yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Don’t blame tech for your distracted brain. Take control. | Nir Eyal | Big Think


3m read
·Nov 3, 2024

Processing might take a few minutes. Refresh later.

I took the advice of every other expert in book out there about managing distraction of focus, and I got rid of all my technology. I did a digital detox. I got myself a flip phone, and I bought myself a word processor off eBay from the 1990s. I thought getting rid of all the technology would solve the problem, but of course, it didn't.

I sit down on my desk, and I start, you know, working away on that word processor, and realize, oh, you know, there's that book I've been meaning to read. Or let me just tidy up my desk real quick. Or, oh, the trash should be taken out right now. I kept getting distracted because I hadn't learned tactics and techniques to cope with my internal triggers in a healthier manner.

So what we can do to deal with these internal triggers is to learn strategies to cope with discomfort. There are three main strategies for coping with these internal triggers and dealing with them in a more healthful manner. The first is to reimagine the trigger itself. If we can change our perception of that uncomfortable emotional state and explore that sensation with curiosity rather than contempt, that has been shown to be a much healthier way to move us towards traction as opposed to distraction.

The second technique is to reimagine the task itself. It turns out that people find ways to enjoy all sorts of tasks that other people find horribly boring and unfun. Well, it turns out that researchers tell us that we can actually learn to quote play anything. If we change how we imagine the task itself, we can actually find that there can be fun in the task.

Now, this isn't in the Mary Poppins way of putting a spoonful of sugar. It turns out that that actually doesn't work. In fact, what we want to do instead is to focus more intently on the task while looking for the variability within it. Finally, the last thing we can do is to reimagine our temperament. One of the most prevalent bits of folk psychology is this idea that willpower is depletable, that you run out of it like gas in a gas tank.

There actually was some research a few years ago that found that this did occur. But when other researchers wanted to replicate these studies, they found that for the vast majority of people, they did not experience what's called ego depletion. This idea that willpower runs out, except for one group of people, according to Carol Dweck at Stanford University. Ego depletion was found only in people who believed in the phenomenon.

So if you were the kind of person who believed that your willpower runs out, that you're spent at the end of the day, and if you were anything like I used to be, I'd sit down on the couch and I'd say, uh, how can I possibly resist any more temptations? And I'd watch Netflix and have a pint of Ben and Jerry's ice cream to reward myself because I had spent all my willpower.

Well, it turns out that was a self-limiting belief that I had told myself about my temperament. So what we need to do is to reimagine our temperament, particularly this pernicious belief that technology is addicting all of us, that it's hijacking our brains. That is scientific rubbish; it is not true.

In fact, when we tell people this myth that it's addicting everyone, it's hijacking our brains, that there's nothing we can do about it, guess what? It becomes true. This is called learned helplessness. When people believe there's nothing they can do about the big bad algorithms and the corporations taking over their brains, they stop trying.

And so, of course, it becomes the case that big, when they feel they can't do something about it, they don't do anything about it. So what I wanted to do within Distractible was to show people that we are far more powerful than we know, that there are some simple things that we can do, like mastering our internal triggers to control our attention and choose our life.

More Articles

View All
Mystery of Prince Rupert's Drop at 130,000 fps - Smarter Every Day 86
Hey, it’s me, Destin. Welcome back to Smarter Every Day! Today, we’re gonna do awesome science with orbits at Hot Glass here at Lookout Mountain, Alabama. Goggle up; science is about to happen! We’re gonna use a high-speed camera and learn about Prince Ru…
Relative maxima and minima worked example
This is the Khan Academy exercise on relative maxima and minima, and they ask us to mark all the relative maximum points in the graph. Like always, pause this video and see if you can figure out which are the relative maximum points. Okay, now let’s work…
The Reason I’m $1.8 Million In Debt
What’s up you guys? It’s Graham here. So, I really feel like this is something worth addressing given just how much misinformation there’s been surrounding a few of the recent videos that I made. Two of which really stand out the most. The first one is wh…
How Politicians Keep Getting So Rich
This is Representative Alan Lowenthal, a Democrat in California. He sits on the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, which on the 6th of March 2020 released this report detailing the preliminary findings from an investigation into the Boe…
Misconceptions About Falling Objects
Let’s say Jack holds both balls above his head and then he drops them at exactly the same time. What do you expect to see? Well, they’re going to hit the ground at the same time. I expect them to both land at the same time. The same time, same time! This…
Analyzing problems involving definite integrals | AP Calculus AB | Khan Academy
The population of a town grows at a rate of ( r(t) = 300 e^{0.3t} ) people per year, where ( t ) is time in years. At time ( t = 2 ), the town’s population is 1200 people. What is the town’s population at ( t = 7 )? Which expression can we use to solve t…