yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Naming two isobutyl groups systematically | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In the last video, we named this molecule using the common names for this group right over here, and I thought it would be fun to also use to do the same thing, but use the systematic name. So, in the last video, we called this isobu, but if we wanted to do it systematically, we would look at this group.

We would start at where it is attached to the main backbone, and we would think about the longest chain of carbons from there. So if we start there, we can get one, two, three carbons. So if we're dealing with three carbons, then this is going to be a propy group, and we would number it one, two, three.

And we see on the two carbon of the propy group, the two carbon of the propy group, we have a one carbon group right over here. So this is a methyl group branching off of the two carbon of the propy group. So we could call this; we could call this thing the systematic name. Instead of calling it isobu, we could call it two methyl. That's the methyl group right over there.

So let me write this down: two, two methyl propy, two methyl propyl, two methyl propy, and so this is the systematic name. And of course, there's two of them. This is a two methyl propyl right over here. Instead of an isobu, we'll call it two methyl propyl, and this is another two methyl propyl.

So instead of writing the 57 di-isob here, we can instead substitute that with the systematic name. So let's do that. Let me copy and paste everything else that comes before it. So let me copy, copy, and paste it. Whoops, whoops, I'm in the wrong layer of my program.

Let me go one layer down, so let me copy and paste it again. Copy and paste. There we go. So I got that part, but now I'm going to write this part differently. So we still have stuff. It's still on the five carbon and the seven carbon of our main chain, so five, seven.

And we have two of them, but when we're doing systematic naming, we won't say di this thing. Instead, we say bis. So five, five, seven B. That says that, hey, we got two of what I'm about to say, B this thing.

So let me copy. That's in a different layer. Let me copy and let me paste that B this stuff right over here. And then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and we are done. We have named it systematically as well.

More Articles

View All
The 5 Financial Goals To Achieve In Your 20s
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So, I have no idea how to start this video other than to say that I went down a bit of a rabbit hole the other day. You know, like when you come across something online and then for some reason, you open up another ta…
The Desire to Not Exist
Sleep is good; death is better. Yet surely never to have been born is best. These lines close a 17th-century poem by German writer Hinrich Hine. The piece is titled “Death and His Brother’s Sleep.” It compares these two states, suggesting that we experien…
Subtraction strategies with hundredths
About some strategies subtracting decimals that involve hundreds. So, for example, if I have 0.69 or 69 hundredths, and from that I want to subtract 0.34 or 34 hundredths, what is that going to be? Pause this video and see if you can compute this. So, t…
Investing Mistakes the RICH Don’t Make
There’s a one major difference between those who are successful investors and those who aren’t: decision making. It’s the most valuable skill anyone can improve. By the end of this video, you’ll have a clear understanding of what separates these two group…
Texas Teachers! Here's how to use TEKS-aligned unit guides on Khan Academy
Hello, I’m Jennifer, the Texas professional learning specialist with KH Academy and a former classroom teacher just like you. I am excited to introduce you to the unit guides available in our new TE aligned courses. These guides are designed to support e…
15 Ways to Create GENERATIONAL WEALTH
By the time 65 rolls around, only one in 100 people will be well off financially. 70% of wealthy families lose their wealth by the second generation and more so around 90% of families lose all wealth by the third generation. So, even if you make a fortune…