yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Philosophy's Biggest Questions


3m read
·Nov 4, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

You've probably heard of the trolley problem, especially if you're at all interested in philosophy or ethics. Lately, it's been a subject of discussion when discussing autonomous cars and was referenced explicitly in the show "The Good Place." Some people think it's a fun moral thought experiment to discuss in a group; others feel it's a good ethical workout to prepare for real-world ethical dilemmas.

But what if the trolley problem has a problem of its own? Well, before diving into the problem with the trolley problem, we've got one crucial thing to do: drive the trolley.

The trolley problem goes like this: you're driving a trolley along a track when all of a sudden the brakes just stop working. If you stay on the track in front of you, you'll run over a group of five people standing on the track. But you have the option of pulling a switch and directing the trolley onto another track with just a single person standing on the track. You have to choose between killing five people or one person. What is the morally correct thing to do? Do you flip the switch to save five people and kill one, or do you leave the switch alone, kill five, and leave one unharmed?

The trolley problem is a widely used moral thought experiment, especially in beginner philosophy classes. The problem is often used to illustrate two branches of ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialists focus on the consequences of an action, while deontologists emphasize a sense of moral duty.

Utilitarianism is a prime example of consequentialism. Philosophers John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham considered the moral value of an action based on the outcome and whether it contributed to the greater good. If you were to consider the trolley problem from the consequentialist perspective, you'd quickly pull that switch to take just one life instead of the group of five. When more people get to live, that benefits the greater good.

On the other hand, a manual "Kidney" ethics challenges you to universalize a principle or maxim to see if it works regardless of circumstance. His classic example is lying: can you imagine universalized lying as a maxim? If everyone lied all the time, you couldn't trust anything anyone said. Kant would suggest that lying is therefore immoral. From a deontological perspective, the trolley problem is more challenging.

Could you universalize your principle of killing someone to save others? Imagine one person had five kidneys that could save the lives of five people. However, the kidney owner would have to be killed against their will to attain the organs. Killing the kidney owner instinctually feels wrong compared to flipping the switch in the trolley problem. It doesn't seem like you could universalize this principle of killing one to save five others.

The trolley problem is an excellent way to learn about these two systems of ethics, but does the thought experiment actually help with moral decisions? Do any imagined circumstances help with real-world moral decisions? The trolley problem allows us to consider the interaction between ethics, psychology, and logic.

To fully appreciate thought experiments like this, you need to have a good understanding of concepts like math, probability, and science. I know these can be really difficult and expensive to learn if you take the traditional approach, but you don't have to. Thanks to Brilliant.org, the sponsor of today's episode, Brilliant is a platform that allows you to learn by doing, with thousands of interactive lessons in math, data analysis, programming, and AI.

I love Brilliant and have been using it for years because of how easy it is to start learning. Thanks to their amazing mobile app and short, fun lessons, you can learn anywhere and in any short amount of time you have. Whether you're diving into a new topic or just doing a quick practice lesson, you can level up in just a few minutes right there on your phone.

This is what I spent time doing when I would have otherwise been doom scrolling on TikTok. And it's not just easy to use; Brilliant, as a learning platform, is also designed to be uniquely effective. Their first principles approach helps you build...

More Articles

View All
Abstinence-Only Sex Ed | Original Sin: Sex
By the 1990s in the U.S., most of the advances to public sex education made since the 50s are political roadkill. Late 90s, there is this increase in abstinence-only sex education. In 1993, the Southern Baptists asked American teens to put a ring on it a…
Introduction to frames of reference
I’d like to do in this video is talk about the notion of a frame of reference, and this is an introductory video. In future videos, we’ll go into a lot more depth. But a frame of reference is really the idea; it’s a point of view from which you are measu…
Probability of sample proportions example | Sampling distributions | AP Statistics | Khan Academy
We’re told suppose that 15% of the 1750 students at a school have experienced extreme levels of stress during the past month. A high school newspaper doesn’t know this figure, but they are curious what it is. So they decide to ask us a simple random sampl…
Introduction to remainders
We’re already somewhat familiar with the idea of division. If I were to say 8 divided by 2, you could think of that as 8 objects: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Divided into equal groups of two. So how many equal groups of two could you have? Well, you could hav…
Dividing by 0.1 and 0.01
Let’s say we’re trying to figure out what 2 divided by 1⁄10 is. So, pause this video and see if you can have a go at that. All right, now there’s a couple of ways that we could approach this. We could just try to think of everything in terms of tenths si…
Character change | Reading | Khan Academy
Hello readers! One of the wonderful things about stories when they’re given the room to grow and expand is the idea of character change or growth over time. Characters in stories are just like real people; they have the capacity to change, to make mistake…