yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Naming two isobutyl groups systematically | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In the last video, we named this molecule using the common names for this group right over here, and I thought it would be fun to also use to do the same thing, but use the systematic name. So, in the last video, we called this isobu, but if we wanted to do it systematically, we would look at this group.

We would start at where it is attached to the main backbone, and we would think about the longest chain of carbons from there. So if we start there, we can get one, two, three carbons. So if we're dealing with three carbons, then this is going to be a propy group, and we would number it one, two, three.

And we see on the two carbon of the propy group, the two carbon of the propy group, we have a one carbon group right over here. So this is a methyl group branching off of the two carbon of the propy group. So we could call this; we could call this thing the systematic name. Instead of calling it isobu, we could call it two methyl. That's the methyl group right over there.

So let me write this down: two, two methyl propy, two methyl propyl, two methyl propy, and so this is the systematic name. And of course, there's two of them. This is a two methyl propyl right over here. Instead of an isobu, we'll call it two methyl propyl, and this is another two methyl propyl.

So instead of writing the 57 di-isob here, we can instead substitute that with the systematic name. So let's do that. Let me copy and paste everything else that comes before it. So let me copy, copy, and paste it. Whoops, whoops, I'm in the wrong layer of my program.

Let me go one layer down, so let me copy and paste it again. Copy and paste. There we go. So I got that part, but now I'm going to write this part differently. So we still have stuff. It's still on the five carbon and the seven carbon of our main chain, so five, seven.

And we have two of them, but when we're doing systematic naming, we won't say di this thing. Instead, we say bis. So five, five, seven B. That says that, hey, we got two of what I'm about to say, B this thing.

So let me copy. That's in a different layer. Let me copy and let me paste that B this stuff right over here. And then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and we are done. We have named it systematically as well.

More Articles

View All
The Law You Won't Be Told
On a jury, you know your options: guilty, or not. But there’s another choice that neither the judge nor the lawyers will tell you—often because they’re not allowed to, and also it might be better if you don’t know. This video will tell you that third choi…
How to HACK Flash Games -- And More! *DONG*
Dang it. This is too real. I want something I could do online now, guys. DONG. Let’s start things off with a Tetris Overload. ‘Muse13NJ’ showed me this first person Tetris. When you turn a piece, so does your perspective. It’s fun, but ‘Dixavd’ would rath…
Deserts 101 | National Geographic
[Narrator] Wind whips over a barren wasteland. Vast nothingness as far as the eye can see, or so it may seem. Creatures peek out of burrows, scurry across the sand, and soar through the sky, revealing a landscape not as lifeless as it might first appear. …
Artificial selection and domestication | Natural selection | AP Biology | Khan Academy
Most of us are familiar with dogs, oftentimes known as man’s best friend. What’s fascinating about them is that they are one species, even though different types of dogs, different breeds, could look very, very different. The fact that they’re one species…
Bill Belichick & Ray Dalio on Bill's Most Important Principles: Part 2
Yeah, and that’s that. Of course, it is harder to do in today’s society with social media, and so there’s a lot of feedback from social media. People who don’t know the players, the team, have an opinion—like, dislike, whatever it is—but they don’t reall…
You Can't Trust Your Ears
I want you to listen to these two sounds and decide which is higher. So this is sound A. (sample sound buzzing) And this is sound B. (sample sound buzzing) Okay, so to me, sound A is clearly higher, but that’s strange because sound A was just a 100 hertz …