yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Constructing linear equation from context


2m read
·Nov 11, 2024

Tara was hiking up a mountain. She started her hike at an elevation of 1200 meters and ascended at a constant rate. After four hours, she reached an elevation of 1700 meters. Let y represent Tara's elevation in meters after x hours.

And they ask us, this is from an exercise on Khan Academy, says complete the equation for the relationship between the elevation and the number of hours. And if you're on Khan Academy, you would type it in. But we could do it by hand, so pause this video and work it out on some paper, and let's see if we get to the same place.

All right, now let's do this together. So, first of all, they tell us that she's ascending at a constant rate. So that's a pretty good indication that we could describe her elevation based on the number of hours she travels with a linear equation.

And we can even figure out that constant rate. It says that she goes from 1200 meters to 1700 meters in four hours. So we could say her rate is going to be her change in elevation over a change in time. So her change in elevation is 1700 meters minus 1200 meters, and she does this over four hours.

Her change in time is four hours, so her constant rate in the numerator here, 1700 minus 1200 is 500 meters. She's able to go up 500 meters in four hours. If we divide 500 by 4, this is 125 meters per hour.

And so we could use this now to think about what our equation would be. Our elevation y would be equal to... Well, where is she starting? Well, she's starting at 1200 meters. So she's starting at 1200 meters, and then to that, we're going to add how much she climbs based on how many hours she's traveled.

So it's going to be this rate, 125 meters per hour, times the number of hours she has been hiking. So the number of hours is x times x. So this right over here is an equation for the relationship between the elevation and the number of hours.

Another way you could have thought about it, you could have said, okay, this is going to be a linear equation because she's ascending at a constant rate. You could say the slope-intercept form for a linear equation is y is equal to mx plus b, where b is your y-intercept. What is the value of y when x is equal to zero?

And you say, all right, when x is equal to zero, she's at an elevation of 1200. Then m is our slope, so that's the rate at which our elevation is increasing. And that's what we calculated right over here; our slope is 125 meters per hour.

So notice these are equivalent. I've just... these two terms are swapped. So we could either write y is equal to 1200 plus 125x, or you could write it the other way around. You could write 125x plus 1200. They are equivalent.

More Articles

View All
The Biggest Mistake 20-29 Year Olds Make
This video was made possible by brilliant.org. There are four essential facts that every 20-year-old should know that most are never taught. One: Your energy is a limited resource that you are consciously or unconsciously investing each day. Two: How yo…
Jack Bogle: Should you buy Index Funds at All-Time Highs?
So it’s no secret that the stock market right now is currently smashing through all-time highs, and boy, is the market expensive. We’re currently looking at a Schiller PE of around 35. What that means is essentially investors are willing to pay realistica…
Michael Burry's CRAZY Win on Gamestop (Courtesy of Wall Street Bets)
Can’t stop, won’t stop, Gamestop! The following video is an interesting tale of how this guy rode this wave thanks to these guys and somehow got annoyed by it. [Music] Well, it’s highly likely that in the last couple of weeks, Michael Burry has made an …
End of Space – Creating a Prison for Humanity
Space travel is the most exciting and challenging adventure humanity has ever undertaken. But in an irony of history, we may stop ourselves from going into space the more we do it. With every rocket launched and with every satellite deployed, we’re creati…
Jane Goodall's Inspiration | StarTalk
Back in the 1960s, Jane Goodall, with no formal training in science at the time. I mean, holding aside her four-year-old exploits. The fact is, in the real world, people look, well, what’s your resume? Where did you get your degrees in science? She had no…
Neil deGrasse Tyson on a Dystopic Future | Breakthrough
It’s always been a curious fact to me that the most successful science fiction storytelling involves completely dystopic scenarios or finales, and all of them, essentially all of them. Now maybe at the end they give you some glimmer of hope, but somethin…