yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Reversible reactions and equilibrium | High school chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's imagine a reaction where we start with the reactants A and B, and they react to form the products C and D. Now, it turns out that in certain situations, the reaction could go the other way. You could start with C + D, and those could react to end up with A + B.

So, when you have a reaction like this that could go in either direction, we call that a reversible reaction. That's why the title of this video is "Reversible Reactions and Equilibrium." One way to say that it could go in either direction is to write it like this: A + B, and we use these half arrows.

So, it could go in that direction, or it could go in this direction. You could go to C + D. What's going to happen is the reaction is going to go in both directions. So, A + B is going to react to form C + D, and C + D is going to react to form A + B.

At some point, you're going to be hitting an equilibrium. That's the point at which the forward reaction is happening at the same rate as, I guess, you could consider it to be the backward reaction going from C + D to A + B.

Now, once you're at equilibrium, it doesn't mean that the reactions stop. It just means that the rate of going from A + B to C + D is the same as the rate of going from C + D to A + B. This is a really important thing to realize. A common misconception is that people think at equilibrium, somehow these reactions stop.

That is not the case. It's just that the rate of the forward reaction and the backward reaction has now become the same rate. So, even though you continue to have A + B forming C + D, you have the same rate at which C + D is now also going and forming A + B.

Another misconception here is that the concentrations of A, B, C, and D, once you're in equilibrium, would have stabilized. But it's not necessarily that the concentrations are equal. The point at which we're in equilibrium, you might have a much lower concentration of C and D than A or B, or the other way around.

What equilibrium is telling us is that, at equilibrium, the forward rate of reaction is equal to the backward rate of reaction.

More Articles

View All
63% of Millennials Regret Buying a Home
What’s up, you guys? It’s Graham here. So, we got to talk about this one. A new survey was just released that found that 63% of millennial homeowners regret buying their home. Now, typically when I read articles like this, they tend to exaggerate the trut…
The Last Days of the Romanovs | National Geographic
I think it’s a big tragedy, big tragedy for the country and for the world. For 300 years, the Romanovs ruled Russia as czars—loved, feared, revered, respected. But all too often, those who fly highest fall furthest. World War One brought Russia to revolut…
watch this if you think life is UNFAIR
This video is brought to you by Squarespace. From websites and online stores to marketing tools and analytics, Squarespace is the all-in-one platform to build a beautiful online presence and run your business. Do you think that life is fair? Compare your…
Homeroom with Sal & Kristen DiCerbo PhD - Wednesday, September 23
Hi everyone! Sal here. Welcome to our homeroom live stream. We have an exciting show! We’re going to have Kristen D’Serbo, Khan Academy’s Chief Learning Officer, answering any questions you have about motivation and having more independence as a learner. …
We Might Find Alien Life In 2325 Days
Arthur C. Clarke had a sequel to “2001, A Space Odyssey.” It’s called “2010, Odyssey Two.” And at the end of it, an alien intelligence converts Jupiter into a star. As a group of astronauts narrowly escape the implosion, they receive the following message…
Scientists stumble upon a 12-foot long male tiger shark | Sharks of the Bermuda Triangle
This one looks good. Oh boy! Then, after nearly an hour swimming like a tiger, it’s a tiger! There’s a bite—got a beautiful tiger shark! Oh my God! Dr. Austin Gallagher caught a tiger shark in the Bermuda Triangle, but it’s not Mabel; it’s a 12-foot long …