yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Reversible reactions and equilibrium | High school chemistry | Khan Academy


2m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let's imagine a reaction where we start with the reactants A and B, and they react to form the products C and D. Now, it turns out that in certain situations, the reaction could go the other way. You could start with C + D, and those could react to end up with A + B.

So, when you have a reaction like this that could go in either direction, we call that a reversible reaction. That's why the title of this video is "Reversible Reactions and Equilibrium." One way to say that it could go in either direction is to write it like this: A + B, and we use these half arrows.

So, it could go in that direction, or it could go in this direction. You could go to C + D. What's going to happen is the reaction is going to go in both directions. So, A + B is going to react to form C + D, and C + D is going to react to form A + B.

At some point, you're going to be hitting an equilibrium. That's the point at which the forward reaction is happening at the same rate as, I guess, you could consider it to be the backward reaction going from C + D to A + B.

Now, once you're at equilibrium, it doesn't mean that the reactions stop. It just means that the rate of going from A + B to C + D is the same as the rate of going from C + D to A + B. This is a really important thing to realize. A common misconception is that people think at equilibrium, somehow these reactions stop.

That is not the case. It's just that the rate of the forward reaction and the backward reaction has now become the same rate. So, even though you continue to have A + B forming C + D, you have the same rate at which C + D is now also going and forming A + B.

Another misconception here is that the concentrations of A, B, C, and D, once you're in equilibrium, would have stabilized. But it's not necessarily that the concentrations are equal. The point at which we're in equilibrium, you might have a much lower concentration of C and D than A or B, or the other way around.

What equilibrium is telling us is that, at equilibrium, the forward rate of reaction is equal to the backward rate of reaction.

More Articles

View All
Local linearization
[Voiceover] In the last couple videos, I showed how you can take a function, ah, just a function with two inputs, and find the tangent plane to its graph. The way that you think about this, you first find a point, some kind of input point, which is, you k…
How to Analyze a Balance Sheet Like a Hedge Fund Analyst
In this video, we are going to go over how to analyze a company’s balance sheet. I’m going to use my experience as an investment Analyst at a large investment firm to help you guys better understand what to look for when investing. Whether you are a new i…
Gardening in Small Spaces | Live Free or Die: How to Homestead
[Music] So we live on an acre and a half of land, and we have plenty of space to garden. So we can grow all sorts of different things. But even if we had just a teeny tiny yard, we could also grow a garden. And I’m going to show you one way to grow a gard…
Aoife O'Sullivan: Expert Aviation Lawyer Reveals All
Hi, I’m Steve Varzano with the Jet Business in London, and we’re here today to start with episode one of an interview about the aviation industry. Today, I have with me IFA O’Sullivan from the Air Law Firm. She is one of the most notorious expert aviation…
9 More Video Game WTFs [CONTINUED]
Do you remember Game Genie? This is what would happen if Mario had a magic mushroom. Oh, I love [Music] that someone’s hallucinating. What I love about this is the Game Genie codes themselves are hilarious. The codes he’s using are Zley, Pigp, and I in Co…
Jessica Brillhart, Immersive Director, on VR and AR
So, you started your company this year. My great question: So, this actually ties into my past, actually. I was at Google for years. I started as their first filmmaker with the Creative Lab. I moved on five years later into the Google VR team, which is no…