yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Normative and positive statements | Basic economics concepts | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is discuss the difference between normative statements and positive statements, and you'll see these words used usually in an economic context, sometimes a philosophical one.

A normative statement is one that really is a matter of opinion, maybe a matter of ethics, something that someone thinks is how the world should be, while a positive statement is something that doesn't necessarily have to be true, but it's something that can be tested. So what we're going to do in this video is look at a bunch of statements around economics and think about whether they would be classified as normative statements—things that are opinions, that are a matter of ethics or morals—or whether they are positive statements—things that can be tested.

So let's look at our first statement. This says, "Paying people who aren't working, even though they could work, is wrong and unfair." So regardless of whether or not you agree with this statement, is it a normative statement or positive statement? Well, the fact that someone's saying it's wrong and it's unfair, this is pretty clearly a matter of opinion. So this would be a normative statement. You can't test whether this is wrong or unfair; you would just have to believe that it is wrong and unfair.

Now let's look at another statement. "Programs like welfare reduce the incentive for people to work." Is this a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, it might feel a little normative; it might feel like this is an opinion, but it actually can be tested. You could institute some welfare program on some small scale and compare it to a comparable place where there isn't a welfare program and see what it does for incentives to work. You survey people; you see how many people work in one situation or another. It might be a false statement; it might be a true statement. But either way, it actually can be tested, so this would be a positive statement.

So I'll put it in this category right over here. This is a positive statement.

All right, let's look at another one. This says, "Raising taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs grows the economy." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this can be tested. It might be true; it might be false. Maybe your test is even inconclusive, but it can be tested. You could try to run a simulation; you could look at case studies of countries that did do this and see what happens to their economy versus ones that didn't do it.

So this is, even though it looks like something that someone who favors raising taxes on the wealthy—maybe out of fairness arguments—something that they would say, this statement itself is not normative. The statement can be tested, so this is a positive statement. A good giveaway for a normative statement is if it said something like, "It is fair to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs." That would have been a normative statement or "We should do this," that would have been a normative statement.

But here, this is something that's testable.

Now the next statement: "Raising taxes on the wealthy slows economic growth." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this might feel like someone who is against raising taxes, who thinks it's unfair to raise taxes on the wealthy—something that they would say—but the statement itself can actually be tested. So this is also a positive statement, even though in some ways it's the opposite statement as the one that we just did. Because once again, we could look at countries that did this and countries that didn't do this; we could run a computer simulation to try to understand whether the statement is true.

Now let's do one last statement. This says, "The government should raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for helping the poor." Is this normative or positive? Well, in this situation, the word "should" is a pretty big giveaway. Should or it's fair/unfair—this is someone's opinion. It's not something that's testable; you can't test whether this statement is right or wrong. It's based on do you believe ethically or morally that this is true? And so this is a normative statement, so I'll put it in the normative column.

So big picture, these words normative and positive—these are fancy words, but all they mean is normative is a matter of morals or opinion and not can't really be tested, while a positive statement, whether they're right or wrong or whether you agree or disagree with them, these are things that in theory could be tested.

More Articles

View All
How did Russia begin? | 1450 - Present | AP US History | Khan Academy
What we’re going to talk about in this video are the origins of the Russian people, and in particular, we’re going to talk about the eastern Slavs, whom not just modern Russians, but also Ukrainians and Belarusians view as their ancestors. So, let’s thin…
A Senegalese Wrestler Trains to Become the ‘King of the Arena’ | Short Film Showcase
[Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] See the near their products a little veneer aficionado. My killer panel is the faucet, the more the electrons, you know, lon. Hello class, the fair loves fatality. [Music] Side [Music] Hopefully someone will own my business…
YC Startup Talks: Understanding Equity with Jordan Gonen, CEO & Co-founder of Compound
[Music] Well, thank you so much for the kind introduction. Um, it’s really great to meet everyone. Um, I’m Jordan, I’m one of Compound’s founders, and today I’m going to start by talking to you all about my hatred of personal finance. Um, I helped start C…
YC SUS: Kat Mañalac and Eric Migicovsky discuss Week 2 SUS Lectures
Good morning everyone, and good evening. It could be anywhere actually. I’d like to start somewhere. My name is Eric, and I’m the facilitator, of course, facilitator here at Startup School. It’s a pleasure to be joined by Kat. “Hi everyone, I’m Kat, a pa…
A Conversation About Crypto-currencies and ICOs with Andy Bromberg
Today is Thursday, which usually means that Adora or myself sit up here with someone notable and have a hopefully interesting conversation. The someone notable we have today is Andy Bromberg, my friend and the president and co-founder of CoinList, which i…
The US Constitution | Period 3: 1754-1800 | AP US History | Khan Academy
In the last video, we discussed the Great Compromise made at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, where delegates who were trying to craft a new governmental system for the United States agreed on how the legislative branch of the government would be se…