yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Naming two isobutyl groups systematically | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In the last video, we named this molecule using the common names for this group right over here, and I thought it would be fun to also use to do the same thing, but use the systematic name. So, in the last video, we called this isobu, but if we wanted to do it systematically, we would look at this group.

We would start at where it is attached to the main backbone, and we would think about the longest chain of carbons from there. So if we start there, we can get one, two, three carbons. So if we're dealing with three carbons, then this is going to be a propy group, and we would number it one, two, three.

And we see on the two carbon of the propy group, the two carbon of the propy group, we have a one carbon group right over here. So this is a methyl group branching off of the two carbon of the propy group. So we could call this; we could call this thing the systematic name. Instead of calling it isobu, we could call it two methyl. That's the methyl group right over there.

So let me write this down: two, two methyl propy, two methyl propyl, two methyl propy, and so this is the systematic name. And of course, there's two of them. This is a two methyl propyl right over here. Instead of an isobu, we'll call it two methyl propyl, and this is another two methyl propyl.

So instead of writing the 57 di-isob here, we can instead substitute that with the systematic name. So let's do that. Let me copy and paste everything else that comes before it. So let me copy, copy, and paste it. Whoops, whoops, I'm in the wrong layer of my program.

Let me go one layer down, so let me copy and paste it again. Copy and paste. There we go. So I got that part, but now I'm going to write this part differently. So we still have stuff. It's still on the five carbon and the seven carbon of our main chain, so five, seven.

And we have two of them, but when we're doing systematic naming, we won't say di this thing. Instead, we say bis. So five, five, seven B. That says that, hey, we got two of what I'm about to say, B this thing.

So let me copy. That's in a different layer. Let me copy and let me paste that B this stuff right over here. And then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and we are done. We have named it systematically as well.

More Articles

View All
6 WORST Villains EVER!
Vsauce. Michael here today with a special video. It’s a Skype conversation I had with Newt from Underbelly, where he teaches me about six actual villains from real comic books that are really, really lame. He’s joined by a bunch of ladies from Underbelly,…
Is the European Union Worth It Or Should We End It?
Do you think the European Union is worth it? Or should we end it? Many people feel a strong disconnect with the EU, while others praise its achievements. Everything considered: Is its existence good or bad for Europeans? Since it looks like the UK is leav…
5 Financial Habits To Do Before 30
But you want to immune confidence and basically say to me with your eyes, “I’m ready to rumble.” You want a rock? Bring it on! I can tell right there from the aura, the vibe. You haven’t even said a word yet, and I know right there if you’re a winner or a…
How Was Video Invented?
[Click] [High-pitched CRT TV noise] Film is a very straightforward technology. It just involves taking a two-dimensional image and focusing it onto a two-dimensional piece of film, and there you have a photo. But video, and by that, I mean moving electron…
Second partial derivative test example, part 1
So one common type of problem that you see in a number of multivariable calculus classes will say something to the effect of the following: find and classify all of the critical points of, and then you’ll insert some kind of multivariable function. So fi…
Definite integral involving natural log | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Let’s now take the definite integral from 2 to 4 of (6 + x^2) over (x^3) dx. At first, this might seem pretty daunting. I have this rational expression, but if we just rewrite this, it might jump out at you how this could be a little bit simpler. So, thi…