yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Who is God? One religion answers this question better than the others. | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

There’s a cognitive psychologist by the name of Justin Barrett who did a series of really fascinating studies about the way in which people think about God. He asked a group of devoutly religious people—Muslims, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus—he basically gave them a form to fill out about the ways in which they think about the divine.

And for the most part what he found was that they answered in theologically correct ways when talking about God as being, say, omniscient or omnipresent. But then he began to engage the same subjects in conversation. He asked them to start describing in regular language how they think about God.

And what he discovered is that almost every single person, when forced to start talking about God, violated those core theological principles of God being, for instance, omnipresent and omniscient. In fact, what he discovered is that the more they talked about God, the more it sounded like they were describing some person that they met on the street.

And this goes to a fundamental aspect about the way that we think about the divine, whether we are ourselves believers or not. And that is that, unconsciously, we can’t help but to imagine God as essentially a divine version of ourselves.

When we conceive of God we unconsciously, innately, impose upon God our own personality, our own virtues, our own vices, our own strengths, our own weaknesses. We project upon God our own biases and bigotries. We implant in God human characteristics, human personality, human desires all along with superhuman powers.

And so, as a result, what we really do—again, whether we’re aware of it or not—is we divinize ourselves. If you believe in God then what you believe in is something that is, by definition, utterly unhuman.

And so the question becomes: how do you talk about that thing, how do you think about that thing, how do you form a relationship with something that is utterly unhuman? Well, the way you do so is by humanizing that thing.

In fact, the entire history of human spirituality can be viewed as one long, intimately linked and remarkably cohesive narrative in which human beings increasingly humanize the divine. Until, of course, in the person of Jesus, God literally becomes a human being.

That, I think more than anything else, explains why Christianity is the most successful religion in the world because, in a way, it scratches an unconscious itch that we all have. Our brains work in such a way that we are compelled to conceive of God in human terms.

It’s an impulse that we’re born with, it goes back deep in our human evolution. What Christianity says is: God is not just humanlike, God is literally a human being.

And imagine how appealing that notion is because if you want to think about God, you know, it’s an impossible task. It’s so difficult to conceive of something like God. And what Christianity says is that it’s not that hard, actually.

You want to know what God is like? Imagine the most perfect person. Perfectly good. Perfectly compassionate. Perfectly sinless. That’s God. That’s a pretty easy thing to imagine.

More Articles

View All
Economies and diseconomies of scale | APⓇ Microeconomics | Khan Academy
In the last video, we were able to construct here in red this long run average total cost curve based on connecting the minimum points or the bottoms of the u’s of our various short run average total cost curves. Each of those short run average total cost…
Jeremy Rossmann of Make School on Income Share Agreements and the Future of College
Okay, Jeremy Rossmann, welcome to the podcast! Jeremy: Glad to be here! Interviewer: You are one of the cofounders of Make School. So, for those who don’t know, what is Make School? Jeremy: Make School is a new college in San Francisco. We offer a bach…
State checks on the judicial branch | US government and civics | Khan Academy
In previous videos, we had talked about the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy versus Ferguson, which is a good one to know in general if you’re studying United States history and/or United States government. But this is where we got the principle of separate…
Generalizabilty of survey results example | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
Niketi took a random sample of 10 countries to study fertility rate and life expectancy. She noticed a strong negative linear relationship between those variables in the sample data. Here is computer output from a least squares regression analysis for usi…
Watchers of the Land | Short Film Showcase | National Geographic
[Music] And you can’t ever lose your history or your stories; otherwise, you’ll lose who you are. It’s the Den way to pass on your teachings to younger [Music] people. A lot has changed since the 50s, and now that we do have a say, you know, we’re going t…
Michael Reeves Just Ruined Investing
Hey guys, so we gotta have a serious talk. Just recently, Michael Reeves made a complete mockery of the entire finance community by using a stock-picking goldfish to beat the market, and it worked! Somehow, the guy who builds beer-peeing robots was able …