yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Naming two isobutyl groups systematically | Organic chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

In the last video, we named this molecule using the common names for this group right over here, and I thought it would be fun to also use to do the same thing, but use the systematic name. So, in the last video, we called this isobu, but if we wanted to do it systematically, we would look at this group.

We would start at where it is attached to the main backbone, and we would think about the longest chain of carbons from there. So if we start there, we can get one, two, three carbons. So if we're dealing with three carbons, then this is going to be a propy group, and we would number it one, two, three.

And we see on the two carbon of the propy group, the two carbon of the propy group, we have a one carbon group right over here. So this is a methyl group branching off of the two carbon of the propy group. So we could call this; we could call this thing the systematic name. Instead of calling it isobu, we could call it two methyl. That's the methyl group right over there.

So let me write this down: two, two methyl propy, two methyl propyl, two methyl propy, and so this is the systematic name. And of course, there's two of them. This is a two methyl propyl right over here. Instead of an isobu, we'll call it two methyl propyl, and this is another two methyl propyl.

So instead of writing the 57 di-isob here, we can instead substitute that with the systematic name. So let's do that. Let me copy and paste everything else that comes before it. So let me copy, copy, and paste it. Whoops, whoops, I'm in the wrong layer of my program.

Let me go one layer down, so let me copy and paste it again. Copy and paste. There we go. So I got that part, but now I'm going to write this part differently. So we still have stuff. It's still on the five carbon and the seven carbon of our main chain, so five, seven.

And we have two of them, but when we're doing systematic naming, we won't say di this thing. Instead, we say bis. So five, five, seven B. That says that, hey, we got two of what I'm about to say, B this thing.

So let me copy. That's in a different layer. Let me copy and let me paste that B this stuff right over here. And then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and then, of course, we have cyclo-octane, and we are done. We have named it systematically as well.

More Articles

View All
2011 Calculus AB Free Response #1 parts b c d | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
Alright, now let’s tackle Part B. Find the average velocity of the particle for the time period from zero is less than or equal to T is less than or equal to 6. So our average velocity, that’s just going to be our change in position, which we could view …
Filming The Queendoms | National Geographic
My name is Aaron Rainey. I’m a wildlife camera woman, and for the past two and a half years, I’ve been filming wildlife around the globe for the series “Queens.” Every individual connects with nature in their own way, and using a camera can be a way to ex…
The Deadliest Virus on Earth
In the 1970s, thousands of Chickenheads rained from the sky in Europe, making foxes and other wildlife confused and very happy. Why? They were filled with a vaccine to fight the deadliest virus known to humanity. Since the 1930s, a rabies epidemic had bee…
Warren Buffett: When to Sell a Stock
The question I want to answer in this video is probably the single most difficult question in all of investing: When is the perfect time to sell a stock? Countless books have been written and videos have been made on when the right time to buy a stock is.…
Building Product, Talking to Users, and Growing with Adora Cheung (How to Start a Startup 2014: 4)
Thanks for having me! So
Rounding whole numbers: missing digit | Math | 4th grade | Khan Academy
What digits could replace the question mark in the hundreds place to make this statement true? 4,000 question mark hundreds 29 rounds to 5,000 if we round to the nearest thousand. So we want a number whose nearest thousand is 5,000. It’s closer to 5,000 …