yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Pronoun number | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 11, 2024

So here's something weird and cool about English and languages in general: they have a sense of number kind of encoded into them. We call this grammatical number. The way this plays out is in the difference between singular and plural in English; the idea of there being one of a thing or more than one of a thing. More than one of a thing—there we go.

This extends throughout the language, and I want to talk about today the way it applies to pronouns. So, the singular form of "me" is "me," right? That's the singular form. The plural form of it—excuse me, the plural form of "me" is "us." Um, because, you know, there are many, assuming—okay, assuming I was cloned, right?

So there's one of me. Fine, that's singular. But let's say I walk into, like, a cloning machine, you know, and it's like a part of it; it's got, like, little bubbles and it's full of this weird viscous liquid, and it shoots out another David. Suddenly, there's two Davids. May the earth tremble! But we have—you know, how do we refer to ourselves? More than one "me" is "us." The grammatical number increases; I'm part of a group now.

Or for a more normal, prosaic, non-cloning example: let’s say my sister and I are going out for coffee. I refer to the two of us together as "us." That's the grammatical number; it's plural. So it's important to remember when you are writing or speaking to keep singular and plural straight throughout the course of a sentence or a paragraph because you don't want to mislead people into thinking you're talking about something else.

Let me show you what I mean. For example, I would say, "I looked at my watch; I don't have a watch anymore. Do you have watches? Do people still have watches?" Um, I wouldn't—I wouldn't say, "I looked at our watch," unless, I don't know, a partner and I shared a watch, right? Unless, like, unless my little sister and I both had the same watch and we traded it back and forth each month, which is pretty unlikely and kind of silly.

What I'm trying to say is that "our" doesn't agree; it doesn't match up with "I" or "my." This is plural; this is singular. That is a very strange place to wear a watch—what is that, at the elbow?

All right, so we've got "the dog wagged its tail," right? Uh, "dog" is singular; "it's" is singular. I want to make sure these things match up. "We made our beds." This is plural, and this is plural, as opposed to "we made my beds," which—who has multiple beds, first of all? But it would also sound like multiple people, including me, were assisting me in making my many beds.

There are two exceptions to this, and they are "you" and "they." Either one can be singular or plural. So there can be a singular "you" or a plural "you." There can be a singular "they" or a plural "they," and I'll explain more about singular "they" later.

The important thing is to be consistent overall. So if you establish that something is singular, you need to maintain that singularity throughout the rest of talking about that thing. So if I'm talking about the cantaloupe—and here's a test: can I spell "cantaloupe" in real-time without looking it up? That looks right to me. The cantaloupe was delicious. In the next sentence, I would say, "I ate it in one sitting."

And it's not "I ate them," it's "I ate it," because there's only one cantaloupe. You see? That's what I mean about grammatical number. Grammatical number agreement is you just want to make sure that this thing, which we call an antecedent, links up with the pronoun.

So the thing you say before you use the pronoun has to match up in terms of whether it's singular or plural. You get that figured out, and you will be a master of grammatical number. You can learn anything.

David out.

More Articles

View All
Approximating solutions with graphing calculator
We’re told this is the graph of ( y ) is equal to ( \frac{3}{2} ) to the ( x ) and that’s it right over there. Use the graph to find an approximate solution to ( \frac{3}{2} ) to the ( x ) is equal to ( 5 ). So pause this video and try to do this on your …
Roth IRA: How to be a TAX FREE MILLIONAIRE with $12 PER DAY
What’s up you guys, it’s Graham here. So I realized that this sounds completely far-fetched to say that you could become a millionaire completely tax-free by investing just 12 dollars a day, but I promise you guys, if you just watch this video all the way…
TESLA IN THE S&P 500 | NEW $4000 PRICE TARGET??
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So we got to celebrate today because not only is it a super rare occasion that I actually post a video here on a Tuesday, but this one deserves it because it’s officially announced that Tesla is going to be added to t…
A monopsonistic market for labor | Microeconomics | Khan Academy
So let’s continue with our conversation around factors of production for a firm, and we’re going to focus on the labor market. So we’ve already drawn axes like this multiple times, where our horizontal axis this is the quantity, quantity of labor that’s …
Things You Should Never Try To Buy With Money
When people get a hold of a bag of money, they tend to buy all the things they lack. But sometimes, even though what they try to buy can be bought, the quality they get is subpar. These are five things you should never try to buy with money. Welcome to a…
Sal Khan & John Dickerson: introduction | US government and civics | Khan Academy
So, Sal here from Khan Academy, and I’m excited to be here with John Dickerson, co-host of CBS This Morning. And I’m excited to be here too! Some of y’all might be wondering what we are doing together. We are going to be talking about civics and governme…