yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Normative and positive statements | Basic economics concepts | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is discuss the difference between normative statements and positive statements, and you'll see these words used usually in an economic context, sometimes a philosophical one.

A normative statement is one that really is a matter of opinion, maybe a matter of ethics, something that someone thinks is how the world should be, while a positive statement is something that doesn't necessarily have to be true, but it's something that can be tested. So what we're going to do in this video is look at a bunch of statements around economics and think about whether they would be classified as normative statements—things that are opinions, that are a matter of ethics or morals—or whether they are positive statements—things that can be tested.

So let's look at our first statement. This says, "Paying people who aren't working, even though they could work, is wrong and unfair." So regardless of whether or not you agree with this statement, is it a normative statement or positive statement? Well, the fact that someone's saying it's wrong and it's unfair, this is pretty clearly a matter of opinion. So this would be a normative statement. You can't test whether this is wrong or unfair; you would just have to believe that it is wrong and unfair.

Now let's look at another statement. "Programs like welfare reduce the incentive for people to work." Is this a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, it might feel a little normative; it might feel like this is an opinion, but it actually can be tested. You could institute some welfare program on some small scale and compare it to a comparable place where there isn't a welfare program and see what it does for incentives to work. You survey people; you see how many people work in one situation or another. It might be a false statement; it might be a true statement. But either way, it actually can be tested, so this would be a positive statement.

So I'll put it in this category right over here. This is a positive statement.

All right, let's look at another one. This says, "Raising taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs grows the economy." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this can be tested. It might be true; it might be false. Maybe your test is even inconclusive, but it can be tested. You could try to run a simulation; you could look at case studies of countries that did do this and see what happens to their economy versus ones that didn't do it.

So this is, even though it looks like something that someone who favors raising taxes on the wealthy—maybe out of fairness arguments—something that they would say, this statement itself is not normative. The statement can be tested, so this is a positive statement. A good giveaway for a normative statement is if it said something like, "It is fair to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs." That would have been a normative statement or "We should do this," that would have been a normative statement.

But here, this is something that's testable.

Now the next statement: "Raising taxes on the wealthy slows economic growth." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this might feel like someone who is against raising taxes, who thinks it's unfair to raise taxes on the wealthy—something that they would say—but the statement itself can actually be tested. So this is also a positive statement, even though in some ways it's the opposite statement as the one that we just did. Because once again, we could look at countries that did this and countries that didn't do this; we could run a computer simulation to try to understand whether the statement is true.

Now let's do one last statement. This says, "The government should raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for helping the poor." Is this normative or positive? Well, in this situation, the word "should" is a pretty big giveaway. Should or it's fair/unfair—this is someone's opinion. It's not something that's testable; you can't test whether this statement is right or wrong. It's based on do you believe ethically or morally that this is true? And so this is a normative statement, so I'll put it in the normative column.

So big picture, these words normative and positive—these are fancy words, but all they mean is normative is a matter of morals or opinion and not can't really be tested, while a positive statement, whether they're right or wrong or whether you agree or disagree with them, these are things that in theory could be tested.

More Articles

View All
The US Literally Cannot Repay Its National Debt.
The US national debt currently sits at $34.8 trillion. For context, the population of the US is currently around 333 million people, so that equates to over $100,000 of national debt per person. But the worrying statistic is not the absolute value; rather…
The New Era of Discovery | Explorers Fest
[Applause] That’s 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9. We have ignition sequence start. The engines are on. 4, 7:51 a.m. There’s a fire. [Music] [Applause] And over an enemy, that two-zero-niner. [Applause] [Music] How does it feel up there? Oh yeah, look at that p…
The Last Days of the Romanovs | National Geographic
I think it’s a big tragedy, big tragedy for the country and for the world. For 300 years, the Romanovs ruled Russia as czars—loved, feared, revered, respected. But all too often, those who fly highest fall furthest. World War One brought Russia to revolut…
Remembering the Battle of Mogadishu | No Man Left Behind
My role in that battle was a team leader with one of the platoons that went in on the air assault. I went and originally on the helicopters. When you make it out of something where others didn’t, you’re going to spend the rest of your life thanking the pe…
Why Do People Act Badly? | The Story of God
In small-scale societies and ancestral communities, there were only a couple of hundred individuals. It was relatively easy to keep tabs on one another, and that was really important because social reputation matters. The problem is that the larger the s…
Introduction to polynomial division
Earlier in your algebraic careers, you learned how to multiply polynomials. So, for example, if we had (x + 2) times (4x + 5), we learned that this is the same thing as really doing the distributive property twice. You could multiply (x) times (4x) to ge…