I think it’s time to talk about... the shadow of toxic positivity.

We all know those people that are always happy, shiny, and utterly optimistic about everything. They are equipped with clear-cut, exclusively positive maxims to approach life’s problems, no matter how big or small. You’ll probably notice that when you talk to them about a specific situation you’re dealing with, that they sprinkle you with stereotypical sweet-nothing-optimism, which is supposed to make your problems go away in an instant. Your spouse dumped you? “You’ll get over it!” You’ve just been diagnosed with a severe illness like cancer? “Be positive!” You’ve been cheated on and lied to so many times that you can’t trust people anymore? “Stop being so negative!”

Now, I don’t think that there’s something inherently wrong with wishing another person happiness and freedom of suffering. On the contrary. So I suspect that statements like these come from a sincere place of love. But also from blissful ignorance that, when we look closer, isn’t so blissful as it seems. The problem, however, is that these phrases contain a certain degree of denial of an indisputable part of life: suffering. Toxic positivity is the refusal to see the negative - even when it’s the elephant in the room - while solely focusing on the positive. Instead of facing reality as it is, it chooses rather a fake-it-till-you-make-it attitude, artificial smiles, and brushing anything undesirable under the carpet.

The ancient Stoics wrote extensively about how our thoughts about a certain event influence our emotions, and not the event itself. I quote: “Men are disturbed, not by things, but by the principles and notions which they form concerning things. Death, for instance, is not terrible, else it would have appeared so to Socrates. But the terror consists in our notion of death that it is terrible.” End quote. From a Stoic perspective, positivity is a mindset. We can look at the bright side of things in order to feel better about them. But this doesn’t happen overnight. It takes a lot of practice.

When you’re diagnosed with a terminal illness, for example, you probably won’t be able to simply ‘shrug it off’ and be happy about it. Even though this might be a philosophical ideal; the reality is that the vast majority of people do not work that way and, most likely, never will. In general, human beings experience deep grievances over loss and death that we simply cannot refuse to see.

So, is denial of something that is a healthy position to take? I don’t think so. The ‘things’ that Epictetus speaks of can very well be the emotions that are evoked by unfortunate events. We can position ourselves towards these emotions saying: “just be happy!” or “stop being so negative! Be positive!” The tricky part of such a position is that a positive mindstate and the experience of happiness is indeed more preferable; but by rejecting and disapproving of what is - i.e., grief, sadness, anger, et cetera - our current mind state will only get worse.

Mind states have to grow naturally. The only thing we can do is create certain conditions in which we’re more likely to become happy, like the pursuit of virtue in Stoicism and the Eightfold Path in Buddhism. But we cannot force ourselves to be happy by saying: “just think happy thoughts!” It just won’t work.

What’s even worse are the “good vibes only” kind of people that have zero-tolerance for anything that they perceive as “negative”, insisting that they only surround themselves with happy, shiny, and upbeat people. Well, good luck with that. I’m not saying that they should surround themselves with utterly cynical o...

More Articles

View All
Federalism in the United States | US government and civics | Khan Academy
What we’re going to do in this video is talk about the idea of federalism, which is core to the United States government. Now, federalism, the word originates, its root comes from the Latin word “fetus,” which I’m probably not pronouncing perfectly, but …
Touching Plasma PhD Research Opportunities at UAH - Smarter Every Day 193
Hey, it’s me Destin! Welcome back to Smarter Every Day. Here’s the deal: um, I’m in a super weird place in life right now. I’ve got four kids. I’m an engineer. I’ve got this YouTube thing, I give talks, but my channel name is Smarter Every Day. I’ve been …
Climbing the Polar Bear Fang | Nat Geo Live
( intro music ) Mike Libecki: Sixty-five expeditions and counting and the goal is to do 100 expeditions by 100 years old. This is what I call the Polar Bear Fang. And I’ve been trying to this tower for ten years. For a climber, this is as good as it gets…
Fireside Chat with Tanay Tandon of Athelas
So I would love to welcome Tenae Tandon onto the stage. Uh, Tenae is the CEO and founder of Othellis, a digital health company that you’re going to be hearing all about. YC first met Tenae when he was 17 years old when he first won YC’s first hackathon. N…
Worked example: Measuring the energy content of foods using soda-can calorimetry | Khan Academy
Calorimetry refers to the measurement of heat flow, and in this worked example, we’re going to burn a marshmallow and find the energy content of the marshmallow. First, let’s look at this setup for our soda can calorimeter. So, our soda can has some wate…
these inventions changed the world..
The latrine, the porcelain throne, the Oval Office toilets… do I really need to say anything here? Before toilets, we would literally use buckets or just went into the forest or peed on a tree or something. We didn’t really have any efficient way of getti…