yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Normative and positive statements | Basic economics concepts | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is discuss the difference between normative statements and positive statements, and you'll see these words used usually in an economic context, sometimes a philosophical one.

A normative statement is one that really is a matter of opinion, maybe a matter of ethics, something that someone thinks is how the world should be, while a positive statement is something that doesn't necessarily have to be true, but it's something that can be tested. So what we're going to do in this video is look at a bunch of statements around economics and think about whether they would be classified as normative statements—things that are opinions, that are a matter of ethics or morals—or whether they are positive statements—things that can be tested.

So let's look at our first statement. This says, "Paying people who aren't working, even though they could work, is wrong and unfair." So regardless of whether or not you agree with this statement, is it a normative statement or positive statement? Well, the fact that someone's saying it's wrong and it's unfair, this is pretty clearly a matter of opinion. So this would be a normative statement. You can't test whether this is wrong or unfair; you would just have to believe that it is wrong and unfair.

Now let's look at another statement. "Programs like welfare reduce the incentive for people to work." Is this a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, it might feel a little normative; it might feel like this is an opinion, but it actually can be tested. You could institute some welfare program on some small scale and compare it to a comparable place where there isn't a welfare program and see what it does for incentives to work. You survey people; you see how many people work in one situation or another. It might be a false statement; it might be a true statement. But either way, it actually can be tested, so this would be a positive statement.

So I'll put it in this category right over here. This is a positive statement.

All right, let's look at another one. This says, "Raising taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs grows the economy." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this can be tested. It might be true; it might be false. Maybe your test is even inconclusive, but it can be tested. You could try to run a simulation; you could look at case studies of countries that did do this and see what happens to their economy versus ones that didn't do it.

So this is, even though it looks like something that someone who favors raising taxes on the wealthy—maybe out of fairness arguments—something that they would say, this statement itself is not normative. The statement can be tested, so this is a positive statement. A good giveaway for a normative statement is if it said something like, "It is fair to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs." That would have been a normative statement or "We should do this," that would have been a normative statement.

But here, this is something that's testable.

Now the next statement: "Raising taxes on the wealthy slows economic growth." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this might feel like someone who is against raising taxes, who thinks it's unfair to raise taxes on the wealthy—something that they would say—but the statement itself can actually be tested. So this is also a positive statement, even though in some ways it's the opposite statement as the one that we just did. Because once again, we could look at countries that did this and countries that didn't do this; we could run a computer simulation to try to understand whether the statement is true.

Now let's do one last statement. This says, "The government should raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for helping the poor." Is this normative or positive? Well, in this situation, the word "should" is a pretty big giveaway. Should or it's fair/unfair—this is someone's opinion. It's not something that's testable; you can't test whether this statement is right or wrong. It's based on do you believe ethically or morally that this is true? And so this is a normative statement, so I'll put it in the normative column.

So big picture, these words normative and positive—these are fancy words, but all they mean is normative is a matter of morals or opinion and not can't really be tested, while a positive statement, whether they're right or wrong or whether you agree or disagree with them, these are things that in theory could be tested.

More Articles

View All
Strategies for multiplying multiples of 10, 100 and 1000
Do in this video is think about multiplying our strategies for multiplying numbers that are expressed in terms of hundreds or thousands or tens. So we see an example right over here: we have 800 times 400. Now, like always, I encourage you to pause this …
The Stock Market JUST Went From BAD To WORSE | How To Prepare
All right, so this is getting out of control. First, we had Facebook plummet 26% in a single day. Then we had Netflix fall 35% overnight as they lost subscribers. Shortly after, Walmart drops 25% on missed earnings. And then the nail in the coffin: Tarjay…
Sample statistic bias worked example | Sampling distributions | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
We’re told Alejandro was curious if sample median was an unbiased estimator of population median. He placed ping pong balls numbered from 0 to 32, so I guess that would be what, 33 ping pong balls in a drum and mixed them well. Note that the median of th…
Curvature formula, part 4
So, we’ve been talking about curvature, and this means, uh, you’ve got some sort of parametric curve that you might think of as parameterized by a vector-valued function s of t. Curvature is supposed to measure just how much this curve actually curves. So…
Misconceptions About Falling Objects
Let’s say Jack holds both balls above his head and then he drops them at exactly the same time. What do you expect to see? Well, they’re going to hit the ground at the same time. I expect them to both land at the same time. The same time, same time! This…
Developing an American colonial identity | Period 2: 1607-1754 | AP US History | Khan Academy
[Instructor] The first long-term English colony in North America was established at Jamestown in 1607. No one expected that it would last very long. It was intended to be a get-rich-quick scheme for its investors, who hoped they would find gold in the swa…