yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Don’t chase happiness. Become antifragile | Tal Ben-Shahar | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

There are only two kinds of people who do not experience painful emotions. The first kind are the psychopaths. The second kind are dead. (bell tolls) (mournful music) There is a false understanding or expectation that a happy life means being happy all the time. No. Learning to accept, and even embrace painful emotions is an important part of a happy life. And the study of painful emotions is an important part of the field of happiness studies.

My name is Tal Ben Shahar. I'm a student and teacher in the field of happiness studies. And my most recent book is "Happier, No Matter What". There is a very important concept that was introduced by Nassim Taleb. And that is antifragility. Antifragility is essentially resilience 2.0. Resilience 1.0 is when we put pressure on a system. After the pressure is lifted, that system goes back to its original form. Antifragility takes this idea a step further. You put pressure on a system. It actually grows bigger, stronger.

We see antifragile systems all around us and within us. For example, our muscular system. We go to the gym and we lift weights. We're putting pressure on our muscles. What happens as a result? We actually grow stronger. We're an antifragile system. On the psychological level, you know what that's called? PTG, post-traumatic growth. So where post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD, is about breaking down, post-traumatic growth is about growing stronger as a result of pressure of stress. It's antifragility.

The role of the science of happiness is to teach us what conditions we can put in place to increase the likelihood of growing from hardship. Now, there is a paradox when it comes to pursuing happiness. (bright music) On the one hand, we know that happiness is a good thing, whether in and of itself, or as a means toward other ends. At the same time, we also know from research by Iris Moss and others, that people who say to themselves, "Happiness is important for me, I want to pursue it," those individuals actually end up being less happy. In fact, they're more likely to experience depression.

So the paradox is that on the one hand, happiness is clearly a good thing. On the other hand, valuing it as a good thing is problematic. So what do we do? The way to resolve this paradox is that we pursue happiness indirectly. Think about sunlight. So if I look at the sun directly, it's going to hurt my eyes. However, if I break down sunlight into its elements, into its constituents, I can look at the colors of the rainbow. So I'm indirectly looking at the sunlight, enjoying it, savoring it.

In the same way, pursuing happiness directly can cause more harm than good. But breaking it down into its elements can lead us to enjoy the indirect pursuit of happiness, and by extension, to raise our overall levels of happiness. What are the metaphorical colors of the rainbow when it comes to happiness? Here we have what I've come to call the SPIRE model. And it can trigger the antifragile system. SPIRE is an acronym that stands for spiritual, physical, intellectual, relational, and finally, emotional well-being.

Spirituality is about finding a sense of meaning and purpose in life, at work and at home. If you wake up in the morning with a purpose, you're more likely to overcome barriers. When it comes to physical wellbeing, the most important idea to look at is stress, the silent killer. In the United States, more than half of the employees do not use up their vacation time. And even those that do, close to half are still tethered to their work. The problem is not the stress, it's the lack of recovery.

With intellectual wellbeing, there's research showing that people who are curious, who ask questions are not just happier, they also live longer. Another important element is not just asking questions, it's deeply engaging with material. It can be text, a work of art, even nature. Relational wellbeing is very important. The number one predictor of happiness is quality time we spend with people we care about and who care about us. And it turns out the number one condition that we can put in pla...

More Articles

View All
What Could Trigger a Shark Attack? | Rogue Shark
Across the Whit Sundays, hundreds of baited cameras are deployed and listening stations fixed as scientists race to understand why these previously safe waters have turned deadly. As the footage comes in, one big clue emerges: the poor visibility. What w…
Searching for the World’s Last Pristine Seas | Nat Geo Live
We have taken fish out of the ocean faster than they can reproduce. Ninety percent of the large fish, like the tuna and the sharks, are gone. And we killed them in the last 100 years alone. Right now about a third of the fisheries of the world have collap…
The Life of a Miner In Colombia | Mine Hunters
Meanwhile, outside, Fred is using his experience in large commercial gold mines to build a system that can protect the area around the mine. So basically, what’s happening here is we’ve got a lot of water drainage out of the mine, and with the water’s co…
Frank Lantz - Director of NYU's Game Center and Creator of Universal Paperclips
I was watching one of your talks earlier this week, and you said something that essentially in game design the most compelling experiences are made out of gaps. But then in another talk, you said games of the aesthetic form of thinking and doing. And if y…
Ray Dalio: Is Investing In China Dangerous?
So as you guys will have noticed, a lot of the discussions in the investing world and a lot of the content on this channel lately has been around China. We did that whole series on Alibaba and the Chinese regulatory crackdown, and now recently we’ve been …
Stalin: a real atheist
This is pawn. Um, this is a message for YouTube Christians, especially those who like to point to the evils of atheism. So, I have atheism in common with some of the most murderous dictators of the 20th century, and I hope I can explain why that doesn’t b…