yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Philosophy's Biggest Questions


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

You've probably heard of the trolley problem, especially if you're at all interested in philosophy or ethics. Lately, it's been a subject of discussion when discussing autonomous cars and was referenced explicitly in the show "The Good Place." Some people think it's a fun moral thought experiment to discuss in a group; others feel it's a good ethical workout to prepare for real-world ethical dilemmas.

But what if the trolley problem has a problem of its own? Well, before diving into the problem with the trolley problem, we've got one crucial thing to do: drive the trolley.

The trolley problem goes like this: you're driving a trolley along a track when all of a sudden the brakes just stop working. If you stay on the track in front of you, you'll run over a group of five people standing on the track. But you have the option of pulling a switch and directing the trolley onto another track with just a single person standing on the track. You have to choose between killing five people or one person. What is the morally correct thing to do? Do you flip the switch to save five people and kill one, or do you leave the switch alone, kill five, and leave one unharmed?

The trolley problem is a widely used moral thought experiment, especially in beginner philosophy classes. The problem is often used to illustrate two branches of ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialists focus on the consequences of an action, while deontologists emphasize a sense of moral duty.

Utilitarianism is a prime example of consequentialism. Philosophers John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham considered the moral value of an action based on the outcome and whether it contributed to the greater good. If you were to consider the trolley problem from the consequentialist perspective, you'd quickly pull that switch to take just one life instead of the group of five. When more people get to live, that benefits the greater good.

On the other hand, a manual "Kidney" ethics challenges you to universalize a principle or maxim to see if it works regardless of circumstance. His classic example is lying: can you imagine universalized lying as a maxim? If everyone lied all the time, you couldn't trust anything anyone said. Kant would suggest that lying is therefore immoral. From a deontological perspective, the trolley problem is more challenging.

Could you universalize your principle of killing someone to save others? Imagine one person had five kidneys that could save the lives of five people. However, the kidney owner would have to be killed against their will to attain the organs. Killing the kidney owner instinctually feels wrong compared to flipping the switch in the trolley problem. It doesn't seem like you could universalize this principle of killing one to save five others.

The trolley problem is an excellent way to learn about these two systems of ethics, but does the thought experiment actually help with moral decisions? Do any imagined circumstances help with real-world moral decisions? The trolley problem allows us to consider the interaction between ethics, psychology, and logic.

To fully appreciate thought experiments like this, you need to have a good understanding of concepts like math, probability, and science. I know these can be really difficult and expensive to learn if you take the traditional approach, but you don't have to. Thanks to Brilliant.org, the sponsor of today's episode, Brilliant is a platform that allows you to learn by doing, with thousands of interactive lessons in math, data analysis, programming, and AI.

I love Brilliant and have been using it for years because of how easy it is to start learning. Thanks to their amazing mobile app and short, fun lessons, you can learn anywhere and in any short amount of time you have. Whether you're diving into a new topic or just doing a quick practice lesson, you can level up in just a few minutes right there on your phone.

This is what I spent time doing when I would have otherwise been doom scrolling on TikTok. And it's not just easy to use; Brilliant, as a learning platform, is also designed to be uniquely effective. Their first principles approach helps you build...

More Articles

View All
ETHEREUM IS ABOUT TO TAKE OVER
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here. So, I think it’s no surprise that overall 2021 has been a breakthrough year in so many ways. Like, we now have a brain implant that translates thought to text with 94% accuracy, a new lithium metal battery technology tha…
The Fascinating Lives of Bleeding Heart Monkeys (Part 1) | Nat Geo Live
So National Geographic asked us here tonight to tell you about a day in the life of gelada monkeys and what it’s like to live alongside them. For the past decade, the vet and I have spent years living alongside this species in a unique kind of alpine out-…
What Makes Sugar-Free Gum Sweet? | Ingredients With George Zaidan (Episode 11)
Takes a lot more than just sugar to make gum sweet, so can I make my own gum sweetener from scratch without sugar? Hit the stuff inside your stuff. Ingredients; the ingredients in this popular gum are, and the ones responsible for flavor are. Now let’s d…
Beta decay | Physics | Khan Academy
Did you know that paper industries can use radioactivity to ensure consistent thickness throughout the paper? That’s right! But doesn’t it make you wonder how do you use radioactivity to do that? Well, let’s find out. If you have a very heavy nucleus, th…
These Birds Build Big Nests. It Doesn't End Well. | National Geographic
Ornithologists are helpful folk, and when they name a bird the sociable weaver, you can tell that it’s going to be a social creature and one that likes to weave large nests. Only the size of sparrows, these birds can build enormous nests, reaching 10 feet…
Intuition for why independence matters for variance of sum | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
So in previous videos, we talked about the claim that if I have two random variables, X and Y, that are independent, then the variance of the sum of those two random variables, or the difference of those two random variables, is going to be equal to the s…