yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Reversible reactions and equilibrium | High school chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's imagine a reaction where we start with the reactants A and B, and they react to form the products C and D. Now, it turns out that in certain situations, the reaction could go the other way. You could start with C + D, and those could react to end up with A + B.

So, when you have a reaction like this that could go in either direction, we call that a reversible reaction. That's why the title of this video is "Reversible Reactions and Equilibrium." One way to say that it could go in either direction is to write it like this: A + B, and we use these half arrows.

So, it could go in that direction, or it could go in this direction. You could go to C + D. What's going to happen is the reaction is going to go in both directions. So, A + B is going to react to form C + D, and C + D is going to react to form A + B.

At some point, you're going to be hitting an equilibrium. That's the point at which the forward reaction is happening at the same rate as, I guess, you could consider it to be the backward reaction going from C + D to A + B.

Now, once you're at equilibrium, it doesn't mean that the reactions stop. It just means that the rate of going from A + B to C + D is the same as the rate of going from C + D to A + B. This is a really important thing to realize. A common misconception is that people think at equilibrium, somehow these reactions stop.

That is not the case. It's just that the rate of the forward reaction and the backward reaction has now become the same rate. So, even though you continue to have A + B forming C + D, you have the same rate at which C + D is now also going and forming A + B.

Another misconception here is that the concentrations of A, B, C, and D, once you're in equilibrium, would have stabilized. But it's not necessarily that the concentrations are equal. The point at which we're in equilibrium, you might have a much lower concentration of C and D than A or B, or the other way around.

What equilibrium is telling us is that, at equilibrium, the forward rate of reaction is equal to the backward rate of reaction.

More Articles

View All
One Final Shot: 15 Opportunities That Are Going Away Soon
You have all the time in the world until your world suddenly doesn’t have much time left. This year might be your last chance, so here are 15 things you’ve got one last chance to do. First up, change career fields. We seem to be at a breaking point here.…
Going to the Moon… and Discovering Earth | StarTalk
So we try to think what are the drivers that created this change of awareness, because no one really does that without feeling guilt. Even if you did throw things out the window with disregard, in fact, there’s some interesting scenes in Mad Men, which of…
China is Uninvestable.
Stocks based in the world’s second largest economy are uninvestable again. Bernstein sales trading desk’s Mark Schilsky said in a note on Monday, “This idea of Chinese stocks being uninvestable has been a recurring theme in the media over the past few wee…
STOICISM | How Marcus Aurelius Keeps Calm
As emperor of Rome, he was the most powerful man on the planet. Yet, as opposed to many of his successors and predecessors, Marcus Aurelius aimed to live virtuously on a consistent basis. He followed a philosophical school called Stoicism. Part of Stoic p…
1997 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting (Full Version)
[Applause] Foreign. I’m Warren Buffett, the chairman of Berkshire Hathaway. As you probably have gathered by now, I had a real problem last night; I was losing my voice almost entirely. I don’t want you to think I lost it cheering for myself this morning …
Why Trees Are Taller Than They Need To Be
Have you ever noticed how badly people behave when they are collecting their luggage at the airport? I mean, they all cluster right up against the carousel so people behind them can’t see their bags. And then when you do spot your bag, you have to push th…