yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Naming two isobutyl groups systematically | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In the last video, we named this molecule using the common names for this group right over here, and I thought it would be fun to also use to do the same thing, but use the systematic name. So, in the last video, we called this isobu, but if we wanted to do it systematically, we would look at this group.

We would start at where it is attached to the main backbone, and we would think about the longest chain of carbons from there. So if we start there, we can get one, two, three carbons. So if we're dealing with three carbons, then this is going to be a propy group, and we would number it one, two, three.

And we see on the two carbon of the propy group, the two carbon of the propy group, we have a one carbon group right over here. So this is a methyl group branching off of the two carbon of the propy group. So we could call this; we could call this thing the systematic name. Instead of calling it isobu, we could call it two methyl. That's the methyl group right over there.

So let me write this down: two, two methyl propy, two methyl propyl, two methyl propy, and so this is the systematic name. And of course, there's two of them. This is a two methyl propyl right over here. Instead of an isobu, we'll call it two methyl propyl, and this is another two methyl propyl.

So instead of writing the 57 di-isob here, we can instead substitute that with the systematic name. So let's do that. Let me copy and paste everything else that comes before it. So let me copy, copy, and paste it. Whoops, whoops, I'm in the wrong layer of my program.

Let me go one layer down, so let me copy and paste it again. Copy and paste. There we go. So I got that part, but now I'm going to write this part differently. So we still have stuff. It's still on the five carbon and the seven carbon of our main chain, so five, seven.

And we have two of them, but when we're doing systematic naming, we won't say di this thing. Instead, we say bis. So five, five, seven B. That says that, hey, we got two of what I'm about to say, B this thing.

So let me copy. That's in a different layer. Let me copy and let me paste that B this stuff right over here. And then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and we are done. We have named it systematically as well.

More Articles

View All
Worked example: Determining an empirical formula from combustion data | AP Chemistry | Khan Academy
We are told that a sample of a compound containing only carbon and hydrogen atoms is completely combusted, producing 5.65 grams of carbon dioxide and 3.47 grams of H2O, or water. What is the empirical formula of the compound? So pause this video and see i…
How I Built 7 Income Streams at 23 That Retired My Parents
Everyone’s talking about building multiple income streams, jumping side hustle to side Hustle, but here’s what nobody’s telling you: In today’s AI driven economy, being average at multiple things is actually the riskiest position you can be in. Instead of…
HOW TO MAKE EASY MONEY IN THE STOCK MARKET
What’s up? Grandma’s guys here! So, after a year patiently waiting and getting hundreds of comments, DMs, emails, letters, and smoke signals asking me how my stock market investments are doing, the time has finally come to reveal exactly how much money I …
The rise of industrial capitalism | AP US History | Khan Academy
[Instructor] The period from the end of the Civil War to the start of the 20th Century was one of incredible economic transformation in the United States. In 1865, the United States was the 4th largest industrial economy in the world. By the 1890s, it had…
What do quadratic approximations look like
In the last couple of videos, I talked about the local linearization of a function. In terms of graphs, there’s a nice interpretation here. If you imagine the graph of a function and you want to approximate it near a specific point, you picture that point…
Time past between two clock faces
We are asked how much time has passed from the time on the left, so right over here, to the time on the right, which we see right over here. They say that the time passed is less than 12 hours. So like always, pause this video and see if you can answer th…