yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Philosophy's Biggest Questions


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

You've probably heard of the trolley problem, especially if you're at all interested in philosophy or ethics. Lately, it's been a subject of discussion when discussing autonomous cars and was referenced explicitly in the show "The Good Place." Some people think it's a fun moral thought experiment to discuss in a group; others feel it's a good ethical workout to prepare for real-world ethical dilemmas.

But what if the trolley problem has a problem of its own? Well, before diving into the problem with the trolley problem, we've got one crucial thing to do: drive the trolley.

The trolley problem goes like this: you're driving a trolley along a track when all of a sudden the brakes just stop working. If you stay on the track in front of you, you'll run over a group of five people standing on the track. But you have the option of pulling a switch and directing the trolley onto another track with just a single person standing on the track. You have to choose between killing five people or one person. What is the morally correct thing to do? Do you flip the switch to save five people and kill one, or do you leave the switch alone, kill five, and leave one unharmed?

The trolley problem is a widely used moral thought experiment, especially in beginner philosophy classes. The problem is often used to illustrate two branches of ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialists focus on the consequences of an action, while deontologists emphasize a sense of moral duty.

Utilitarianism is a prime example of consequentialism. Philosophers John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham considered the moral value of an action based on the outcome and whether it contributed to the greater good. If you were to consider the trolley problem from the consequentialist perspective, you'd quickly pull that switch to take just one life instead of the group of five. When more people get to live, that benefits the greater good.

On the other hand, a manual "Kidney" ethics challenges you to universalize a principle or maxim to see if it works regardless of circumstance. His classic example is lying: can you imagine universalized lying as a maxim? If everyone lied all the time, you couldn't trust anything anyone said. Kant would suggest that lying is therefore immoral. From a deontological perspective, the trolley problem is more challenging.

Could you universalize your principle of killing someone to save others? Imagine one person had five kidneys that could save the lives of five people. However, the kidney owner would have to be killed against their will to attain the organs. Killing the kidney owner instinctually feels wrong compared to flipping the switch in the trolley problem. It doesn't seem like you could universalize this principle of killing one to save five others.

The trolley problem is an excellent way to learn about these two systems of ethics, but does the thought experiment actually help with moral decisions? Do any imagined circumstances help with real-world moral decisions? The trolley problem allows us to consider the interaction between ethics, psychology, and logic.

To fully appreciate thought experiments like this, you need to have a good understanding of concepts like math, probability, and science. I know these can be really difficult and expensive to learn if you take the traditional approach, but you don't have to. Thanks to Brilliant.org, the sponsor of today's episode, Brilliant is a platform that allows you to learn by doing, with thousands of interactive lessons in math, data analysis, programming, and AI.

I love Brilliant and have been using it for years because of how easy it is to start learning. Thanks to their amazing mobile app and short, fun lessons, you can learn anywhere and in any short amount of time you have. Whether you're diving into a new topic or just doing a quick practice lesson, you can level up in just a few minutes right there on your phone.

This is what I spent time doing when I would have otherwise been doom scrolling on TikTok. And it's not just easy to use; Brilliant, as a learning platform, is also designed to be uniquely effective. Their first principles approach helps you build...

More Articles

View All
Peter Lynch: How to Invest During High Inflation
So we just got fresh inflation data a week or two ago and guess what? It showed that yet again the annual inflation rate has risen in the U.S. Inflation is now running at seven percent per year. We know that because of this inflation, Jerome Powell and th…
Worked example: distance and displacement from position-time graphs | AP Physics 1 | Khan Academy
In other videos, we’ve already talked about the difference between distance and displacement, and we also saw what it meant to plot position versus time. What we’re going to do in this video is use all of those skills. We’re going to look at position vers…
Operation Royal Wedding: St. George’s Chapel | National Geographic
Inside the jaw-dropping splendor of Windsor Castle, St. George’s Chapel is undergoing preparations for Prince Harry and Megan Marko’s nuptials. Charlotte Manley is responsible for the smooth running of the chapel, which, despite its age and grandeur, is v…
Hard Pill to Swallow | Badlands, Texas
Something was taken from Tringa that can’t be given back. I don’t think in my lifetime Tring was ever hit this hard. This was an atrocity; that’s a hell of a thing for a community to try and swallow. But they ain’t going to forget. Tony Flint just walked…
How POV affects readers | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! I want to talk to you today about point of view in literature and how it can shape what we as readers take away from a story. Now, we’ve talked about this in more basic terms before: Is a story in first, second, or third person? But I would…
How to Become Undefeatable (according to Seneca) | Stoic Philosophy
When Seneca claimed that the wise man is safe from injury, his friend Serenus asked: “What then? Will there be no one who will try to do an injury to the wise man?”. “Yes,” said Seneca, “they will try, but the injury will not reach him.” He argued that th…