yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Philosophy's Biggest Questions


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

You've probably heard of the trolley problem, especially if you're at all interested in philosophy or ethics. Lately, it's been a subject of discussion when discussing autonomous cars and was referenced explicitly in the show "The Good Place." Some people think it's a fun moral thought experiment to discuss in a group; others feel it's a good ethical workout to prepare for real-world ethical dilemmas.

But what if the trolley problem has a problem of its own? Well, before diving into the problem with the trolley problem, we've got one crucial thing to do: drive the trolley.

The trolley problem goes like this: you're driving a trolley along a track when all of a sudden the brakes just stop working. If you stay on the track in front of you, you'll run over a group of five people standing on the track. But you have the option of pulling a switch and directing the trolley onto another track with just a single person standing on the track. You have to choose between killing five people or one person. What is the morally correct thing to do? Do you flip the switch to save five people and kill one, or do you leave the switch alone, kill five, and leave one unharmed?

The trolley problem is a widely used moral thought experiment, especially in beginner philosophy classes. The problem is often used to illustrate two branches of ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialists focus on the consequences of an action, while deontologists emphasize a sense of moral duty.

Utilitarianism is a prime example of consequentialism. Philosophers John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham considered the moral value of an action based on the outcome and whether it contributed to the greater good. If you were to consider the trolley problem from the consequentialist perspective, you'd quickly pull that switch to take just one life instead of the group of five. When more people get to live, that benefits the greater good.

On the other hand, a manual "Kidney" ethics challenges you to universalize a principle or maxim to see if it works regardless of circumstance. His classic example is lying: can you imagine universalized lying as a maxim? If everyone lied all the time, you couldn't trust anything anyone said. Kant would suggest that lying is therefore immoral. From a deontological perspective, the trolley problem is more challenging.

Could you universalize your principle of killing someone to save others? Imagine one person had five kidneys that could save the lives of five people. However, the kidney owner would have to be killed against their will to attain the organs. Killing the kidney owner instinctually feels wrong compared to flipping the switch in the trolley problem. It doesn't seem like you could universalize this principle of killing one to save five others.

The trolley problem is an excellent way to learn about these two systems of ethics, but does the thought experiment actually help with moral decisions? Do any imagined circumstances help with real-world moral decisions? The trolley problem allows us to consider the interaction between ethics, psychology, and logic.

To fully appreciate thought experiments like this, you need to have a good understanding of concepts like math, probability, and science. I know these can be really difficult and expensive to learn if you take the traditional approach, but you don't have to. Thanks to Brilliant.org, the sponsor of today's episode, Brilliant is a platform that allows you to learn by doing, with thousands of interactive lessons in math, data analysis, programming, and AI.

I love Brilliant and have been using it for years because of how easy it is to start learning. Thanks to their amazing mobile app and short, fun lessons, you can learn anywhere and in any short amount of time you have. Whether you're diving into a new topic or just doing a quick practice lesson, you can level up in just a few minutes right there on your phone.

This is what I spent time doing when I would have otherwise been doom scrolling on TikTok. And it's not just easy to use; Brilliant, as a learning platform, is also designed to be uniquely effective. Their first principles approach helps you build...

More Articles

View All
Michael Reeves Just Ruined Investing
Hey guys, so we gotta have a serious talk. Just recently, Michael Reeves made a complete mockery of the entire finance community by using a stock-picking goldfish to beat the market, and it worked! Somehow, the guy who builds beer-peeing robots was able …
Warren Buffett's BIG Warning for Investors (2021)
I would like to, uh, just go over two items that I would like particularly new entrants to the stock market to, uh, ponder just a bit before they try and do 30 or 40 trades a day, uh, in order to profit from what looks like a very, uh, easy game. So, uh, …
Neil deGrasse Tyson Demystifies Breakthroughs | Breakthrough
There’s a stereotype of discoveries and breakthroughs. The stereotype is: at one point you don’t know something, and then there’s a Eureka moment, and then you know something, and that’s a breakthrough. The very word itself implies some barrier through wh…
Kathryn Minshew at Female Founders Conference 2014
So next you’re gonna meet Kathryn Minshew. Fun fact, when she was a kid, Kathryn wanted to be Zorro. Now, Kathryn is founder and CEO of The Muse, a career platform and job discovery tool. Kathryn was part of the YC Winter 2012 batch. Please welcome Kathry…
7 STOIC SIGNS OF RELATIONSHIP INCOMPATIBILITY | STOICISM INSIGHTS
Welcome back to Stoicism Insights. Today we’re diving deep into the intricacies of relationships through the lens of Stoic philosophy. Have you ever wondered what signs might indicate a fundamental misalignment in your relationships? Stick around, because…
Three Incorrect Laws of Motion
Nearly 350 years ago, Isaac Newton came up with three laws of motion that govern how everything moves. There are three pretty famous laws of motion. And they’re not very complicated, but if I told them to you as clearly as I can, you would think that you’…