yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Naming two isobutyl groups systematically | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In the last video, we named this molecule using the common names for this group right over here, and I thought it would be fun to also use to do the same thing, but use the systematic name. So, in the last video, we called this isobu, but if we wanted to do it systematically, we would look at this group.

We would start at where it is attached to the main backbone, and we would think about the longest chain of carbons from there. So if we start there, we can get one, two, three carbons. So if we're dealing with three carbons, then this is going to be a propy group, and we would number it one, two, three.

And we see on the two carbon of the propy group, the two carbon of the propy group, we have a one carbon group right over here. So this is a methyl group branching off of the two carbon of the propy group. So we could call this; we could call this thing the systematic name. Instead of calling it isobu, we could call it two methyl. That's the methyl group right over there.

So let me write this down: two, two methyl propy, two methyl propyl, two methyl propy, and so this is the systematic name. And of course, there's two of them. This is a two methyl propyl right over here. Instead of an isobu, we'll call it two methyl propyl, and this is another two methyl propyl.

So instead of writing the 57 di-isob here, we can instead substitute that with the systematic name. So let's do that. Let me copy and paste everything else that comes before it. So let me copy, copy, and paste it. Whoops, whoops, I'm in the wrong layer of my program.

Let me go one layer down, so let me copy and paste it again. Copy and paste. There we go. So I got that part, but now I'm going to write this part differently. So we still have stuff. It's still on the five carbon and the seven carbon of our main chain, so five, seven.

And we have two of them, but when we're doing systematic naming, we won't say di this thing. Instead, we say bis. So five, five, seven B. That says that, hey, we got two of what I'm about to say, B this thing.

So let me copy. That's in a different layer. Let me copy and let me paste that B this stuff right over here. And then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and we are done. We have named it systematically as well.

More Articles

View All
Jerome Powell: The Great Inflation Stalemate Has Begun
We know that reducing policy restraint too soon could result in a reversal of the progress that we’ve seen on inflation. At the same time, reducing policy restraint too late or too little could unduly weaken economic activity and employment. Right now, th…
Future Founders Conference for Women Globally
[Music] We are all excited to have you here at our very first Future Founders Conference for Women. We believe that creating a platform where successful women can share their stories and advice is one way to bring about even more successful women-led busi…
Is War Over? — A Paradox Explained
Violence and war. The insane brutality of ISIS continues, the Russians are invading Ukraine, and the Palestinians and Israelis continue to slug it out. Does that make you feel gloomy? Well, don’t. Because if you look at the numbers, war actually seems to …
The 19th Amendment and citizenship | Citizenship | High school civics | Khan Academy
[Instructor] We’re nearing the 100th anniversary of the ratification of the 19th Amendment, which says that the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex. This was…
What Colour Is Most Attractive?
[Music] The Sydney dating scene is pretty superficial. But what do people want in a partner? We asked some local Sydneysiders to rate these two stock photo babes out of 10 based purely on their looks. “How would you rate him?” “Six.” “Six? Yeah, lovely s…
What could be ahead for the US dollar?
Throughout the last, you know, 30-40 years, there have been many moments where we said we’re on the brink of collapse. What is the time frame you think for when this is going to get really bad? And when it does get really bad, what would that actually loo…