yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Normative and positive statements | Basic economics concepts | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy


4m read
·Nov 11, 2024

What we're going to do in this video is discuss the difference between normative statements and positive statements, and you'll see these words used usually in an economic context, sometimes a philosophical one.

A normative statement is one that really is a matter of opinion, maybe a matter of ethics, something that someone thinks is how the world should be, while a positive statement is something that doesn't necessarily have to be true, but it's something that can be tested. So what we're going to do in this video is look at a bunch of statements around economics and think about whether they would be classified as normative statements—things that are opinions, that are a matter of ethics or morals—or whether they are positive statements—things that can be tested.

So let's look at our first statement. This says, "Paying people who aren't working, even though they could work, is wrong and unfair." So regardless of whether or not you agree with this statement, is it a normative statement or positive statement? Well, the fact that someone's saying it's wrong and it's unfair, this is pretty clearly a matter of opinion. So this would be a normative statement. You can't test whether this is wrong or unfair; you would just have to believe that it is wrong and unfair.

Now let's look at another statement. "Programs like welfare reduce the incentive for people to work." Is this a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, it might feel a little normative; it might feel like this is an opinion, but it actually can be tested. You could institute some welfare program on some small scale and compare it to a comparable place where there isn't a welfare program and see what it does for incentives to work. You survey people; you see how many people work in one situation or another. It might be a false statement; it might be a true statement. But either way, it actually can be tested, so this would be a positive statement.

So I'll put it in this category right over here. This is a positive statement.

All right, let's look at another one. This says, "Raising taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs grows the economy." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this can be tested. It might be true; it might be false. Maybe your test is even inconclusive, but it can be tested. You could try to run a simulation; you could look at case studies of countries that did do this and see what happens to their economy versus ones that didn't do it.

So this is, even though it looks like something that someone who favors raising taxes on the wealthy—maybe out of fairness arguments—something that they would say, this statement itself is not normative. The statement can be tested, so this is a positive statement. A good giveaway for a normative statement is if it said something like, "It is fair to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for government programs." That would have been a normative statement or "We should do this," that would have been a normative statement.

But here, this is something that's testable.

Now the next statement: "Raising taxes on the wealthy slows economic growth." Is that a normative statement or a positive statement? Well, once again, this might feel like someone who is against raising taxes, who thinks it's unfair to raise taxes on the wealthy—something that they would say—but the statement itself can actually be tested. So this is also a positive statement, even though in some ways it's the opposite statement as the one that we just did. Because once again, we could look at countries that did this and countries that didn't do this; we could run a computer simulation to try to understand whether the statement is true.

Now let's do one last statement. This says, "The government should raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for helping the poor." Is this normative or positive? Well, in this situation, the word "should" is a pretty big giveaway. Should or it's fair/unfair—this is someone's opinion. It's not something that's testable; you can't test whether this statement is right or wrong. It's based on do you believe ethically or morally that this is true? And so this is a normative statement, so I'll put it in the normative column.

So big picture, these words normative and positive—these are fancy words, but all they mean is normative is a matter of morals or opinion and not can't really be tested, while a positive statement, whether they're right or wrong or whether you agree or disagree with them, these are things that in theory could be tested.

More Articles

View All
Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger on How to Calculate Future Earnings
I have a question. When you’re valuing the companies and you discount back the future earnings, you talked about how many years out you generally go. If you don’t go out a general number of years, how do you arrive at that time period? Well, that’s a ver…
Black Holes Explained – From Birth to Death
Black holes are one of the strangest things in existence. They don’t seem to make any sense at all. Where do they come from… and what happens if you fall into one? Stars are incredibly massive collections of mostly hydrogen atoms that collapsed from enor…
10 THINGS YOU SHOULD DO EVERY MORNING (STOIC MORNING ROUTINE) | STOICISM INSIGHTS
Welcome back, Stoicism Insights family, it’s great to have you here with us again. Today, we’re delving into a topic that’s close to the heart of Stoic philosophy, the art of crafting the perfect morning routine. But this isn’t just any morning routine, i…
The truth behind jet lag...
The thing that everybody thinks is jet lag. People think it’s because of the time zone change; it really is not the time zone change. It’s the cabin altitude of the plane. If you ever go skiing and you go to a place that’s at 2500 or 3,000 M, and the fir…
Miracles and inductive inference
Atheists and these alike are both affected by the problem of induction. Frustratingly, there’s no rational reason to think that the future will look like the best. The reason we do have the idea that it will, to use Hume’s term, is merely the result of ha…
Adjective order | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
So, Grom Marians, if you’re a native English speaker, the phrase “French old white house” might seem a little weird to you. If you’re not a native English speaker, it might not. This is something that I didn’t really know about before I started preparing …