yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

How Does A Wing Actually Work?


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Shh... I've snuck into minutephysics' studio to explain how a wing actually works.

Hang on, something doesn't feel right. Ah, that's better.

Now everyone knows that a wing generates lift due to its characteristic shape. Since air travels farther over top of the wing, it must go faster than the air underneath so that both streams meet up simultaneously at the trailing edge. And according to Bernoulli's principle, faster flowing air exerts less pressure than the slower air beneath the wing. This pressure difference creates an upward force -- lift. Job done. Right? Nope.

This simple explanation taught in many textbooks and classrooms has obvious problems. Like how could a plane fly upside down? Some planes, like the Wright brothers' had nearly flat wings. So presumably air would travel the same speed over both sides and there would be no lift. Plus, experiments show that air streams don't meet up at the back of the wing. Air over the top goes significantly faster, reaching the trailing edge first.

So how does a wing actually generate lift? Well, the key is the wing must deflect air downwards. This can be achieved using asymmetric or cambered air foils, or by increasing the angle of attack. Air under the wing is deflected down. And by the Coanda effect, air above the wing is guided along its surface and down as well. Since the air is slowed and deflected down by the wing, it pushes the wing up and back. Lift, and drag. This is in accordance with Newton's Third Law of Motion.

But hang on, if you can explain lift only using the deflection of air and Newton's laws, then the Bernoulli explanation must be completely wrong. Well, no, air over the top of the wing does go faster than air beneath, creating a pressure difference that generates lift. Then this Newtonian explanation is unnecessary rubbish and the original explanation was right! That's not true either.

The original explanation incorrectly assumed that air over and under the wing must reconnect at the trailing edge, and there was no mention of deflecting air down. Each explanation, done correctly, completely accounts for the lift generated by a wing. They're just two different ways of looking at the same thing.

So next time someone brings up the standard misconception, you can tell them that explanation just doesn't fly. And if you liked that, you've gotta check out MinutePhysics. I've got total respect for a guy who does this every week.

Sincerely, a collection of particles known as Derek.

More Articles

View All
The Atlantic slave trade
Hey Becca, hey Kim! So in this video we’re going to continue talking about how this arbitrary racial hierarchy was established in America, specifically about the beginning of the Atlantic slave trade and how our society became so stratified by race so ear…
Cooking a Chicken in a Particle Accelerator #kurzgesagt #shorts
Cooking a chicken with a particle accelerator, how would that work? First, we need a raw chicken. That’s easy. Then, we need a particle accelerator. So, let’s put a chicken in it. To avoid collisions between air molecules and beam particles, we have to p…
Passive Income: How To Invest $100 In 2023
What’s up, Graham? It’s guys here, so imagine if you had an extra five, ten, or even twenty dollars a day deposited into your bank account without you having to do any work whatsoever. What color would your Lambo be? All right, in all seriousness, someon…
2015 AP Chemistry free response 3d | Chemistry | Khan Academy
Calculate the pH at the half equivalence point. So let’s just remind ourselves what the half equivalence point even is. The equivalence point is when the titrant, in this case the hydrochloric acid, completely reacts with the potassium sorbate, the thing…
Life Below the Ocean Surface | StarTalk
So you know that’s a fish. Oh, that’s cool. He’s cute, or she. You can’t even tell. But what is that fish thinking? Is it like— is it nostalgia? Is it rage? Maybe I’m just projecting. But you can’t really tell what it’s thinking. It’s a mystery. It’s an e…
2015 AP Calculus BC 6c | AP Calculus BC solved exams | AP Calculus BC | Khan Academy
Write the first four nonzero terms of the McLaurin series for e to the x. Use the McLaurin series for e to the x to write the third degree Taylor polynomial for G of x, which is equal to e to the x * F of x about x equal to 0. So McLaurin series, if tha…