yego.me
💡 Stop wasting time. Read Youtube instead of watch. Download Chrome Extension

Worked example: Determining an empirical formula from percent composition data | Khan Academy


3m read
·Nov 10, 2024

Let’s say that we have some type of a container that has some type of mystery molecule in it. So that's my mystery molecule there, and we're able to measure the composition of the mystery molecule by mass. We're able to see that it is 73% by mass mercury, and by mass it is 27% chlorine. So the remainder is chlorine by mass.

So pause this video and see if you can come up with what is likely the empirical formula for our mystery molecule in here. And as a little bit of a hint, a periodic table of elements might be useful.

All right, now let's work through this together. To help us make things a little bit more tangible, I'm just going to assume a mass for this entire bag. Let’s just assume that this entire container is 100 grams. I could have assumed a thousand grams or five grams, but 100 grams will make the math easy because our whole goal is to say, “Hey, what's the ratio between the number of moles we have of mercury and the number of moles we have of chlorine?” And then that will inform the likely empirical formula.

So if we assume 100 grams, well then we are dealing with the situation that our mercury—we have 73 grams of mercury, and we can figure out how many moles this is by looking at the average atomic mass of mercury. That's why that periodic table of elements is useful.

We see that one mole of mercury is 200.59 grams on average. So we could multiply this times one over 200.59 moles per gram. When we multiply this out, the grams will cancel out, and we’re just going to be left with a certain number of moles.

So I’ll take 73, and we’re going to divide it by 200.59. Divided by 200.59 is going to be equal to 0.36. I’ll just say 0.36 because this is going to be a little bit of an estimation game, and significant digits—I only have two significant digits on the original mass of mercury—so 0.36 moles, roughly. I’ll even put “say roughly” right over there.

And I can do the same thing with chlorine. If I have 27% by mass, 27 grams out of 100, which I’m assuming is 27 grams, then how many grams per mole? If I have one mole for chlorine, on average on Earth, the average atomic mass is 35.45 grams.

So this is going to approximate how many moles because the grams are going to cancel out. It makes sense that this is going to be a fraction of a mole because 27 grams is less than 35.45. We take 27 divided by 35.45, and guess that’s to 0.76, roughly 0.76.

And remember when we’re talking about moles, this is how many moles of chlorine we have, or this is how many moles of mercury. That’s a number you can view as the number of atoms of mercury or the number of atoms of chlorine. Moles are just the quantity specified by Avogadro’s number, so this is 0.76 times Avogadro's number—number of chlorine atoms.

So what's the ratio here? Well, it looks like for every one mercury atom, there are roughly two chlorine atoms. If I take two times 0.36, it is 0.72, which is roughly close. It's not exact, but when you're doing this type of empirical analysis, you're not going to get exact results, and it's best to assume the simplest ratio that gets you pretty close.

So if we assume a ratio of two chlorine atoms for every one mercury atom, the likely empirical formula is for every mercury atom, we will have two chlorines. So this could be the likely empirical formula. The name of this molecule happens to be mercury(II) chloride, and I won't go in depth why it's called mercury(II) chloride, but that's actually what we likely had in our container.

More Articles

View All
The Marker | Life Below Zero
The hailstones are returning to Camp from a hunting trip, but without a marker to guide them along the treacherous River, their path home is uncertain. “This is it right here. You see how hard that was? This is just inches off the surface of the water. Y…
The scientific method
Let’s explore the scientific method. Which at first might seem a bit intimidating, but when we walk through it, you’ll see that it’s actually almost a common-sense way of looking at the world and making progress in our understanding of the world and feeli…
Equilibrium nominal interest rates in the money market | AP Macroeconomics | Khan Academy
So we’ve spent a lot of time justifying why we have this downward sloping demand curve for money, but you’re probably asking, “Well, this is a market. What we need to think about an equilibrium point?” And to do that, we need to think about the supply of …
Brave New Words - Ethan Mollick & Sal Khan
Hi everyone, it’s here from Khan Academy, and as some of you all know, I have released my second book, “Brave New Words,” about the future of AI in education and work. It’s available wherever you might buy your books. But as part of the research for that …
Nullius in Verba
The beginning of infinity is not an easy book to read. To some level, Deutsch could not but write for other physicists. He has a certain peer group that he respects and who respect him, and he has to meet them at their level. So, he has to write for other…
Prepositions of space | The parts of speech | Grammar | Khan Academy
Hello, Garans. So we had said previously that prepositions, uh, express relationships between two ideas, right? And we can do that either in time or in space or in other ways. But today I want to talk about prepositions in [Music] space because this is a…