yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Why don't "tough" and "dough" rhyme? - Arika Okrent


3m read
·Nov 8, 2024

It was June 2010. Inside the Scripps National Spelling Bee, contestants between 8- and 15-years-old wrestled words like brachydactylous and leguleian. Outside, a crowd protested the complexity of English spelling conventions. Indeed, spelling reformers have been around for centuries, advocating for overarching changes to make English spelling more intuitive.

The English language is chock-full of irregularities. One commonly used example of this: take the “g-h” sound from “enough,” the “o” sound from “women,” and the “t-i” sound from “action,” and you could argue that “g-h-o-t-i” spells “fish.” So, how did English get like this? English arose from old Germanic tribes that invaded the British Isles more than 1,500 years ago. Their languages coalesced and evolved into Old English.

When Roman missionaries arrived around 600 CE, they devised ways to write it down using the Latin alphabet, supplementing it with some Germanic runes for sounds they didn’t have letters for. Then came the Norman invasion of 1066 when French speakers conquered England. French became the language of authority and high society. But English remained the dominant spoken language.

Over time, those descended from French speakers also became English speakers, but some French words snuck into the language. Some English speakers were also familiar with Latin through the church and formal education. By the mid-1400s, people were writing in English again—but it was unstandardized. They used a mix of influences to determine word choice and spelling, including the French they knew, the Latin they studied, and the English they spoke. So, things were already pretty messy.

Then, in 1476, the printing press arrived in England. Some of the people working the presses may have mainly spoken Flemish—not English. And they were given manuscripts that varied widely in their spelling. Without standardization, different writers went with various spellings based in part on what they happened to encounter while reading. Many words had a multitude of spellings. The word “dough,” for instance, used to be spelled in all these ways and was originally pronounced “dach.”

The guttural Germanic sound it ended with was one the Latin alphabet didn’t cover. It eventually came to be represented with “g-h.” But, for some “g-h” words, English speakers eventually dropped the guttural sound altogether; for others, they ended up pronouncing it as “f” instead, as exemplified in “dough” versus “tough.” Printing presses memorialized the spelling even though the pronunciation eventually changed. And this wasn’t just the case with “g-h.” Some letters in other words also fell silent: words like knife, gnat, and wrong all contain the vestiges of past pronunciations.

But while the printing press was solidifying spellings, the English language was also undergoing what scholars call the Great Vowel Shift. Between the 14th and 18th centuries, the way English speakers pronounced many vowels changed significantly. For instance, “bawt” became “boat.” This displaced the word for “boot,” which had up until then been pronounced “boat,” and pushed it into the high “u” vowel position it maintains today. Words that already had this high “u” often became diphthongs, with two vowels in a single syllable. So, “hus” became “house.”

As with so many linguistic matters, there's no clear reason why this happened. But it did. And how the vowel shift affected a word depended on various things, including the other sounds in the word. The word “tough” was once “tōh,” among other variations. “Through” was once “thruch” and “dough” “dah.” These words all started with different vowel sounds that were then affected differently by the vowel shift. The “o-u” spelling they all adopted was a haphazardly applied French influence.

So, eventually they wound up with still distinct vowel sounds, but similar spellings that don’t really make much sense. All this means English can be a difficult language for non-native speakers to learn. And it reveals the many ways history, in all its messiness, acted upon English, making it especially tough.

More Articles

View All
My Response to the NAR Lawsuit (Real Estate Is Changing Forever)
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So this is something I wasn’t sure I wanted to address or even if there’d be enough interest for me to talk about this. But after repeatedly being asked to comment on the recent class action lawsuit against the Nati…
Safari Live - Day 348 | National Geographic
This program features live coverage of an African safari and may include animal kills and carcasses. Viewer discretion is advised. Good afternoon, everybody! A very good afternoon on this Sunday, coming to you live from the Mara Triangle in Kenya. My nam…
Startup Hiring Advice from Lever CEO Sarah Nahm with Holly Liu
Seren: Holly, welcome to the podcast! Holly: Thanks for having us! Seren: Yeah, pumped! So, Holly, you have a question to start it off? Holly: Yeah, I’m super curious. Did you ever see yourself becoming a founder, a founding CEO? Holly: Oh my gosh, I …
The actual reason why you procrastinate and how to fix it
It’s 6:00 p.m. You just got back home, and you’ve got a task that has been lingering in your mind, waiting to be checked off your list. It could be a project for work or school, house chores that can’t be ignored any longer, or maybe it’s about spending q…
15 Ways to Create GENERATIONAL WEALTH
By the time 65 rolls around, only one in 100 people will be well off financially. 70% of wealthy families lose their wealth by the second generation and more so around 90% of families lose all wealth by the third generation. So, even if you make a fortune…
Definite integral of piecewise function | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we have an f of x right over here, and it’s defined piecewise. For x less than zero, f of x is x plus one. For x greater than or equal to zero, f of x is cosine of pi x. We want to evaluate the definite integral from negative one to one of f of x dx. …