yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Normative and positive statements | Basic economics concepts | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is discuss the difference between normative statements and positive statements, and you'll see these words used usually in an economic context, sometimes a philosophical one.

A normative statement is one that really is a matter of opinion, maybe a matter of ethics, something that someone thinks is how the world should be, while a positive statement is something that doesn't necessarily have to be true, but it's something that can be tested. So what we're going to do in this video is look at a bunch of statements around economics and think about whether they would be classified as normative statements—things that are opinions, that are a matter of ethics or morals—or whether they are positive statements—things that can be tested.

So let's look at our first statement. This says, "Paying people who aren't working, even though they could work, is wrong and unfair." So regardless of whether or not you agree with this statement, is it a normative statement or positive statement? Well, the fact that someone's saying it's wrong and it's unfair, this is pretty clearly a matter of opinion. So this would be a normative statement. You can't test whether this is wrong or unfair; you would just have to believe that it is wrong and unfair.

Now let's look at another statement. "Programs like welfare reduce the incentive for people to work." Is this a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, it might feel a little normative; it might feel like this is an opinion, but it actually can be tested. You could institute some welfare program on some small scale and compare it to a comparable place where there isn't a welfare program and see what it does for incentives to work. You survey people; you see how many people work in one situation or another. It might be a false statement; it might be a true statement. But either way, it actually can be tested, so this would be a positive statement.

So I'll put it in this category right over here. This is a positive statement.

All right, let's look at another one. This says, "Raising taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs grows the economy." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this can be tested. It might be true; it might be false. Maybe your test is even inconclusive, but it can be tested. You could try to run a simulation; you could look at case studies of countries that did do this and see what happens to their economy versus ones that didn't do it.

So this is, even though it looks like something that someone who favors raising taxes on the wealthy—maybe out of fairness arguments—something that they would say, this statement itself is not normative. The statement can be tested, so this is a positive statement. A good giveaway for a normative statement is if it said something like, "It is fair to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs." That would have been a normative statement or "We should do this," that would have been a normative statement.

But here, this is something that's testable.

Now the next statement: "Raising taxes on the wealthy slows economic growth." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this might feel like someone who is against raising taxes, who thinks it's unfair to raise taxes on the wealthy—something that they would say—but the statement itself can actually be tested. So this is also a positive statement, even though in some ways it's the opposite statement as the one that we just did. Because once again, we could look at countries that did this and countries that didn't do this; we could run a computer simulation to try to understand whether the statement is true.

Now let's do one last statement. This says, "The government should raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for helping the poor." Is this normative or positive? Well, in this situation, the word "should" is a pretty big giveaway. Should or it's fair/unfair—this is someone's opinion. It's not something that's testable; you can't test whether this statement is right or wrong. It's based on do you believe ethically or morally that this is true? And so this is a normative statement, so I'll put it in the normative column.

So big picture, these words normative and positive—these are fancy words, but all they mean is normative is a matter of morals or opinion and not can't really be tested, while a positive statement, whether they're right or wrong or whether you agree or disagree with them, these are things that in theory could be tested.

More Articles

View All
Basic derivative rules: find the error | Derivative rules | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
So we have two examples here of someone trying to find the derivative of an expression. On the left-hand side, it says Avery tried to find the derivative of 7 - 5x using basic differentiation rules; here is her work. On the right-hand side, it says Hann…
The Cosmic Connectome | Cosmos: Possible Worlds
[Horn honking] [Siren wailing] A city is like a brain. It develops from a small center and slowly grows and changes, leaving many old parts still functioning. New York can’t afford to suspend its water supply or its transportation system while they’re bei…
Buy REAL Dino Teeth! ... and more! LÜT #20
An R2-D2 pepper mill and cologne that makes you smell like Play-doh. It’s episode 20 of LÜT. This wallet looks like a lot of hundreds, and these bars of soap from ThinkGeek contain caffeine, really. Each shower you take delivers the same as a cuppa coffe…
Meet The Real Estate Investor With 102 Tenants
Lots of you guys, that’s Graham here. So, as some of you may remember, two years ago I flew all the way to London, Ontario, Canada, to meet one of the most frugal and strategic real estate investors out there, Matt McKeever. He began his career doing the …
Eyes on Orcas | Continent 7: Antarctica
[music playing] [splash] [shout] NARRATOR: After a season of frustration– BEN SHARP: Right there. NARRATOR: –Regina and her team have a killer whale in sight. BEN SHARP: He’s coming towards the edge. NARRATOR: Now, they just need it to be in range. …
Presidential precedents of George Washington | US government and civics | Khan Academy
Hi, this is S, and I’m here with Jeffrey Rosen, who’s the head of the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. In the first video, we did an overview of Article Two of the Constitution, which covers the powers of the presidency. Now we’re going to ju…