yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Naming two isobutyl groups systematically | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In the last video, we named this molecule using the common names for this group right over here, and I thought it would be fun to also use to do the same thing, but use the systematic name. So, in the last video, we called this isobu, but if we wanted to do it systematically, we would look at this group.

We would start at where it is attached to the main backbone, and we would think about the longest chain of carbons from there. So if we start there, we can get one, two, three carbons. So if we're dealing with three carbons, then this is going to be a propy group, and we would number it one, two, three.

And we see on the two carbon of the propy group, the two carbon of the propy group, we have a one carbon group right over here. So this is a methyl group branching off of the two carbon of the propy group. So we could call this; we could call this thing the systematic name. Instead of calling it isobu, we could call it two methyl. That's the methyl group right over there.

So let me write this down: two, two methyl propy, two methyl propyl, two methyl propy, and so this is the systematic name. And of course, there's two of them. This is a two methyl propyl right over here. Instead of an isobu, we'll call it two methyl propyl, and this is another two methyl propyl.

So instead of writing the 57 di-isob here, we can instead substitute that with the systematic name. So let's do that. Let me copy and paste everything else that comes before it. So let me copy, copy, and paste it. Whoops, whoops, I'm in the wrong layer of my program.

Let me go one layer down, so let me copy and paste it again. Copy and paste. There we go. So I got that part, but now I'm going to write this part differently. So we still have stuff. It's still on the five carbon and the seven carbon of our main chain, so five, seven.

And we have two of them, but when we're doing systematic naming, we won't say di this thing. Instead, we say bis. So five, five, seven B. That says that, hey, we got two of what I'm about to say, B this thing.

So let me copy. That's in a different layer. Let me copy and let me paste that B this stuff right over here. And then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and we are done. We have named it systematically as well.

More Articles

View All
The CEO Who Pays Employees to De-Locate From the Bay
I haven’t started with questions from Twitter before, but I feel like they kind of covered some of the initial ones I wanted to go off with, uh-huh. So maybe we should just go with those. All right, so the first one was from Ben Thompson, and he asked fo…
The Real Reason Flames Don't Have Shadows
Uh, why don’t flames have shadows? Like, I mean, hello, it’s kind of freaky. But it has everything to do with what a hydrocarbon flame is. When you look at a candle flame, the part you can see is not a gas, and it’s not a plasma, believe it or not. The p…
Digging the Scrap Heap | Port Protection
Most of the people who live in the bush are fiercely independent, and I don’t suppose when I’m any different. Today I’m scrounging. Well, I’m just trying to procure enough pieces of old steel now I can get together, and I can throw together a prototype of…
How I spend my $163,800 per month income
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So this is one of those videos where if enough people are asking for a certain video topic, I will go ahead and make it. Like I said, this is one of them. After posting my income breakdown video where I went over my …
Teleportation: Tearing the Fabric of Spacetime
The date is October 23rd, 1593. The governor of the Philippines had just been assassinated a few days after setting off on our journey from Manila. His ship and crew were overthrown by Chinese pirates on board. When the news of his assassination reached t…
Why You SHOULD NOT Buy A Home
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So today we’re going to be talking about one of the most debated questions of mankind, something that philosophers have been pondering since the beginning of time. And no, it’s not what’s the meaning of life. It’s not…